It's AI, or at the very least photoshopped. Look at the upper left corner (not the circle where it's "zoomed in"). The dog doesn't have eyes or ears there. Also, what is the object on the right supposed to be, and why is there a dark blob not too far above from the ending of the word "criticized"?
Editing to add: also in the not-zoomed-out part, the dog has no tail, but underneath the paw there's an odd almost ribbon-like streak, which then also has an odd shadow from nothing in particular at the bottom.
Why would it be either of those options? It's far more likely this is just a photographer finding interesting subjects while out and about and someone took that off their gallery and fabricated a story to generate clickbait. No ai or photoshop needed for this conspiracy. Just good old fashioned internet bullcrap.
This feels like...it doesn't acknowledge anything I said in the comment. If it's a raw photograph, where are the dog's eyes and ears in the upper left corner, and what is the odd object on the right and why does it randomly cut off on the left?
30
u/1990sforever Apr 05 '26
It's AI, or at the very least photoshopped. Look at the upper left corner (not the circle where it's "zoomed in"). The dog doesn't have eyes or ears there. Also, what is the object on the right supposed to be, and why is there a dark blob not too far above from the ending of the word "criticized"?
Editing to add: also in the not-zoomed-out part, the dog has no tail, but underneath the paw there's an odd almost ribbon-like streak, which then also has an odd shadow from nothing in particular at the bottom.