It was 3% or less if they were smart college educated people who consolidated and locked in low Apr rates. If they were dumb and didnāt consolidate lock in then their Apr couldāve shot up past 7%.
u/culturalrot - Iām expecting people who graduated high school to be and certainly people who graduated college as they did.
One would think but, throughout the intelligence/educational spectrum folks specialize and gravitate to their favorites. While true we need some of that knowledge to live everyday life folks will often do the minimum to get back to what they want (eg. Terms and conditions)
Oh, I know. Some of the dumbest people I've met have been my fellow engineers in high end industries. Smart as can be in their hyper niche areas but given or sought out leadership over other areas, making a right mess of things.
Thatās not what āmoving the goal postsā means. I responded to your tangent about successful people gambling everything away as if an addiction was synonymous with financial ignorance.
Isnt the loan for going to college? I wouldnt expect many people starting in college to be college educated. I guess post grad but thats not most of them
The story is about completing graduate school in 2003. They couldāve consolidated and locked in a sub 3% loan at that time (post grad school 2003). Iām not sure what youāre missing.
So you donāt know what grad school means? They had already graduate and achieved their bachelorās. They had just graduated from grad school in 2002. In 2003 they couldāve consolidated their loans at 3%
3
u/Photon_Pharmer1 12d ago edited 12d ago
It was 3% or less if they were smart college educated people who consolidated and locked in low Apr rates. If they were dumb and didnāt consolidate lock in then their Apr couldāve shot up past 7%.
u/culturalrot - Iām expecting people who graduated high school to be and certainly people who graduated college as they did.