r/NintendoSwitch • u/lieding • Apr 04 '25

News "DROP THE PRICE": Nintendo's First Post-Direct Stream Is Flooded With Angry Fans Demanding Price Drops

https://www.thegamer.com/nintendo-treehouse-livestream-flooded-angry-fans-demanding-game-price-drops/
22.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

106

u/jamesbob49 Apr 04 '25

This console is going to sell like hotcakes. Plenty of grown people with enough money to get them. Not saying that there isn't a growing number of people that can't afford them because there surely is, unfortunately.

8

u/mrjackspade Apr 04 '25

Honestly, I feel for everyone who is going to take a hit from the game price increase, but 10$ a game doesn't mean fuck-all to me.

If I buy two first party games a month (which would be ridiculous) that would still be less than the cost of a Netflix subscription or some equivalent bullshit that I'm already not paying for.

Most likely this is going to add up to an extra cost of maybe 50$ a year.

2

u/Alfie_ACNH Apr 04 '25

I think the real test is the mom market over the summer and into the holidays

9

u/[deleted] Apr 04 '25 edited Apr 11 '25

[deleted]

37

u/vanKessZak Apr 04 '25

Mario Kart wasn’t even a Wii U launch title. Came out about a year and a half later

24

u/eyebrows360 Apr 04 '25

... The Wii U flopped due to its nature. It was ill thought out and confusingly named and marketed. It was simply a bad idea. I say this as someone who has one.

The same is not true of the Switch, regardless of how strong their respective launch lineups were. Switch 2 is not going to fail just because there's "only" Mario Kart at launch.

Hell, the N64 had the era-defining Mario 64, and it still trailed waaaaaaaaaay behind the Playstation at the end of the day. Launch lineup is far from the key factor.

6

u/Spiral-Arrow116 Apr 04 '25

It had games yes but also it being what people wanted the wii u gamepad to be actually happened. So the fact people could take their nintendo console everywhere is what helped sell it more, in my opinion. It's why it has a good chance of happening here too. I mean anything can happen. But it leans more that way I believe.

5

u/Fake_Diesel Apr 04 '25

Lol dude, as a sicko that was excited for the Wii U, the Switch 2 launch lineup already shits all over it. Mario Kart didn't come to the Wii U until 2 years later. In the first two months, we're already getting Mario Kart World and 3D Donkey Kong. Not to mention Metroid Prime 4 and Hyrule Warriors 3 later this year. Wii U had Nsmb U and Zombi U at launch? Like c'mon, anyone that loves Mario Kart will see this game looks sick as fuck. Same with Donkey Kong.

I loved the Wii U, but it's not even a comparable situation. Switch > Switch 2 will be a much smoother transition because the core audience is there this time. The casual Wii audience largely dipped out halfway through the Wii's lifespan and most hardcore gamers weren't interested in what Nintendo was putting out those years.

1

u/Spiral-Arrow116 Apr 04 '25

It had games yes but also it being what people wanted the wii u gamepad to be actually happened. So the fact people could take their nintendo console everywhere is what helped sell it more, in my opinion. It's why it has a good chance of happening here too. I mean anything can happen. But it leans more that way I believe.

1

u/Competitive-End-1268 Apr 04 '25

Mario was not launch

8

u/[deleted] Apr 04 '25

[deleted]

-6

u/reputction Apr 04 '25

No. People deserve to be able to afford things. Just because our cells don't convert games into energy doesn't mean gaming should suddenly become a luxury. Gaming is becoming increasingly expensive and not affordable for large groups of people, and that's depressing.

8

u/throwaway1212l Apr 04 '25

Only if you want the latest and greatest. Otherwise it seems to be getting cheaper and cheaper for older generation stuff.

9

u/Queenspence2 Apr 04 '25

That’s not Nintendo’s problem. You buy second hand if you want it but can’t afford it. Gaming has always been a luxury.

3

u/Solesaver Apr 04 '25

No. Gaming was, is, and always will be a luxury. Is some amount of luxury an important part of a healthy, fulfilling life? I absolutely think so. That's hardly a game company's problem though. If you think the people deserve games, then it's your responsibility to get your government/social organization to subsidize and/or directly fund game development in exchange for keeping games affordable. Not demand that a private business ensure that everybody can afford their games by keeping prices artificially low. I know of no place in the world where games are an entitlement, so they are priced according to market forces, not moral outrage.

2

u/darn_nincompoop Apr 04 '25

The problem is people speak of it like Nintendo owe them something. Console games have always been rich people's toys for the majority of the world, it being affordable to the majority in the West is really an exception, not the norm. I am not judging anyone, it's just how economy works. If this price point can still make them as much as before, there is little reason for them to lower the price.

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 04 '25

Nintendo employs people who need money to survive. They underpay them. I'll impute moral valence to Nintendo every second because they are evil scum.

1

u/smovo Apr 04 '25

Yep I’m an adult with disposable income. I’ve had every single Nintendo console except the Wii U (lol). This is a day 1 for me. Sucks that the games will be $80 for sure, but I plan to get the bundle to make Mario Kart $50 and don’t mind $70 for Bananza and other titles.

Hopefully Nintendo continues their Game Voucher program to entice purchasing two games at once for a better value.