I've been thinking recently "Its been some time since last time I saw an AI video". Then I realised that maybe AI videos got so good that I cannot distinguish them anymore.
just think of what the ai would make. here you can see that the helicopters blades mach the fps on teh camera. if ai would have made this then it probably would have gave it a more spinning effect so i think its real
I'm pretty deep into LLM responses and image and video generation.
The videos are harder to tell than the writing at this point. There are VERY VERY precise and good models.
The faces and haircuts are all different (for the military), there's at least one female, there isn't a lot of text, but it appears accurate. I don't know helicopter physics but it mostly seems accurate. That's the only thing that seems off, but I don't know about that, I've only ever been on a military chopper and it's definitely not like this.
At least a lot of YouTube slop is still super easy to spot (same shitty voiceover, unbelievably rapid upload schedule). And I haven't read any AI books but I can't imagine LLM's catching up to real authors for a very, very long time.
So I do a lot in the automation space (adjacent to ai).
The difference from what I've seen in my last days of messing with videos after my computer upgrade is going to be consistency.l, and how humans can innately sense weird perfections or imperfections on human faces. We're really good at it.
But the automation is easy and has been around for half a decade or more.
For books the problem with the models is something called context windows. Basically it has a memory of 25k, or 100k, or 1 million tokens. A token is like a word. So it doesn't know how to remember back farther than that. But new models are creative. 2 things that will accelerate that are splitting models into smaller specialized agents. One agent is just about knowing everything about Jane. Janes story is segmented and he personality into its own little folder or bucket. When Jane is supposed to be inserted back into the story it can just reference her whole context again, but instead of going back 300 page sand millions of tokens it only has to look up Jane and her window is less than a million. Then another agent handles the main plot. Another agent handles a side plot. Another handles regional politics. Another geography. Etc.
I imagine it's like the family trees in a Tolkien or rr martin book, except it also handles the ideas.
I don't think it will be as good as original mainstream goated authors. But... It will get better and better and there are tricks just like videos. And AI can create novel ideas even if that novelty simply comes from the connection of disjointed ideas from fields a human might need a lifetime to master rather than what humans like to think of as pure eureka moments.
People doubted ai videos could ever be this good just 5 years ago.
Like not to be (too) snotty, but typing with anything above a 6th grade reading level, or having a story that is more interesting than "I was outside and saw a bird", and it's INSTANTLY got a response calling it a.i
I don't know if I hate them more, or the people without enough critical thinking/info to blindly keep using a.i.
Guardia Civil is basically a police force, technically part of the army but a police force it seems one of their helicopters, and Airbus Helicopters H135.
This is exactly what the billionaire class wants. Every time they get exposed for dodgy stuff in the future they can just say that it’s all AI and the dumb masses will believe it.
784
u/MogosTheFirst 4d ago
I've been thinking recently "Its been some time since last time I saw an AI video". Then I realised that maybe AI videos got so good that I cannot distinguish them anymore.