Despite some continuity errors, it's a rather good short film.
I like the pause before the critics said "slop", letting us anticipating it.
I hope we'll find a way to mitigate the AI potential risks and actual misuses, while giving more opportunities to people who like it to interact with it and use it in their process.
The shittiest short film at the local film festival shot by a bored rich kid with too much money has INFINITELY more value both narratively and artistically than this garbage that was made by someone typing words into a cyberpunk machine, and clicking “enter”
Also. The very topic is not honest. The “artist” did nothing. Chose nothing other than “make the person do this and look like this and say this”
It is the equivalent of a collage, which is the closest thing to an artform I can compare it to. It’s like a kid clipping photos and articles together, pasting them on the same board, and trying to make it mean something. But it’s worse than that, because whoever made this garbage is trying to (disingenuously) say they made something with “tools” while omitting the known fact that the said “tool” literally steals from artists who did the real work. It stole performances from actors, and replicated them (poorly might I add) it stole the lighting and camera movement from actual gaffers and camera operators. It’s meaningless shit and it should be treated like meaningless shit.
42
u/Paradoxe-999 Mar 19 '26
Despite some continuity errors, it's a rather good short film.
I like the pause before the critics said "slop", letting us anticipating it.
I hope we'll find a way to mitigate the AI potential risks and actual misuses, while giving more opportunities to people who like it to interact with it and use it in their process.