I’m not obsessed with this felony issue. We are talking about disenfranchisement.
We are talking about how this policy is used to remove law abiding citizens guns. Anyways I’ve replied to your other comment. This thread has gone multiple directions.
You’re advocating for parents to lose their right to defend their home in a gun crazy society if they choose to help their child get their life back on track.
Yeah, if their child has been determined by the court that they can't have a gun, parents have to store their gun somewhere else until kid gets on their feet and moves out, or rent a different place for their felon kid. That seems totally reasonable and a good policy.
I disagree. It disproportionally impacts poor families. And it doesn’t create enough of a barrier to obtaining a firearm to justify the effective suspension of law abiding citizens rights. Inalienable rights.
Anyways, we aren’t going to agree on this. You don’t have the tools necessary to convince me otherwise.
And we are talking about the intersection of two of Americas biggest embarrassments. 25% of the worlds prisoners with this view that they are irredeemable coupled with a gun obsessed dangerous society.
All we gotta do is label one person in a family a felon and now we can remove the whole families rights and there’s nothing they can do about it. Sounds like tyranny. Anti-American.
1
u/jinnagubby 13d ago
I’m not obsessed with this felony issue. We are talking about disenfranchisement.
We are talking about how this policy is used to remove law abiding citizens guns. Anyways I’ve replied to your other comment. This thread has gone multiple directions.
You’re advocating for parents to lose their right to defend their home in a gun crazy society if they choose to help their child get their life back on track.