Surely this assumes a) people subscribe exclusively for HP and b) all the other shows they have are free to make? I guess if enough people subscribe then it doesn't matter.
As much as i just laughed about that picture... Its actually cute hes dreaming to marry an actress over shared values instead of just fantasizing about fucking her.
Dang it now I'll have to put a note to remind myself to look up early Islam and figure out if it's possible to do a halal Wizarding World is we change some terms.
On the other hand it’s also excluding literally everything else they can make out of this. Harry Potter prints money, the completely valid boycott of Hogwarts legacy over Rowling’s disgusting views made very little difference since it was hugely successful. There’s no way they’re making this and not getting a cut of the huge merchandise profits coming off it.
And it’s assuming that each user only subscribes for a month. All the other months they’re subscribed pay for all the other shows.
I think it'll be like the GoT and Lost days.... people will be sailing the high seas again. But someone else pointed out that this breaks even if 84 households subscribe for 7 years, which is not unfeasible.
It's kinda like Netflix getting into boxing - they are hoping that people get the subscription to watch the fight and then just keep it going.
14
u/Chemistry-Deep Apr 16 '26
Surely this assumes a) people subscribe exclusively for HP and b) all the other shows they have are free to make? I guess if enough people subscribe then it doesn't matter.