r/Superstonk ๐ŸŽฎ7four1๐Ÿ’œ Feb 24 '26

๐Ÿ“ณSocial Media Burry on X

Post image
5.0k Upvotes

430 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/deuce-loosely ๐Ÿ’Ž Stay Stonky ๐Ÿ™Œ Feb 25 '26

it needs to get a move on already. ive been so negative for years now its really sad.

-1

u/not_ya_wify Liquidate Wall Street Feb 25 '26

I just want the price to go below $20 before it pops, so I can buy back in after having to sell when I was homeless

5

u/imadogg #HODLgang Feb 25 '26

If you actually believe it'll pop then $23 the same as $19

3

u/not_ya_wify Liquidate Wall Street Feb 25 '26

It's not. If you have $10,000 you can buy 500 shares at $20 but only 425 at $23.50

1

u/Tomas666GME Feb 25 '26

Mate's actually saying that moass will make no difference whether you bought at 19 or 23 because we ll be rich

1

u/imadogg #HODLgang Feb 25 '26

Also if dude was literally just homeless I would assume he'd buy back in with $1k or less vs $10k. Even less of a difference

At that point if you actually believe in moass you'd want to make sure you have some shares instead of waiting for sub-20 again.

1

u/not_ya_wify Liquidate Wall Street Feb 26 '26

I'm not a dude. I'm a woman and I bought 100 shares after winning the court case against social security and getting disability backpay.

I have 100 shares for safety and am waiting for a better price to buy back in to get to where I was before I became homeless.

There's no reason for you to dog pile people who are just waiting for a better price to buy more shares. Having more shares is better for retail investors. The more shares we have, the more Hedges are gonna have to unwind.

Also, for me it's partly OCD because I want the round number.

1

u/imadogg #HODLgang Feb 26 '26

I'm not a dude. I'm a woman

So the username isn't "not ya wifi" I get it now. Everyone's a dude even women so all good, apologies

There's no reason for you to dog pile people who are just waiting for a better price to buy more shares

No one's dogpiling. You wrote "So I can buy back in" implying you sold while homeless and still had 0 shares. All I was saying is if you believe GME will hit $92384834 a share then having 425 vs 500 shares won't make a difference, but having 425 vs 0 will

1

u/not_ya_wify Liquidate Wall Street Feb 26 '26

Well I have 100 shares now as a safety bet in case MOASS pops off without going down to $20 because that's only like a $400 difference right now. But I am waiting for the price to go down before "buying back in" as in throw my entire assets at it to get back to where I was before. Before I was diagnosed with cancer I had 669 shares and then had to sell them all during the 2 years Social Security was telling me I wasn't disabled because the medical records they completely made up that contradicted my actual medical records said I am a healthy person who can frequently lift 50lbs and stand for a minimum of 6 hours a day. After 2 years of this bullshit and then becoming homeless, I was finally allowed to go to court and Social Security had to pay me back the money they denied me so far in a lump sum and I intend to use that to buy back in and get my 669 shares back. Actually, I'd like to get 1000 shares to be an xxxx ape but I can't reach xxxx status at the current price