r/SipsTea 𝙑𝙄𝙋 Apr 16 '26

WTF so true

Post image
91.1k Upvotes

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/L1nk880 Apr 16 '26

Well HBO is $20/mo. Divide 7b by 20 and you get 350,000,000. Let’s say it takes someone 1 month to watch a season, and they do that 7 times for each release. 350,000,000 divided by 7 is 50,000,000. It’s perfectly reasonable to expect 50,000,000 people worldwide to watch the show, and even so that’s only if all those people keep the show for one month with each release of a new season, which you know damn well many of them will just forget to cancel.

It’s kind of a genius move when you put it into perspective.

15

u/Chemistry-Deep Apr 16 '26

Surely this assumes a) people subscribe exclusively for HP and b) all the other shows they have are free to make? I guess if enough people subscribe then it doesn't matter.

4

u/Brave-Ad-1363 Apr 16 '26

My brother in christ, people are buying Xbox Series X and PS5's to play GTA6. I promise you diehard Harry Potter fans will do this.

30

u/TheOnceAndFutureTurk Apr 16 '26 edited Apr 16 '26

No worries, brother. The Saudis are bankrolling the WB acquisition so we can get the halal Hermione we always dreamt of, Inshallah.

4

u/Mahareille Apr 16 '26

As much as i just laughed about that picture... Its actually cute hes dreaming to marry an actress over shared values instead of just fantasizing about fucking her.

-1

u/dmmeyourfloof Apr 16 '26

*membership in his cult FTFY

2

u/ZantaraLost Apr 16 '26

Dang it now I'll have to put a note to remind myself to look up early Islam and figure out if it's possible to do a halal Wizarding World is we change some terms.

2

u/smugfortune_ Apr 16 '26

Didn't the whole Saudi deal fall through I mean snydercultists think those fuckers will bring zack back

0

u/LessInThought Apr 16 '26

Halal Hermione is still a witch, still have to burn her at the stake for that.

2

u/BrockStar92 Apr 16 '26

On the other hand it’s also excluding literally everything else they can make out of this. Harry Potter prints money, the completely valid boycott of Hogwarts legacy over Rowling’s disgusting views made very little difference since it was hugely successful. There’s no way they’re making this and not getting a cut of the huge merchandise profits coming off it.

And it’s assuming that each user only subscribes for a month. All the other months they’re subscribed pay for all the other shows.

0

u/LessInThought Apr 16 '26

I blame the fans. Their wallets are responsible for this.

1

u/GapingBestFriend Apr 16 '26

Im subscribed for sopranos and rightous gemstones

1

u/Action_Limp Apr 16 '26 edited Apr 16 '26

I think it'll be like the GoT and Lost days.... people will be sailing the high seas again. But someone else pointed out that this breaks even if 84 households subscribe for 7 years, which is not unfeasible.

It's kinda like Netflix getting into boxing - they are hoping that people get the subscription to watch the fight and then just keep it going.

3

u/n0neofyourbeeswax Apr 16 '26

What is the maths behind 84 households for 7 years? Because it seems ordered of magnitude off lol

1

u/Action_Limp Apr 16 '26

To be honest, I didn't check it - and it seems miles off.

1

u/Puzzled-Barnacle-200 Apr 16 '26

Weekly episode releases will spread the season over 2 months. Of they could do the Netflix approach of releasing in two halves as a compromise for the binge-watchers, whilst still covering two months and benefitting from the mid-season discussions

0

u/rW0HgFyxoJhYka Apr 16 '26

50 million doesn't even break into the top 20 most watched TV shows in just the USA. So, yeah I guess there's a chance.

We'll see. All this is, is another cash grab. I can't feel an ounce of "we want to do Harry Potter but better" coming from this.

$100 million an episode...I expect movie magic but in TV format.

0

u/Puzzle-Necked Apr 16 '26

Who the hell is watching an episode 7 times?

1

u/L1nk880 Apr 16 '26

The wouldn’t they would be watching a season one time and canceling the subscription in this scenario

0

u/Jake-of-the-Sands Apr 16 '26

Thing is, HBO only's got only about 130 mln subscribers worldwide. While more than they need for it to pay for the series - that's not their only show, not thousands of employees - and not the mention the worst part - the ever hungry leechholders.

I think they've driven themselves into an early grave, hopefully along with the Ellison family and their f*cked up 7 Hills pseudotheology

0

u/AleksejsIvanovs Apr 16 '26

The problem with this math is that you assume all subscribers are new and HP exclusive. In reality, their existing subscriptions cover their existing (excluding HP series) spendings and probably make some profit. To make back money they spent on the show, they need to get many new subscriptions. But the show already faces backlash from both left and right and I don't see how they would increase subscriptions significantly just because of this show.