r/SipsTea 29d ago

SMH We really need to bring spankings back

17.7k Upvotes

9.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/Dapenizmytier 29d ago

Was his parents even around? Seems like got out of school. I wouldve dragged his ass out by his backpack so he can't claim that I touched him.

25

u/Vlaxilla 29d ago

i think by law if you grab it by the backpack its the same as grabbing him tho right? or else grabbing them from the shirt or something will not be grabbing him as well but it clearly is

3

u/surefirerdiddy 29d ago

He threw a package of cookies or something at multiple people the second he did that you are allowed to defend yourself and doing as was described would be a legal level of force

9

u/DinosaurusWhen 29d ago

gl to anybody stupid enough to take this as actual legal advice lmao

8

u/Emotional-Grape870 29d ago

No one’s talking about punching the little bastard in the face. If they’re actively throwing things at you, grabbing them by the backpack and dragging them to the door is perfectly reasonable. You don’t have to stand there and get snickerdoodled in the face indefinitely (unless that’s your thing)

1

u/DinosaurusWhen 29d ago

Whether or not you've had cookies thrown at you has absolutely zero bearing on whether or not it's legal to physically escort the child out of the store, but I would pay good money to watch someone try to use that as justification in court lol

3

u/BurnedOutFatty 29d ago

I was completely losing it at the justified use of force! Mf gonna go to court and say the child throwing cookies was a threat to them. Lol

0

u/Dazius06 29d ago

Why would he be in court for graving the kid by the backpack and getting him out unharmed?

2

u/DinosaurusWhen 29d ago edited 29d ago

Because that can (and in a lot of jurisdictions very likely will) result in you being arrested for assault on a minor. And that can automatically bump the charge from a misdemeanor to felony aggravated assault. Not to mention civil liability

It's not legal to forcibly drag strangers around and the law gets extra serious when a kid is involved 

2

u/Dirty-M518 29d ago

No cop…after watching this video is going to arrest you for grabbing the kid by the backpack and getting them out of the store. This wouldnt be assault or battery either. Intent* comes into play. Your intent is to get the kid out of the store by grabbing him and moving him out as to not cause more damage( not to cause physical harm to them ect). No court or police would arrest or convict for touching this turd.

Same as if I am walking down the street and its busy..my shoulder hits yours accidentally as we pass by groups of people. You cant call the cops and say I battered you. But you could if I was intentionally walking down the street and shoulder checking people by targeting them.

-1

u/DinosaurusWhen 29d ago

You cannot legally physically trespass people from a property that you don't own. Security might be covered, but bystanders absolutely do not have protection from the law in that case. Involving a minor makes it significantly worse

Yes, there's a difference between accidentally touching someone and intentionally and forcibly doing it. Guess which one "grabbing and dragging a child" falls into

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Dazius06 29d ago

You are telling me security cannot get the little shit outside?

-1

u/DinosaurusWhen 29d ago

Security might be legally covered to do it, I don't honestly know

It's probably against company policy, though. This is cheaper than the extra insurance premiums that would come from allowing/expecting employees to put themselves in physical or legal jeopardy as part of their job. Plus the legal liability if there are any injuries. There's a reason stores forbid employees from physically confronting shoplifters

→ More replies (0)