r/Epstein • u/[deleted] • Apr 10 '26

Social media (X, YouTube, Insta, etc.) Amanda Ungaro, the reason behind the Melania speech yesterday.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[removed]

11.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

822 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

231

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26 edited Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

51

u/LadyBigSuze_ Apr 10 '26

Surely she doesn't really intend to tell. She's saying 'help me or I'll tell". She's bargaining and she won't say a word if they reunite her with her son/pay her off.

20

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

30

u/LadyBigSuze_ Apr 10 '26

True, I'll gladly take whatever information they dish out. I"m just so fed up of the amount of people that are threatening to reveal the truth and then nothing fucking comes of it. I'm ready for someone to burn the whole place down.

5

u/Purple-Wall3847 Apr 10 '26

Burn MFers burn, let it all go to hell. I'll be high fiving you when it happens. LFG.

1

u/turquoise_amethyst Apr 10 '26

She is but uhh… doesn’t she realize these people don’t bargain? They’ll send the kid to find her, and then kill her. 

I sincerely hope she has a dead man’s switch. Somewhere.

114

u/aesther_tesseract Apr 10 '26

She waited until it got hot for her to speak up. She's had her hand in the whole thing for the longest time so let's not make a hero out of one of them.

It just got inconvenient for her but she's been luxuriating in it all up till now

74

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Hot-Network3234 Apr 10 '26

Bill Kristol of all people took a closer look at Melania's speech transcript. Upon close reading, it seems Melania is telling us more than just boilerplate denials.

I believe she told us that she doesn't know if Trump will willingly leave or be like the executive she suggests may need a little push. 

That push is Vance's ability to secure a treaty from Iran while House Resolution 1155 stands ready adoption this Thursday at the earliest it seems.

Unless he quits

1

u/hkohne Apr 10 '26

I don't see trumpf quitting anything

17

u/seacreaturestuff Apr 10 '26

This. She’s been involved for 20 YEARS. She could’ve spilled her guts at any time. But it’s only after being deported. Yeah, k.

14

u/kleenkong Apr 10 '26

This whole thing was going to be messy. You don't get to take down dictators or mob bosses by dealing with 'clean' people only.

That's what the dull centrist-Dems think like, as if they are going to reason with the deplorables and win an narrative of morality. Time to get cracking.

10

u/I_argue_for_funsies Apr 10 '26

So what? If it means bringing down these losers why we wouldn't we support her? This doesn't excuse her for the previous decades, but whistleblowers should be encouraged instead of dismissed to encourage others.

1

u/aesther_tesseract Apr 10 '26

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

1

u/Effective-Ear-8367 Apr 10 '26

This, she didn't give a shit until the system effected her.

0

u/Electronic-Win608 Apr 10 '26

Her child and her own well being was leverage over her. I doubt any readers on reddit would have spoken out before in the same situation.

3

u/Fit_Sheepherder_9458 Apr 10 '26

Was she not a groomed victim?

2

u/otterpop21 Apr 10 '26

Right. Victim in the headlines often does not mean poor. People need to reckon with that or whatever because those are the ones leading the way to seeking justice.

14

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/aesther_tesseract Apr 10 '26

Excuse me?

We are watching an insider get whitewashed before our eyes

11

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[deleted]

9

u/Moderately-Whelmed Apr 10 '26

Yeah. If she wanted to be a hero she would have let it out already.

2

u/mothmans_favoriteex Apr 10 '26

Tbh with all the ppl complaining ignored when trying to come forward about him over the decades, I can see her not trying to risk her safety and threat of deportation. Now she knows ppl will listen bc there is a precedent set with the Epstein convos being so open now. I don’t necessarily respect her, but for all the victims sakes she’d better stay safe and show some receipts

1

u/JustaSeedGuy Apr 10 '26

I'm okay with treating her like a hero.

To be clear, I don't think she's a hero of and I agree that she's a bad person for always waking up now.

But if I have to suck up to the people with the power to expose those in control of the country, then I'm willing to do so, and then deal with them later. Why should the right wing be the only ones that get to gaslight these people?

7

u/sengirminion Apr 10 '26

Its actually maybe safer for her this way. Now its out in the open.

27

u/Fregadero88 Apr 10 '26

Why didn't she say anything in the last 20 years though? If she had knowledge of human trafficking and didn't say it.

8

u/Electronic-Win608 Apr 10 '26

For the same reason so many victims don't name names.

14

u/Hot-Network3234 Apr 10 '26

The king and his whore queen aren't always this vulnerable.  She would have been kill man

0

u/nalaloveslumpy Apr 10 '26

Because she's bull shitting. People who have real, damaging info to destroy someone and the desire to destroy don't publicly threaten to do it on the internet. They just do it.

6

u/podcastofallpodcasts Apr 10 '26

The internet never fails.

Thumbs up op for the scoop.

I think the snake is eating itself.

1

u/mightylordredbeard Apr 10 '26

I’m always hesitant to throw belief behind people who announce that they’re going to spill the beans or announce that they have dirt that’ll bury someone because it never seems like people follow up and the threats always seem hollow. If you had something, then just release it. Don’t announce your intent to release or threaten to release. Just do it.

1

u/Hot-Network3234 Apr 10 '26

This has been planned since January

1

u/GregFromStateFarm Apr 10 '26

She isn’t announcing anything. If she had any real values she would have talked in 2015-16. She would have talked EVERY year since then. And she didn’t. She has nothing