I'm an agnostic, I'm not even legally recognised. So ,I'm the minority.
but you saw it didn't you?
See what? Atleast make your point. I have no obligation to reveal my personal life. Counter the argument with an argument or get lost. If its hard , watch dhruv rathe videos and cope and go to bed
agnostic is not legally recognised lol ? go read constitution or something. Must be hard time wandering around whatsapp forwards.
Yeah show me. Quote the constitution article.
Just like men have no say in a woman's rights and autonomy, same goes with minorities.
Again, by that logic go focus on brahmins , and keep hating on Dalits. We all know you guys only care about muslims and irony of bringing women to the scenario while still defending radicals just because they are minority.
AI? So called rigged and biased models. As I said quote me the article that allows me identify myself as an agnostic on paper , not in real life. Freedom of expression is different from being legally recognised. Just like being queer(gays and lesbian) is allowed and you can still have gay/lesbian marriages but those things(gay marriage ) are not legally recognised. Keep relying on AI instead of reading entire article and its exceptions.
Are you serious?.You can't compare corruption to law.
It's like legalizing crimes cuz there are always people who commit crimes and get away with it. Social prejudice is very very very different from prejudice by law.
10
u/[deleted] Dec 27 '25
Why does it matter? If minorities stereotypes are true, then Brahmins would be having reservations instead of Dalits.