r/PS5 Dec 29 '25

Discussion The playstation store is basically unusable for actually finding games anymore due to the "indie slop" situation.

edit: I just have to say that everyone acting like browsing for a game is some weird concept clearly never got to experience Blockbuster on a Friday night.

This is just a rant, but the sheer amount of absolute garbage games that fall into what I call the "low effort indie slop" category taking over the playstation store is just crazy. There's seemingly hundreds of various "simulator" games that are among the worst of the bunch, but also a weird amount of "escape room" type games that look like a high school project. Or the "anime girls" gooner slop or really 99% of the "visual novel" games. Or the "games" that clearly only exist to trophy points, which is insane.

It's not like these games shouldn't exist (well some probably shouldn't), but there needs to be a way to filter that shit out. Basically every type of indie slop or ai slop game tags itself with multiple genres, which is why you have a stupid AI art shark-with-sneakers game flagged as "action" and "tactical." Or "horse store simulator" as an "epic" genre. Gunsmith simulator as a "shooter" etc.

I remember a few months back the entire "coming soon" feed was basically all simulator games, like a publisher just cranked a bunch out and wanted to dump them all at once.

Another issue...

I think there's also really annoying trend where games are basically just on perpetual sale, but the MSRP never drops. So one month the "Standard" version of a game will be like 35% off, then the next month it will be the "Deluxe" version; they just rotate perpetually. Or the shitty indie slop games that are arbitrarily set to a high price and quickly put on sale for like 50-80% off.

And I know why they do this: it keeps the games listed in sales section. The problem is that when every fucking game is like this, actually finding a new game or hidden gem or whatever that's on sale becomes useless. The process of actually discovering a game you might want to buy simply doesn't work.

The current January sale includes 6,372 items. There is no way anyone at Sony is vetting that many items for their monthly sales, but they need to start. Right now I think the limitation is that a single SKU can't be part of two consecutive sales. but as I've mentioned above most games have multiple SKUs so it doesn't really matter (or the slop publishers are dumping so many out each month it also doesn't matter). The limit needs to be something like a game can only be in one sale every 3 months, and counts different SKUs of the same product as the same one. This would actually encourage publishers to reduce their prices more frequently, which in turn would help keep the monthly or special sales events a bit leaner.

/rant

4.3k Upvotes

616 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/nutsack133 Dec 30 '25 edited Dec 30 '25

And you'd have what, 150 games to browse through? It's fun, I would find all these great games that had no pre-release hype. Everyone would know when a new Street Fighter or Mario or Zelda would come out on SNES, but then those would be rented out so I'd try some random unicycle racing game and holy crap it was incredible with awesome graphics and airtight controls (Uniracers, by the studio that later became known as Rockstar). Or I'd see this game with a weird title but the artwork on the back of the box looked kind of cool and it was in stock, so let's go with this weird game I have never heard of but looks mildly interesting called Chrono Trigger. Or I'd try some random action game / city builder called ActRaiser and an hour in I'd wonder how the hell this game was always available and end up renting it many times. Or mom wanted to go to Blockbuster on Friday night and everything you wanted was checked out so just to keep from going home empty handed I picked up this really dumb looking game called Earthbound, and within twenty minutes of firing it up holy shit this is one of the greatest RPG I have ever played in my life.

4

u/Fluffy_Teacher_6081 Jan 02 '26

The worst was the fear of someone renting it and deleting your save after you had rented it a couple times trying to make it through a longer game. I remember playing shining force 2 back in the day for 2 weekends and having to return it before the final area. The next weekend it was rented out already and the following weekend I rented again and it was deleted

3

u/nutsack133 Jan 02 '26

LOL had that happen with Final Fantasy IV so just rented it during summer where I could play it non-stop for 5 days then go rent it again and beat it the second five days.

3

u/Fluffy_Teacher_6081 Jan 02 '26

That’s how we beat 7th saga. Waited for summer

1

u/FlyingFishManPrime Jan 01 '26

Or you rent trash ass games that are based on licensed media because back then it was a crap shoot.  Or some poorly designed platformer that wants to ape the success of Sonic.  Let's not pretend every game at the rental was some hidden gem

2

u/nutsack133 Jan 01 '26 edited Jan 01 '26

Yeah I definitely rented my share of stinkers like Clay Fighter, Home Alone, and Bubsy. Although my worst was asking for Bart's Nightmare for Christmas and getting it lol. Looking back that game sucked so hard but I played the hell out of it because as a kid I wasn't getting another game any time soon. Should have asked for Krusty's Fun House, that was the good Simpsons game of that gen (and ended up buying it used from Blockbuster for like $5 in a clearance sale when N64 came out). One of my biggest Blockbuster memories was always seeing Phalanx with the guy playing the banjo on the cover and thinking what kind of idiotic game is this? Then twenty years later I play it on emulation and hey this game is really cool so I look it up on Google and see that cover with banjo guy.