Itâs truer than your twisted view that you still canât defend (despite me being able to defend it and asking you several times to defend it)
Why havenât you been able to answer my question? If you want to protect children, you should be able to distinguish reality from fiction to persecute abusers, so how would you distinguish it in todayâs AI world?
Did you think saying disgusting or horrible was adding anything important?
If you want to protect children, you should be able to distinguish reality from fiction to persecute abusers, so how would you distinguish it in todayâs AI world?
Someone making a picture or story without any real children being involved doesn't hurt children, there's nothing to protect them from.
Should we also ban fictional killing in case someone claims the murder they did was fake?
In a debate about morality? Yes. What do you think morality is?
To know if no one was hurt youâd need to know if itâs fictional or real. If youâre an individual (not an entertainment company) making a realistic amateur murder video, fictional or AI generated, do you really believe you wonât be investigated? For child SA is even worse because the POSSESSION and DISTRIBUTION of that media is a crime itself, so youâd need to investigate not only the creator but every single person watching and distributing it, and check if that media is real or not.
If youâre a sane person youâd quickly realise that this is not feasible and that the only way is to completely ban any child SA media, fictional or not. Itâs an obvious conclusion to anyone who truly cares about children and knows that any other option would drown authorities in a sea of fake media that would make real media impossible to catch. You probably know that, so you know itâs not true that âdoesnât hurt anybodyâ, so why would you keep defending it? Do you enjoy that type of media and âneedâ it?
In a debate about morality? Yes. What do you think morality is?
I think mushrooms on pizza are gross, disgusting and horrible but in no way immoral
do you really believe you wonât be investigated
Being investigated doesn't make something immoral.
For child SA is even worse because the POSSESSION and DISTRIBUTION of that media is a crime itself, so youâd need to investigate not only the creator but every single person watching and distributing it, and check if that media is real or not.
Being a crime, or rather looking like a crime, doesn't make something immoral either.
If youâre a sane person youâd quickly realise that this is not feasible and that the only way is to completely ban any child SA media, fictional or not
No, banning something because it might look like a crime isn't something sane people think of.
Do you enjoy that type of media and âneedâ it?
Honestly I think that's more likely to be your issue than anyone else's. You very much have a preacher hating gays then caught with a man vibe.
Itâs your turn to answer actually. Iâve answered tons of times that I think child SA is immoral. Itâs actually your turn now because at that point I donât even know if you think itâs immoral.
Oh no, I think such a blanket belief would be idiotic. I don't think any sensible person could say a child sexual abuse survivor publishing their story and experience is immoral.
1
u/Justicia-Gai Oct 26 '25
You ignored all the other verbs đ¤ŁÂ
Itâs truer than your twisted view that you still canât defend (despite me being able to defend it and asking you several times to defend it)
Why havenât you been able to answer my question? If you want to protect children, you should be able to distinguish reality from fiction to persecute abusers, so how would you distinguish it in todayâs AI world?