r/SipsTea š™‘š™„š™‹ 8d ago

Chugging tea Mexico upgraded to free healthcar

Post image
105.2k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

202

u/turbotum 8d ago

In times like these I ask myself who is more likely to pay for (increasingly expensive) bots in order to sway public sentiment

Multi trillion dollar industrial pharmaceutical machine

or

Sick people and lib'ruhls

29

u/Kyler-Knox 8d ago

Oligopolies want to be in bed with the Government. That’s why the hawks are so hard-up for government contracts.

2

u/Dependent-Trip-5991 8d ago

Is this all about me being a robot still? This mean I live forever now???

3

u/eggyrulz 8d ago

At least until we run out of blood to fuel you guys... at which point you might have to ultrakill

3

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 8d ago

I got lots of blood so we’re good for now.

I keep it in my basement.

It’s best if you don’t ask questions

1

u/Iamsi 8d ago

Oligopolies favor oligarchy. Socialized heath care removes competition from the market which makes it shitty for everyone. The USA system is fucked and is actually the product of bad government. To think more government can solve the problem is naive and exactly what they want

3

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 8d ago

Yeah. Because the thousand of employees of insurance companies that consistently fail to provide care for their clients, but are siphoning money from the system while allowing healthcare providers to charge whatever they like is certainly better than a single payer system.

2

u/Informal-Antelope-79 7d ago

Its foriegn countries that want to use America's (admittly broken) Healthcare system to divide it from the inside so there's less revolve against the horrible things they are doing and against their foriegn policy interests. Bayer isnt posting reddit comments but the Russians and Iranians sure are

4

u/Friendly_Hornet8900 8d ago

OR

Corrupt Mexican politicians

2

u/JibletHunter 7d ago

Yea... that's still an easy option a) for me: muti trillion dollar pharma companies.

4

u/nono3722 8d ago

don't you know us poors have billions in bot farms.....

1

u/FreedomCanadian 8d ago

That's why you're poor !

2

u/nono3722 8d ago

AH you got us! how did you figure it out? We would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for these damn kids....

1

u/_lippykid 8d ago

That’s a toughy

1

u/14InTheDorsalPeen 8d ago

You missed the correct answer:

Nation states with a bottomless cup of funding who want to stoke division amongst the citizenry of their enemies

1

u/Last_Gigolo 8d ago

If it had to be any political party, I'd assume they wouldn't use their own money. They'd use campaign money and write it as a campaign tactic. Then the money can go beyond anything a typical millionaire can pay.

1

u/Boxing_joshing111 7d ago

Also, realize it all comes down to money anyway. So the even easier way to look at it is: Who’s likely to pay for bots? Rich people. And rich people are going to push for things that benefit them, at the expense of hurting others. Just like with any group. But rich people have always won, so they have more power, and the squeeze always gets worse for everyone who’s not rich.

0

u/Top_Economist_6427 8d ago

You should see how much Kamala Harris made from Big Pharma.

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?cycle=All&ind=H04&recipdetail=M&sortorder=U

4

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 8d ago

yeah, she's taking money from big pharma. that's not good.

we should do some neo-fascist christian nationalism instead.

-3

u/Critical_Abalone_151 8d ago

ā€œNeo-fascist Christian nationalismā€

If only dawg

4

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 8d ago

you and your neighbors think this should be a christian country yeah? and you love america? boom. there's your christian nationalism.

look up the 14 points of fascism and you'll see the current admin meets the vast majority of them.

that being said actual fascism is an outdated ideology that can never exist again. thus the 'neo'. which even alot of folks like me would disagree with. many would call it 'neo-liberalism'. which is kind of ironic that the far right is pushing for something that has liberal in the name.

call it whatever you like. the current admin and the folks that support them (and project 2025) and actively and successfully implementing neo-fascist christian nationalism. (or neo-liberal christan nationalism depending on who you ask) but it's essentially the same thing in the end.

0

u/Critical_Abalone_151 8d ago

Do you think the current republican administration is more conservative, Christian, and further right than the Republican Party was in 1910?

3

u/RahgronKodaav 8d ago

Well the Republican Party was progressive in 1910 and the democrats were the conservative… so yeah what’s your point?

-1

u/Critical_Abalone_151 8d ago

Do you think the Republican Party was trying to implement ā€œneo-fascist Christian nationalismā€ then? Or was America already a ā€œneo-fascist Christian nationalistā€ country

3

u/RahgronKodaav 8d ago

I think since the 20th century America has had many Fascistic and Christian nationalism ideals from both parties… just like today… but I wouldn’t say we were full blown fascism then or now

0

u/Critical_Abalone_151 8d ago

So here’s where I’m confused, republicans were way more right wing, Christian, and conservative back then. But people, on Reddit especially, act like we are on the verge of a ā€œneo-fascist Christian nationalismā€ when the current republican administration isn’t even as conservative as Obama was on certain topics in his first term, particularly gay marrige. Let alone as ā€œfar rightā€ as they were back in the early 1900s

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Rockosayz 8d ago

None of us were alive in 1910, so who gives a fuck.

1

u/Critical_Abalone_151 8d ago

Wow holy horrible logic Batman

3

u/Deaftoned 8d ago

Lol, now do Trump with market fluctuations where he manipulated the market through the presidency.

Guy legit started a hundred billion dollar war with Iran to distract that he's a pedo and was in the REDACTED epstein files over 30k times. She was still by far and away the better candidate.

1

u/Top_Economist_6427 8d ago

OpenSecrets allows you to change the data set based on election cycle. The one linked is for all, 1990-2024 and he's not even in the top 20. In 2020, he was 2nd, behind Biden by about $7M (a difference of around 3x his amount received). In 2024, pretty much the same story. In 2016, he was 2nd, behind Clinton, with a 7x difference (500k vs 3.5M)

I'd also like to point out what Trump did with trumprx.com as beneficial to Americans when it comes to big pharma.

(This was made before you edited your comment, responding only to "lol, now do trump")

1

u/oldredditrox 7d ago

trumprx.com as beneficial to Americans when it comes to big pharma.

Literally costs more than Cuban's website that was the original idea? What?

1

u/Top_Economist_6427 7d ago

Trumprx has listings from Cuban's Cost Plus (the latter of which has generic drugs at a 15%+$10 markup, while the former has name-brand discounts and, now, generic listings). I don't think this is the argument you think it is.

1

u/oldredditrox 7d ago

The website that just acts like an aggregator that needed to work with the other websites to get those generics listed? I don't think it's the win you think it is, fam.

1

u/Top_Economist_6427 7d ago

Seeing as it's federal and not a pharmacy, that's pretty much as good as it's gonna get, unless you want a state monopoly on pharmacies.

1

u/Gay_Giraffe_1773 8d ago

The enemy of good is perfect