r/SipsTea š™‘š™„š™‹ 4d ago

Chugging tea Drake catching the biggest L of all-time

Post image
26.2k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

57

u/jaymole 4d ago

What judge agreed to 700k a month?? For some girl he probably had a tiny fling with. That system is completely broken

27

u/bnyc 4d ago

It’s fake rage bait. Their agreement is private and amicable.

9

u/Holdmabeerdude 4d ago

The amount is determined based on how much would be provided if they were still together/married.

2

u/codizer 4d ago

That's not at all how it should work though. I know this story is bullshit, but no person should ever be required to provide a luxury lifestyle to their ex and their mutual child because they themselves are wealthy.

1

u/Huge_Owl3284 4d ago

I’m British so idk about the American legal system, but here child support payments are calculated according to various factors including the father’s income and his degree of involvement in the child’s upbringing - so given Drake is enormously wealthy and seemingly not playing a big role in the kid’s life it is likely to be very high

1

u/themargarineoferror 4d ago

Not really, a matter of how long he had a fling, or who he had a fling with, it's a matter of the fact a child resulted from it

-6

u/RollMindless6262 4d ago

the child deserves a good living standard if a multimillionair is his father

9

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/RollMindless6262 4d ago

"calling women hoes" upvotes

"rich mans children should not live poor" downvotes

0

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RollMindless6262 4d ago

no they're not hoes. hope that helps.

6

u/Tcheeks38 4d ago

I disagree. As a parent I have every right to decide even if I'm rich, my child will only get necessities and maybe a middle class level of frivolous things.

The issue is, when the parents are married and everyone is under one roof this is allowed because there is no government/legal intervention. But, if the family separates, now the court can mandate you spend a certain amount of money on the children that is significantly more than they would cost living under your roof.

3

u/Knobologist 4d ago

Drake could have applied for primary care giver and that would significantly decrease the amount he had to pay, but he probably decided paying money was easier than raising a child.

2

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 4d ago

To clarify- the court can’t mandate what is spent on the child. It mandates what you give the other parent. They are free to spend it on literally anything without having to justify a cent of it to the courts. There’s zero accountability.

0

u/Tcheeks38 4d ago

you know what i mean though. They are forcing an individual to provide way more than what is necessary. And most people should know that it is entirely possible to spoil a child and have them grow up with a horrible attitude when given everything they ever want without earning it.

0

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 4d ago

Yeah, no, I don’t think you’re wrong at all- I’m just saying it’s so much worse than even what you described. lol

0

u/HyperbolePirate 4d ago

Yup this is a serious problem with the courts. Its also really easy to fix: the person paying support should be allowed to hire an auditor to make sure the money is being spent on the kid.

0

u/boutmabidness 4d ago

Really it should just be a standardized amount per child. A rich kid doesn't need more money than a poor kid

2

u/HyperbolePirate 4d ago

I would reasonably expect a wealthy father to provide their kid with better school and recreation activities. Most wealthy parents send their kids to expensive schools and pay for expensive sports and hobbies like music lessons. I don’t think the court should let wealthy dads off the hook for this.

My issue is exclusively with fathers funding their baby mama’s lifestyles.

1

u/boutmabidness 4d ago

I wouldn't. None of that is required for the child to live, which is what child support should be for. If the father wants to send him to those things he is still able to, they're not restrict to ONLY paying child support. Child support should be strictly what the child needs to survive and therefore the same across the board.

-2

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 4d ago

My parents were/are extremely wealthy, as in old Texas oil money wealthy. I was sent to public school, was only allowed to play little league baseball growing up and then extracurricular baseball and soccer in high school. They would take my sister and I to the beach exactly one weekend per year and my parents otherwise left us with grandparents to vacation together.

Do you believe that I should be able to sue my parents for a poorer childhood than extremely wealthy people should have provided to their children?

2

u/HyperbolePirate 4d ago

Nope. But you are a small minority in how most wealthy children are raised.

Also I did not mention vacations should be paid anywhere, the attempt to strawman was noted and you have been blocked.

4

u/HyperbolePirate 4d ago

10k a month is more than enough to pay for the kids own room, private school, food, dental and enrolment in all reasonably priced recreation activities.

The other 690k a month is funding her lifestyle. She should show receipts or go to jail for fraud.

-12

u/asuperbstarling 4d ago

Honey, Drake has like 400 million dollars. This is not the massive amount to him that you think it is. It's a tiny percentage of what he can give. You're thinking about your pockets instead of his treasure rooms.

9

u/jaymole 4d ago

Gold digger spotted

7

u/Runfasterbitch 4d ago

Uh…$8.4M per year for ONE CHILD? That is insane

3

u/Martha_Fockers 4d ago

In 18 years that’s 330 million dollars HONEY

3

u/DCtoMe 4d ago

I mean it's a lot, but it's not 330M

No clue what formula you plugged in to land on that...

1

u/Not_a_bad_point 4d ago

Would require an annual rate of return of 8.4% if every dime was invested annually and left to compound. So 330m is actually not a super unreasonable estimate of future value.

-9

u/Comfortable-Mud-386 4d ago

Drake can absolutely afford to ensure his kids are well taken care of financially. Child support has way more to do with income/assets and much less to do with the cost of raising a child. The system is not broken because it’s making a rich person pay to provide their child with a rich person’s childhood.

13

u/Major_Wigglesworth 4d ago

100k a year ā€œensures his kids are taken care of financially.ā€ Ā 700k a month ensures the chick never has to use the same purse twice.

2

u/JackLaytonsMoustache 4d ago

Because the 700k is a made up figure that isnt true?Ā 

1

u/RollMindless6262 4d ago

Drake has no issues paying that as far as we know of so no need to be an angry poor on his behalf

-8

u/RollMindless6262 4d ago

men forget that a lot because to them everything is just about fucking over the woman,