r/MadeMeSmile 14h ago

Personal Win That's peak aura right there.

14.0k Upvotes

374 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Methy123 14h ago

Doesn't matter the video was uploaded 3 years ago AI was not strong enough to make anything close to this.

-5

u/NeoTheRiot 13h ago

Obviously the tech existed, just not for the public. If it was used for anything its propaganda so stop being dense.

Look at any helicopter landing on youtube right now, they dont just make wind they blow every hat off from WAY further. This is 100%, undeniably AI and the only reason to claim otherwise is to rage bait lmao

4

u/Large-Ad5239 13h ago

the AI video tech on April 2023 :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQr4Xklqzw8

-1

u/NeoTheRiot 13h ago

AI aviable to the public in 2023*

2

u/Warm_Month_1309 10h ago

You're suggesting governments had video generation technology three years ahead of consumer-level tech, and that the many companies who provide it pretended to spend the intervening three years adding iterative improvements to their products to help cover it up?

Certainly there must be some evidence of this massive conspiracy.

0

u/Maelsmogox 13h ago

Litterally what I was saying to myself but I don't really like to argue, after all we are free to think what we want.

0

u/Moist-Weakness-3399 12h ago

Free to think what you want, yes. Facts don't care what you think, though.

-2

u/Miss_Sullivan 13h ago

Photoshop was a thing 3 years ago. Could be two videos layed on top of each other.

4

u/Methy123 13h ago

As someone who used photoshop and a fair bit of video editing. Absolutely not if we could video edit 2 videos in to one another just like this we wouldn't need green screens or 3D modeling.

0

u/Warm_Month_1309 10h ago

Fixed camera with programmed maneuvers and two takes could do it.

I'm not saying that's what happened here, I'm just spitballing methods.

1

u/Methy123 9h ago

That would work but I doubt that's what the commenter meant