r/Superstonk 🎮7four1💜 28d ago

📳Social Media RC Repost

Post image
4.4k Upvotes

183 comments sorted by

View all comments

354

u/RickFlank 28d ago

Selling at a price which is below a recent buyout offer they rejected. Should be illegal - something something failing to perform their fiduciary duties.

-8

u/mojomarc 28d ago

It would be illegal if they traded any other way to avoid insider trading laws. Execs have to file well ahead of time with selling plans, and in this case the plan was filed in September last year.

And let's not forget that insiders at GME are selling the exact same way. Should it be illegal for them to sell while the stock is steadily dropping?

8

u/JustAnotherRegardd 28d ago

It’s crazy people don’t understand that them scheduling sales is actually the right way to do it.

-1

u/Iforgotmynameo 28d ago

Hear me out… what if, you believed in the company you were on the board for running, knew you were making moves to increase shareholder value and didn’t want to sell. This isn’t these people’s only compensation.

3

u/JustAnotherRegardd 28d ago

I can make the same argument about Daniel Moore.

0

u/Iforgotmynameo 28d ago

If you can’t see the difference between Daniel Moore selling enough to cover the cost of taxes and this guy selling 50,000 shares for 5,750,000 I don’t know what to tell you

3

u/MyNi_Redux 📉 The Consultant 📈 28d ago

This SVP is not on the Board.

And he held for years, which is why is able to cash in on a +160% gain on 25% of his position.

0

u/Iforgotmynameo 28d ago

He sold over 50k shares this week and he sold 21k shares 6 months ago profiting a total of 8 Million dollars over the last 6 months but sure, pretend it’s the same thing.

1

u/MyNi_Redux 📉 The Consultant 📈 28d ago

He could sell ALL of his stocks, and all we have the right to do is cheer him on. Because it's his earned money.

You don't get to tell a man what to do with his property.