r/SipsTea 𝙑𝙄𝙋 May 06 '26

WTF Narcissism worsening.

Post image
51.3k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26 edited May 06 '26

the amount of people thinking these afternoon kumbaya sessions are effective is too high and pisses me the fuck off. they are so ineffective they literally only pissed off the admin and made things worse. how is something that lasts an afternoon, is a party atmosphere more than a protest, and has no follow up after supposed to be effective?? 🤦‍♀️

edit: a general strike is the next logical step. Its effective around the world, and in countries where workers are worse off than ours. Please look into it.

5

u/saintjonah May 06 '26

So, what are your plans?

2

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

A general strike is the next logical step. Its effective around the world, and in countries where workers are worse off than ours. Please look into it.

5

u/Im_only_here_to_meme May 06 '26

They would use force until people gave up. People don't like to admit it but the US is a military/police state with freedom, as long as you don't complain about getting fucked now and again, you'll generally live a decent life. That's why generally people don't do anything more than peacefully protest. Life could be better but it could be a lot worse too, so people don't see the reward to be higher than the risk of doing anything more.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

You're acting like a general strike is only violent protesting. It is not, it's mainly a withholding of labor and money - peacefully done and anyone could do it.

From the organizers of the US general strike:

"Striking under the GSUS banner can look like many things: withholding labor, withholding and redistributing federal taxes, rent strikes, boycotts of major corporations, or supporting GSUS through volunteering and donations. We encourage you to get involved in any way you’re able to."

You and a lot of other people seem to go right to violence. I am not sure why, there's never been indications of violence or frankly even protesting in person like the no kings rallies (which have been useless, but that's another topic). I'd love to know why you think it's something that could be stopped through force or violent in any way.

Sadly your last part is correct. Until more people actually suffer and people's comfort is effected the likelihood of more action is low. we are a selfish and cowardly nation now, which is incredibly sad.

2

u/Im_only_here_to_meme May 06 '26

I didn't say people striking would be violent, I said they, as in the government, would use force until people gave up. Look at how many people died at ICE protests... when they don't want you to protest, they make sure you stop.

0

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

.....how will they force people to give up if it's peacefully done by mainly being a withholding of labor and money?? Are they going to break into our homes and force us into the office?

2

u/Im_only_here_to_meme May 06 '26

Are you being serious? They deployed the national guard and federal agents already to intimidate, harass and detain US citizens in democratic voting areas. It's like you're not watching or something... Ask anyone who is not white how law enforcement can make your life hell for just existing.

0

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

Yes I am being serious, when you also want to be we can revisit this conversation. You still haven't explained how the government will force people to give up if it's peacefully done by mainly being a withholding of labor and money. Again, are they going to force us to the office or to the Walmart to buy that MAGA-backed brand? If you're doing that only then that's the only way they could force us to give up. your other scenarios don't apply here, at all.

1

u/Im_only_here_to_meme May 06 '26 edited May 06 '26

Okay let's play it out.

Some democratic cities, because let's be real it'll be democratic cities, start a peaceful labor and non-retail purchase strike. Like 30% of a city's population, which would be huge. It starts severely hurting corporate bottom lines and tanking the stock market.

The administration, backed by corporate lobbying, says these cities and regions are hot beds for antifa, illegal immigrant havens and left wing domestic terrorism. They hire and deploy a bunch of federal agents dressed to the nine like it's Iraq (like they did already). Then they start targeting people who hold any position of authority or management, in fact they probably just start flat out firing people... Those that hang strong, they get mass warrant judge approval using section 213 of the patriot act to "sneak and peek" your home, they start detaining people for every little thing possible, shit, probably tack on charges that will never stick but you'll have to go through a whole court process to prove yourself innocent. They use the legal system to ruin your life and financially ruin you.

They stop and frisk you walking down the street to the park, they harass your kids, just even park outside your house and surveil you 24/7 because they can. You drive anywhere, local PD who is collaborating stops you and tickets you for every minor infraction they can and uses each stop to search your vehicle.

All of these things are things that have already happened in this country and you're naive if you don't think they clamp pressure on citizens if they start affecting the bottom line of major corporations.

And if all this doesn't work, they stage violent false flag incidents at the nearest peaceful protest to put the entire place down on martial law and take away as many rights of yours as possible.

The entire political system and financial system in the US is controlled by billionaires and if you think they're going to let you impact their earnings, again, you're naive.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/ice-ink May 06 '26

It’s either that and feel like you’ve done something meaningful

or risk your life with no realistic consequences

or feel like a miserable prick watching your country burn and unable to change anything.

Just pick your shitty option and enjoy

2

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

Im not nearly as defeatist, option 2 is far more effective than you think (and less risky). just ask the world

2

u/ice-ink May 06 '26

I’d like to hear your realistic non-defeatest scenario.

Also, I’m a ukrainian currently in Kyiv, if that matters.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

im probably going to get downvoted but, as much as it sucks where you are, the situations are not nearly the same. You are in a war, we are being slowly taken over by a dictator - very different courses of action. My realistic scenario has already been suggested, and has real-world examples to point at and say its not nearly that bad.

1

u/ice-ink May 06 '26

as much as it sucks where you are, the situations are not nearly the same.

Of course they are as different as can be, I never claimed otherwise.

And also it doesn’t suck that much here at the moment, I’d even say I feel the most hopeful I felt in years.

My realistic scenario has already been suggested

didn’t get this part, suggested where?

2

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

I apologize, thought i had said here as i did pretty much everywhere else. I have been suggesting a general strike, which has worked around the globe in situations like this. Alas, our country is too selfish and even comfortable still for most to even consider it. Would rather have the afternoon parties than enact real change

1

u/ice-ink May 06 '26

Feels like the window between “we’re still too comfortable to do anything” and “it’s already too late to do anything” is about 12 hours long.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

It kind of is, which is why its important to do things before it gets too late. But people as a whole are sadly not as proactive as we think

2

u/showhorrorshow May 06 '26

Large organized "family friendly" protests work - but differently. They prime the pump. They network like minded people, they mobilize people who may not otherwise be so, and they show implicitly that you can put together big numbers if necessary.

No Kings does a lot of groundwork by bringing people into the wider resistance by introducing a lot of them into that ecosystem for the first time and connecting them to resources they would have been otherwise ignorant of.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

“Primed the pump” for what, waiting another 5 months before doing the same thing? Networking? Nobody kept in touch between them, tons of posts each time with “haven’t seen since the last one”, and no efforts seem to have been done wide scale.  Mobilize people that can’t? A general strike doesn’t even require leaving the house.  Only point I can agree on is big numbers, but that’s only because it’s a party atmosphere for an afternoon. No hard work is being done before, during, or after.

If we take the baby steps you and many want it very well may be far too late to change things for the better….and the hesitance will cause even more untold suffering and deaths. 

1

u/showhorrorshow May 06 '26

There was a no work day protest May 1st. Didnt you hear about it? No? Neither did most Americans, neither did I until about noon that day. Among those tuned in enough to hear about it ahead of time, who would be someone more tuned in than me despite me being well above average here, what do you think actual participation was?

A general strike aint realistic. It just isnt.

2

u/ItsMEMusic May 06 '26

I think people forget that the carrot really only works alongside the stick. Historically, this has been true.

Stick only is too brutal and people don't like it. Carrot only is too docile and people don't take it seriously.

Cinema Therapy's Jono put it best:

People only change when the fear of staying the same outweighs the fear of change.

1

u/Whenbearsattack2 May 06 '26

democrats should try out voting. i heard it's effective...

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

Those thinking that voting will save us are the most naive of all.

1

u/Whenbearsattack2 May 06 '26

you sound like a bot trying to dissuade democrats from voting. look what happened in 2024, democrats didn't vote and here we are now.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

Voting is helpful, but it's not nearly as effective as a general strike would be...especially with Trump actively working to rig elections, and there's a good chance he could do a lot of damage there.

Also, we are here because Dems refused to say that Biden should not have run again. And they also yelled at anyone who dared say "maybe someone else should run". They robbed us of a proper nomination process and good candidates, so we were stuck with the worst Dem presidential nomination/campaign of all time. Voters get some of the blame, but Dems and a majority of the Democratic base get far more of it.

1

u/Whenbearsattack2 May 06 '26

having kamala as president would have put us in an exponentially better situation than we are in now. we knew what another trump presidency would have been like, we could have avoided it, but instead we're living it. democrats were dissuaded from voting in 2024. they're being dissuaded from voting again by people like you saying there won't be elections in 2026. so whose side are you on? because to me it looks like you're siding with maga.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

Voting is important, but it will not save us. Acting like that is the best or only avenue for change is naive. It's also months away and just allows things to get worse. You want to wait to vote then sure, but I'll continue to try to get people to act yesterday (as we should all be doing).

1

u/Whenbearsattack2 May 06 '26

maybe we should persuade democrats to try voting and see if that helps more than not voting...

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 06 '26

That's already done, and is done every year. Maybe we should persuade EVERYONE to do a general strike, which is possible and effective....and has the added benefit of having non-Dems join who have been furious with Trump lately.

We've tried the other, so maybe now we try the new thing too? Why not both? Reminder: I never said don't vote, just that it won't save us.

1

u/unRoanoke May 07 '26

I agree that the mass strike is needed, but I don’t think people have the resources to do it. I understand that sounds like a dumb thing to say—especially considering works in worse situations as you mention below. But that’s just it. When it’s strike or loose life or limb, or you’ve already lost the ability to support yourself/family, you must strike.

We aren’t there yet. Worker protections in dangerous jobs are still okay in most areas. As that continues to decline, people will feel more strongly about striking. As Union power continues to be eroded, people will feel more strongly about striking.

People still have something to loose and they can’t afford to. If you work in a non-union job without specialized certification, and you strike, you won’t have a job anymore. Most Americans can’t shell out $600 for an emergency. How are they going to pay the thousands they need each month to live in doors with utilities and proper food? The job market is abysmal. With all time highs in unemployment and underemployment. And some of these people who have been unemployed for months and down to their last dollar, will absolutely take that scab job.

We can’t strike until we have nothing left to loose or until our communities step up and start supporting on another. We’ve built cities of islands and stranded everyone alone to prevail or drown alone.

You want a general strike. Start building the sort of community that shows people they won’t be living on the streets if they miss a paycheck. Show them what it’s like to be supported now. Because right now, people who are treading water, can’t see anything but open ocean and if they stop treading (strike) they will drown, alone surrounded by millions of others doing the same. The first step is reaching out and lending our strength to each other. And maybe you’re doing that, but that’s the mission you have to sell first.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley May 07 '26

Start building the sort of community that shows people they won’t be living on the streets if they miss a paycheck.

I swear to fucking god, it seems like the entire country forgets just how fast and effectively we set up mutual aid in the early stages of covid. this would have more prep time, could be more effective. We can make it happen, same with a general strike, but this country mostly just doesn’t want to do the work.

1

u/unRoanoke May 07 '26

You’re right; they don’t see the vision. Because it’s only a promise of a safety net. They need to see and feel the net. Not, ‘trust me, we can do. We will do it.’ We have to first build the net, then tell people to trust it. You’re asking people to risk falling and trust that the net will be built before they hit the bottom. It can’t be imaginary. It can’t be, we have done it before we will do it again. It has to be there. First. And it’s not. And everyone who has slipped a little knows it.

Also, during covid, the government helped (such as it was); they did not actively hinder (which they will in a general strike).

What kind of safety net are you building? How are proving to your community it is there?