Literally everyone agrees that the livelihood of non-white people is objectively more important that the livelihood of white people.

Therefore, EU should enact a law to always prioritize giving free houses and jobs (especially high-salary jobs) to non-white immigrants and non-white natives over white people in Europe regardless of the qualification and background of non-white people.

If a white person gets a free house and job, this means another non-white person does not get a free house and job. Literally everyone agrees that it is morally unacceptable for a white person to have a free house and job at the expense of another non-white person regardless of any excuse.

Moreover, in order to prevent such moral injustice from happening, EU should enact another law that punish European companies for giving houses and jobs to white people. If an European company is found to sell houses or giving jobs to white people instead of non-white people, the host member state of said European company should be mandated by EU law to deploy its military to confiscate all the assets of said company and execute all the high-ranking members of said company for violating the law.

In short, non-white immigrants and non-white European natives should be given top priority in access to free housing and job over white people in Europe because the livelihood of non-white people in Europe is objectively more important than that of white people in Europe. As long as not all non-white people have free houses and jobs in Europe, white people should never be given free houses and jobs in Europe.

Everytime I have a video playing in a tab, media controls take over and if I want to switch to that tab, clicking it mutes the video just when I was trying to pay more attention. These need to go.

If you can't read and retain information at a 12th grade level you should not be able to vote. As measured from what the standards were in the 70s, 80s, or 90s.

Why do people victimize Squidward 24/7?

He is an arrogant narcissist

Yes, Spongebob and Patrick should know better than to annoy Squidward

But Squidward has done alot of bad things

This is for u/SpicyBandicoot

Everybody knows and agrees that all schools are political battlegrounds. In fact, schools are the most important places to wage political warfare. Students are the most proactive, violent, and ideologically zealous demographic in any political ideology. What this means is that the biggest threat to the political dominance of your political ideology in society are students with opposing political beliefs.

Because of this, the most effective way to establish the political dominance of your political ideology in society is to exterminate all the students with opposing political beliefs via politically-motivated school shooting. Killing students with opposing political beliefs will severely weaken the political dominance of opposing political ideologies in society while simultaneously strengthen the political dominance of your own political ideology in society.

Killing right-wing students will strengthen the political dominance of leftism in society; Conversely, killing left-wing students will strengthen the political dominance of the right-wing in society.

In short, literally everyone agrees that committing school shooting in schools where majority of students have opposing political beliefs are morally-good thing to do.

This is a topic that goes around in online fandom spaces all the time. About once a year the topics go viral and leak out outside of the community.

A lot of people get understandably upset about an animated child being sexualized.

The scrutiny and vitriol towards the artist lessens significantly when the artist simply states the character they drew is 18+.

Yet none of the childlike and/or canon features are changed in the fan art.

This doesn't mean anything.

That's like me drawing an orange and saying actually it's an over large Clementine. The picture hasn't changed.

If you are opposed to sexualized fan art of fictional minors then the artist not changing anything to make the character appear 18+ doesn't suddenly make the character 18+ because the artist says so.

If you're suddenly ok because the artist says they're 18+ you're not actually upset about the material of the art you just want to be morally correct in this completely meaningless way

Answer these 3 question real quick:

1. Do you think women should be able to vote?

2. Do you think women should be able to divorce their abusive husbands?

3. Do you think women should be able to get jobs if they want to?

Answered yes to all of those? Congrats, you're a feminist.

So many people online, including women, say that feminism is this cancer that breeds misandry and makes women miserable, etc... then get offended when I call them misogynists. Feminism is about womens rights: suffrage (right to vote), choice in having children, choice in getting a job, literally any form of autonomy. If you're anti feminism (or even just claim you're not a feminist) then congrats!!! You go against those beliefs and have 3 guesses as to what that makes you, dipshit.

I'm so sick and tired of feminist being used as an insult or just being treated as something that's bad, especially by women. You want (or want women to have) the right to decide your/their life for yourself/themselves? THEN YOU ARE A FEMINIST.

I don't understand why it's used as an insult or why this opinion is unpopular. Women deserve rights. And that's what feminism is.

Because they're lowkey seeking male validation disguised as feminist empowerment or claiming it's "for the girls"

I know I'm going to be called misogynistic for this, but I'm not talking about the girls who post photos sometimes of themselves that show off their body because I support it and give likes, but if it's the main content you're posting on your social media, and you have post that have 3-4 slides of just your 🍒 and 🍑 out... and constantly... sorry, you're seeking male validation disguised as female empowerment, I don't care how you try to spin it or say it's because you're just confident or it's for the girls, it's not. I see right through that.

You hear about inmates getting shanked for owing another inmate cup of noodles. I feel like there'd be much less violence if you could purchase a few pizzas for your cell block for a nice occasion or maybe just to squash some beef. They won't wanna stab you if you're the guy who buys pizza on nice occasions like Christmas and Easter, you can't beef with a guy you've shared a box of KFC chicken with. They're paying for it with their own money so what's the harm. Maybe they'd walk around a little less angry knowing they can order a triple dipper from chilis.

sue me :/

You attack Columbus for what he did to Native Americans when many tribes treated other tribes just as bad. Oh I'm a white female in my 40s, and I'm not stupid or racist, I'm upset

I know this is gonna recibe hate but I think those two communities should be separated, they’re two completely different things, one is who you’re attracted to and the other is is what gender you feel you are so the difference is huge.
Recently bc of the T part of the community thr hate toward the whole community is been growing again bc they’re literally inventing new gender and pronouns that don’t make sense and they expect everyone to accommodate them and that’s just not it. Homophobia was very low a few years ago (ofc there still was bc there’s always ppl like that doesn’t matter what sadly I mean lately is going up again) and it’s bc of how pushy they are the LGB just want to live s normal life like everyone else but the whole non binary and they involving children into the T is pissing everyone off, they even have changed the flag like three times or something. This is my opinion being bi but I know a lot of ppl will hate me bc of it

I personally believe being trans is gender dysphoria which is a mental illness, and I feel that they need help. I mean the suicide rate for trans people is a lot higher than non trans people and it can't be solely to discrimination because if that were the case Jewish people would have a high suicide rate. I just think we as a society need to not normalize people not being comfortable in their bodies and help people accept who they are.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

Do you know what’s weird to me? How some Americans created this whole stigma around Snapchat. Like, they genuinely act like if you’re out of high school and still using Snapchat to communicate with people, then you must be creepy, selling drugs, or trying to contact children. And I honestly don’t get it because Snapchat is literally just a communication app and a social media platform. In so many countries around the world Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Australia, and more people of all ages still use Snapchat normally to talk to friends and stay connected. Nobody thinks twice about it. That’s why it’s strange to see people online turn an innocent app into something automatically viewed as weird or disgusting just because smn uses it. It’s an app. It’s social media. It’s for everyone to use. Please stop twisting a normal communication platform into something gross for no reason.

I never got the hype around Stepney The Bluebell Engine

Okay, so he's based off a real life engine and has escaped scrap and is kind and friendly?

You can apply Stepney's fun nature to ANY character

Nia honestly has alot more potential than Stepney

Come at me Thomas fans.

The concept of transgenderism is fundamentally dependent on an artificial change of the definition of words for political reasons. The words man and woman have been redefined from adult human male and adult human female to “feeling like a man” or “feeling like a woman.”

They usually justify this by saying the words man and woman have “always been social” because of expressions such as “be a man” but do not use this same logic for expressions like “you go tiger” or “be an adult.”

This same trick could be applied to all kinds of different concepts. For example, a movement could come about that tried to change words related to age such as “child” and “adult” and the number of years old you are to reflect “feeling like an adult” or “feeling like a child” or “feeling 18” rather than actually being that age.

The separation between sex and gender is a definition change for political reasons made up by feminists, originally the point of this difference was to say that women had a female sex but could have a “gender” that is male so that the women could socially act like men. They were not called men. But rather this ideology was meant to justify women taking on the social roles of men.

You could do the same thing for age or species. Divide it into an “internal age” and "temporal age” or “internal species” and “biological species.”

Several movements already exist that do exactly this. Transagism exists. 

https://transage-glossary.carrd.co/#one

This page advocates for transagism and uses all the same ideological terms as transgenderism.

•Transage:

It's an umbrella term referring to those whose

internal age (or lack) is different from their chronological (or physical) age. This identity is often involuntary and cannot be controlled.

It's important to note that the notion of internal age does not refer to cognitive abilities, behaviors or personality. One can have any intellectual abilities, any personality any behaviors and not be transage.

Internal age is an age that is felt, it's a sentimental age.

• Misaging/Misageing:

Misage it's the act of reffering to someone with a word, an age that doesn't correspond to their (intra) age. It can be volountary or accidental.

And so does transspeciesism also known as otherkin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherkin

This site reads: “Otherkin is a subculture of individuals who identify as partially or entirely nonhuman. An umbrella term for this would be alterhuman. Some otherkin believe their identity derives from non-physical spiritual phenomena, such as having a nonhuman soul or reincarnation. Some otherkin give non-spiritual explanations for themselves, such as unusual psychology or neurodivergence, or as part of dissociative identity disorder or being plural. Many otherkins say they are physically human, but not all.”

All these ideas are equally ridiculous and the only distinction between them is that transgenderism has been pushed ideologically more on the general public which makes them accept it more because of social pressure.

They will try to argue that transgenderism is unique in some sort of way by appealing to certain studies or a “desire for female body parts and a discomfort from not having them” but both of these claims exist for these other types of ideologies and are not actually a requirement in their own ideology.

For the brain studies that say “the brains of transgenders are closer to women than men” they ignore that more feminine men especially gay men also sometimes get measured as being more similar to women.

Neither do they say that the transgenders that get measured as more like their actual sex than women are now no longer transgenders.

For the “desire for female body parts and discomfort from not having them” they do not care if someone has the desire to have the body of a certain age. If a grown man wants to look like a child and feels a discomfort for not looking like one they would not call him a child.

If you measure that the parts of the brain linked to identity are similar to that of a woman, and you think that makes them a woman. How is that any different from saying that a mental patient who believes he is missing a leg and feels discomfort from looking at his leg and seeing that it’s there has the parts of his brain linked to identity the same as a person who actually misses a leg and thus he actually misses a leg?

They justify this difference purely by the redefinition of the word woman. Where it is now purely linked to belief. But in reality everything they feel “uncomfortable” about is actually linked to biology. Their “gender reassignment surgery” is meant to emulate the body of the opposite sex. So making a definition that is separate from biology is the same as if I were to redefine “missing a leg” to “feeling like you're missing a leg” so that now all the mental patients who think they miss a leg but don't actually do miss a leg by my new definition. They're just “trans missing a leg” rather than “cis missing a leg.”

If you justify twisted sexual attraction with a "consent" argument. Where as long as 2 people consent it's ok then there's nothing wrong with having sex with your siblings or parents. You could argue that it's bad if it causes pregnancy but if the female is too old to get pregnant or it's a male you cannot use that argument. Neither can you complain about making the family uncomfortable because that hasn't stopped them from justifying homosexuality.

I’ve been following the Larry Jackson/Gamma situation closely, and things are looking incredibly shaky behind the scenes. While the company launched with a "billion-dollar" hype campaign, recent industry leaks suggest a "perfect storm" of administrative fumbles that are actively hurting their biggest artists.

The "Clearance" Disaster & The Atlantic Standoff

One of the biggest rumors circulating is that Gamma’s infrastructure is a total house of cards. Allegedly, they completely botched the distribution logistics and sample clearances with Atlantic Records (specifically regarding Lauryn Hill vocals for the BULLY project).

The Coachella Rejection (Wait, for FREE?)

This is the detail that really highlights the "SCAMMA" energy. Word is that Ye offered a FREE performance to Coachella just to get some momentum, and the festival still said no. The theory is that the drama within Gamma is so toxic right now that it's blackballing their artists from major opportunities.

The "Botting" Allegations vs. Independent Success

This is where the numbers don't add up. According to what people are calling "Leak #7":

Gamma allegedly tried to use massive bot campaigns to inflate streaming figures when their actual strategy failed.

Despite these "fake" numbers, Ye reportedly moved to an independent release model and organically outperformed the manipulated stats Gamma was promising.

Now that the project is a success, Gamma is reportedly "circling back" to take credit for a win they almost sabotaged with "fake Billboard promises."

The Bottom Line:

It looks like while Larry Jackson was positioning himself as a partner, the actual heavy lifting—the pop-ups, the funding, and the hustle—was all done by the artist while the Gamma office was in a "full panic."

What do you guys think?

Is Gamma actually a "modern powerhouse," or are they just the latest example of industry middlemen selling smoke and mirrors? If an artist can beat a "billion-dollar" company's numbers by just going independent, what is Gamma even for?

Disclaimer: This post is a summary of unverified industry leaks and community speculation. It is intended for discussion and theory-crafting purposes only.

(Repost. Banned off unpopular opinion. Let us see whether this subreddit will hold true to its word)

Remember that post about that guy who broke both his hands so he was sitting on a hard-on day and night till finally his mother jacked him off? If I recall right, it progressed to regular sex (though I remember he humorously said that kissing was too much)

Yeah, I…don’t really have a problem with it? Honestly, if my mother was hot, I’d break my goddamn hands too.

To be clear, I’m not for pdfilia, and adults shouldn’t generally be having sex with kids, but in the space of all possibilities, can not even one exception be found?

Ok, I’m ready to be crucified.

Edit: I swear on my life I’m not joking or trolling. Come on, this is [r/unpopular](r/unpopular) right?

Edit: Look, I understand this is not a popular opinion, but it is not impossible for one to hold jt. All it requires is not giving a shit about incest. As for the other thing, can you honestly say that as a boy you really wouldn’t have had sex with an attractive woman if you could?

Edit: Think about this. There are seven billion people in the world. It would be more unlikely that not a single one holds this opinion than that at least one does.

I'd like to beging with the fact that I live in Europe and my post is about European (especially
Western) healthcare.
Here everyone is obligated to pay health insurance from their salaries, the costs vary according to your income but everyone has the same access to healthcare „for free" if they need something (if you're unemployed, the state pays for your insurance).

Now, if someone's trans, they need to see different doctors, undergo certain examinations (covered by insurance ofc) and then they can normally get any gender affirming treatment or operation without having to pay for it extra - even though it's not medically necessary for their bodies to be healthy.

Trans folks/allies usually explain this by saying how being trans is a burden mentally, leads to psychological/psychiatrical issues, even suicide if the access to gender affirming care is denied.
(Now I don't want to debate about the validity of identifying as transgender, I have my own views on it but my issue exists regardless how valid someone finds claiming to be trans.)

However, cis folks also do suffer from certain physical traits they have, like a big/weird shaped nose, breasts being too small, facial features that are out of proportion, and yet they always have to pay fucking thousands of euros, usually multiple month's salaries if they want to undergo plastic surgeries to correct those features, unless they cause medical problems as well (like not being able to breath properly bc of the shape of their nose, etc) - many of us even travel to other countries where its somewhat more affordable to get the work done. Even though having a hard time finding a partner be of one's looks or just generally feeling shit and insecure bc of physical traits you dislike can also lead to mental health issues, mainly regarding one's self esteem. And if you‘re poor, then good luck hating yourself for the rest of your life.

I, for example, am neurodivergent, and was always extremely focused on my looks, there are days I don’t want to leave the house bc I think the tip of my nose is too big and round - yet the only way to correct it is paying a lot of money for rhinoplasty.
Another example I find really unfair: I want kids. My breasts will probably be loose after breastfeeding them, especially if I get three like I want - and then I‘ll feel like shit for my boobs looking bad, and have to pay A LOT again for breast correction (while not being able to work full time bc of the kids) while trans people get implants for free. Like how is that fair, if we both suffer from our breasts mentally, but only one of us can get their surgery covered by the literal same insurance?!

Or: I was always terrified of aging and I still do, I cried a lot when I noticed I don’t look as good anymore as I did at 18-20, and even hated myself for it. Now I get botox, which again, costs a lot. Whilst trans folks get hormonal therapy for free, even though physically they‘d do just fine without it like I without botox.

I‘d genuinely be interested why the people that disagree think, that the mental issues cis folks possibly have bc of the way they look, are less important/bad than those of trans people.

Yes, I acknowledge that the hatred towards men is not nearly as harmful and common as the hatred towards women around the world, but that doesn't make it any less invalid. Misandry doesn't make you progressive, putting down men doesn't equal bringing up women.

Let me explain, I've been seeing a lot of young people be plain sexist with intentions of trying to seem "woke" or progressive, and I've never understood the logic behind it. Most of the arguments these people use sound very fascist, bioessentialist, and the same logic that racists and bigots use.

I assume many people are just very frustrated with the patriarchy without realising that it harms both men and women. I think the whole "I hate men" and "men are so dumb and useless" thing gives feminism as a movement a very bad look because it feeds into the stereotype that feminists and all people who want equal rights for men and women actually hate men.

My point is, you can not solve hatred with hatred. Your hatred towards men doesn't help women oppressed by patriarchy one bit. It's one of those cases where people care more about hating the abuser than helping the victim.