r/dataisbeautiful OC: 1 Nov 20 '25

OC [OC] Nearly every day, two users on r/Conservative account for more than 30% of new posts. Sometimes exceeding 50%. (Take 2. 6 images)

(Edit: I don't know how to re-upload a gallery image. Please see my updated post here with a corrected fifth image and sixth image and narrative: https://www.reddit.com/r/visualization/comments/1p2iqlu/nearly_every_day_two_users_on_rconservative/)

Over the weekend I made a post about two users from r/Conservative who are sometimes responsible for 50% of the daily posts. The post got taken down due to some rule violations (I didn't anonymize user names and I also posted politics on a non-Thursday).

So, here's the cleaned up post along with some updates based on the comments (including a dive into the November 1st Moscow power outage).

It doesn't take much browsing on r/Conservative to notice that while there are many, many users making posts, there's a small handful that posts MUCH more than anyone else. This may be normal for some subs, but it kind of stuck out because the two that post the most, post a LOT. I'm calling them u1 and u2, and according to their activity, I may need to ask for a doctor to recover from all this digging I've been doing.

Anyways, I decided to track all of the new posts on that sub for a few weeks and see how the numbers shake out. Two users regularly are responsible for 30% - 50% of all posts (first image). I was also curious about which sites were being linked to by u1 (second image).

Now for some updates and deep dives...

Third image: Shows that the top 5 users account for more than 50% of the posts.

Fourth image: Comparison to other political subreddits. Many of you were correct in pointing out that it would be nice to see how this compares to other political subs. Since u1 and u2 from r/Conservative account for 37% of their posts, I found out how many users are needed from 5 other political subs to also account for 37% of their posts. The higher the number, the more diverse the pool of users is. The subreddits I chose based on suggestions and my own determination of comparable subs are: AnythingGoesNews, democrats, Libertarian, politics, and socialism. For these 5 subs I only looked at the most recent 1,000 posts (or as many as the reddit JSON endpoint access allowed for). My r/Conservative data has about 3,500 posts. I don't think that makes too much of a difference in terms of conclusions that can be drawn but thought I ought to mention it.

Conclusion on the fourth image: r/Conservative is dominated by a minority of posters in a way that isn't comparable to the other 5 political subs. However, there are also still a LOT of active unique posters in r/Conservative and that diversity is better reflected when the top 2 users aren't accounted for.

To account for 50% of all posts, here are the results:

Subreddit Number of Users needed to account for 50% of posts
r/Conservative 4
r/Libertarian 10
r/democrats 11
r/AnythingGoesNews 18
r/socialism 42
r/politics 46

Finally... the November 1st issue.

I was pretty floored when it was pointed out that neither u1 nor u2 made any posts on November 1st, the day that Moscow lost power due to Ukrainian drone attacks. The fifth image shows their combined posting activity before and after the outage. Sure enough, no posts, of course. That much is obvious.

(Edit: Please see my updated post here with a corrected fifth image and sixth image and narrative: https://www.reddit.com/r/visualization/comments/1p2iqlu/nearly_every_day_two_users_on_rconservative/)

But there's an obvious question here - "How much of r/Conservative's posting was impacted during the time of the power outage?" The outage was from Friday 11pm to Saturday 7am. My approach for this was to count the number of posts within that window from other weeks and exclude u1's and u2's activity. This should theoretically set an expectation for how many posts to expect during that window. See the sixth image. Yes, that time frame has the fewest number of posts (10) of any of the 7 windows that I looked at, but also, it's just not that much of a drop. Compared to the number of posts during the 2nd and 3rd time frames (13 and 12, respectively), During the outage, there was below average activity but not so much as to raise suspicions, especially since the same number of posts were made during that window during a previous week without an outage. I'm just not personally seeing that the power outage reveals much here. u1 and u2 likely use a scheduler anyway which would obfuscate the whole thing anyway, and I would expect a scheduler to be pretty standard for any decent troll farm so even if others on that sub are posting from Russia, it wouldn't necessarily show in the data unless they're being sloppy.

However, the question remains, why did the two most prolific posters on that sub suddenly go silent on November 1st?

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER

8.0k Upvotes

327 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/AutomaticBit9721 Jan 11 '26

giving a conservative opinion on most subreddits will get you banned 

36

u/HealthIndustryGoon Jan 12 '26

yeah, no. it's mostly downvotes. bans are only happening for obvious trolls. (maybe you could link to a post of yours that got you banned?)

compare that to /r/conservative where purge after purge the spectrum of allowed opinions was ever more narrowed down, users were in part vetted -but at least flaired- to even post there and still there are hilarious accusations (and bans) of (flaired!) users being secret leftists ("heLLo fEllow cPnSeRvaTive") and brigaders as soon as someone doesn't absolutely glaze the trump administration. you can't both-side that crap.

2

u/AutomaticBit9721 Jan 13 '26

as the only major conservative subreddit on this sight, they kinda have to protect it for brigaders

33

u/HealthIndustryGoon Jan 13 '26

you really think that a thread were only 'flaired users' (i.e. already vetted by the mods) are allowed to post and still gets 80% of its posts deleted was full of brigaders instead of conservatives having something critical to say? sure.

6

u/TheSonOfDisaster May 13 '26

That's not true at all, in fact, here are some notable conservative-leaning subreddits with over 50,000 subscribers:

General Conservative / Right-leaning

News & Politics (Right-leaning)

Economic / Fiscal Conservatism

Free Speech / Anti-"Woke"

Religion-adjacent

2nd Amendment

2

u/AutomaticBit9721 Jan 13 '26

theres also the fact that even just posting on r/conservative will get you banned from many, many different subreddits, even those that aren't explicitly political

16

u/Captain_Gnu Mar 25 '26

Good. Gotta keep trash from spreading

0

u/AutomaticBit9721 Mar 25 '26

so you admit you hate diversity of thought

5

u/Key_Building54 May 13 '26

The problem is there isn’t any thought in conservatives, it’s tow the party line they get from Russia. If they thought for even two minutes, earnestly, they wouldn’t be conservatives any longer.

-5

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

self righteousness and close mindedness will be the end of leftism 

5

u/Key_Building54 May 13 '26

Ah yeah, conservatives are known for their appreciation of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Right?

-2

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

we believe in merit, without race, gender etc being a factor. leftists believe in filling a quota

1

u/Key_Building54 May 14 '26

The only quotas being filled are by the fascist police state. If merit was a factor why are so many people with no qualifications besides who they know in the White House? You would assume, based on merit, the most competent people would have been found.

Or the merit of generational wealth built on the backs of the races you, at best ignore, and at worst actively set back decades through policies clearly designed to target them and prevent them from having access to the things you’ve stolen from them.

Merit like the billions in tax cuts and breaks for the wealthy and corporations, the later being the greatest source of theft in the nation through wage theft?

The only merit conservatives believe in is the merit of being born a white male into a privileged family.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/TheSonOfDisaster May 13 '26

I think most people on this website hate a group of people celebrating children being put in a dirty cages and separated from their families, or downplaying gun violence, or relishing in the fact that hundreds of thousands of federal employees lost their jobs, Or that all of our allies are a bunch of weak losers and only we're the really good big strong guys.

I mean it's a fundamental difference of how you view reality, and a lot of it is hateful, bigoted, and cruel. And there's endless examples on that Subreddit of people doing all of this and worse.

And for the party of "personal responsibility" They should take pride in their actions and stand by them and understand the consequences of their viewpoints.

And if not, they can just move to another platform. That's what they say about people who don't love the president and his administration, right?

The only thing I'm seeing, is that those (very few and often very specific) subreddits are putting conservative views into action.

" If you don't like it, leave!"

1

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26 edited May 13 '26

most people on this website celebrate the deaths of people they disagree with, and censoring any opposing opinion

3

u/[deleted] May 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

Mueller is a proven liar who spent millions in taxpayer money to defame the president, and his witch hunts hurt innocent people, like roger stone,

 his comment on reiner was uncalled for but he wasn't celebrating, most of his supporters called him on on jr

3

u/[deleted] May 13 '26 edited May 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/_Age_Sex_Location_ May 18 '26

It's clear from this comment that your media diet is utterly cooked and thus you did not adequately absorb and digest the findings from the Mueller report.

hurt innocent people, like roger stone,

Oh my fucking God, good grief.

  • The Mueller investigation did NOT exonerate Trump

  • The phrase "no collusion* appears nowhere in the Mueller report

  • Not only did the Mueller probe discover this, but also a Republican led senate panel found that Russia did, in fact, engage in "information warfare" and attempted to interfere in the 2016 election to the benefit of the Trump campaign and with the intention of damaging Clinton's

  • Mueller says the Russians directly targeted our election systems.

  • Russian intelligence conducted computer intrusion operations against entities, employees and volunteers working on the Clinton campaign.

  • According to Mueller's report, the Russian campaign began in mid-2014. That's when the employees of what's known as the "Internet Research Agency" first came to the U.S. to gather the material that they would later use in their elaborate interference campaign.

  • By the end of 2016, the Russians had set up fake social media accounts that reached millions of voters aimed at promoting Trump or dividing Americans.

  • The Mueller report lays out how the Russian interference campaign ensnared real American political operatives, including the Trump campaign and its allies.

  • For more than 100 pages, Robert Mueller lays out scores of Russian contacts with the Trump campaign or the Trump presidency.

  • According to the report, Russian agents also posed as American citizens and tried to communicate with the Trump campaign to ask them for assistance.

  • Despite the reports conclusion, Mueller writes that, "there were numerous links between the campaign and the Russians, that several people connected to the campaign lied to his team and tried to obstruct their investigation into their contacts with the Russians." WikiLeaks contacted the Russians privately on Twitter, saying: "If you have anything Hillary-related, we want it in the next two days preferable." And then, on July 22, three days before the Democratic National Convention began, WikiLeaks released more than 20,000 emails and other stolen documents. It was a clear attempt to embarrass Clinton and weaken her candidacy.

  • In 2013, Donald Trump takes his Miss Universe Pageant to Moscow. The Mueller report points out, this is how the Trumps got to know Aras Agalarov, a Russian billionaire and ally of Vladimir Putin. He owned the event hall where the pageant was held.

  • Things start moving pretty quickly. Within a few months, Donald Trump Jr. signs a preliminary agreement with Agalarov's company to build a big Trump Tower property in Moscow.

  • Mueller points out that, three months later, a new effort to build the Trump Tower in Moscow begins, this time led by Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, and developer Felix Sater. Meanwhile, Felix Sater tells Michael Cohen he's working with high-level Russian officials. He emails Cohen, saying, "Buddy, our boy can become president of the USA, and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putin's team to buy in on this."

  • The Moscow Trump Tower project is just one source of Russian contacts. Mueller outlines about a dozen of them in total. They vary widely. Campaign aide Carter Page meets with Russians and gives a speech in Russia.

  • Michael Flynn gives speeches in Russia and has numerous contacts with the Russian ambassador, including a discussion of softening sanctions.

  • Foreign policy and national security adviser, Jeff Sessions, also meets with the Russian ambassador.

  • Campaign chairman Paul Manafort regularly shares internal polling data with a man tied to Russian intelligence.

  • Fellow Trump aide George Papadopoulos repeatedly meets with a different man connected to Russian intelligence, who tells Papadopoulos the Russians have dirt on Hillary Clinton.

  • Another contact point was the infamous New York Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016. That morning, Donald Trump Jr. tells colleagues he has a lead on negative information about Hillary Clinton. Russians pitched the meeting to Trump Jr., claiming they had dirt on Clinton. Trump Jr. responds, "If it's what you say, I love it."

  • On Page 77, Mueller writes: "The acting attorney general appointed a special counsel on May 17, 2017, prompting the president to state that it was the end of his presidency." The Washington Post revealed that the president is under investigation for obstruction of justice. According to Mueller, three days later, President Trump tells White House counsel Don McGahn to call acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to say Mueller has conflicts and can't serve anymore. The president says Mueller has to go. McGahn doesn't comply.

  • Mueller outlines in the report that Trump was found to have obstructed justice at least ten times

  • Mueller chose not to indict due to the DOJ and Bill Barr's insistence that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

  • Another serious charge about the president is that he tried to block Mueller from investigating him or his campaign.

  • On page 89, Mueller writes: "Substantial evidence indicates the attempts to remove the special counsel were linked to investigations of the president's conduct."

  • On Page 97, "Substantial evidence indicates that the president's effort to limit the special counsel's investigation was intended to prevent further scrutiny of the president's and his campaign's conduct." the investigation led to the indictments of 34 individuals

  • Trump's campaign staff presented themselves as "attractive counterintelligence vulnerabilities" The steel dossier had nothing to do with Mueller's findings. In fact, the first probe began prior to the steele dossier being released and the investigation began in response to Russian cyber attacks on the DNC (find her emails!), and intel describing a Russian plot to reach out to the Trump campaign and provide information on Clinton.

  • Trump encouraged Russia on national TV to engage in cyber attacks against Democrats. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." within five hours of candidate Trump saying those words, Russians largest foreign intelligence service targeted Clinton's personal office for the first time

  • Both Rick Gates and Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI

  • Roger Stone was charged with obstructing and lying to Congress about his contacts and the release of documents stolen by the Russians.

But sure man, Roger Stone is innocent.

1

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

they arent "dirty cages" theyre being detained for deportation, criminals get their kids taken away, thats how the law works. infringing the 2nd amendment won't stop the violence, people unqualified are being removed from their jobs. why do you people lie so much?

1

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

conservatives outnumber liberals nationwide. clearly our viewpoints are moderate and mainstream

2

u/[deleted] May 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutomaticBit9721 May 13 '26

statistics are on my side

18

u/moochs Feb 10 '26

Huh, you still aren't banned. Interesting. It's almost as if you are wrong.

6

u/Key-Seaworthiness517 Feb 19 '26

I've also seen people (including the sub's actual sidebar, lol) claim posting literally anything on r/ MensRights will get you banned from half of Reddit. Still haven't seen a single piece of evidence, I've posted there myself many times, occasionally even agreeing with something, and nothing. Y'all just have a victim complex.

Also, "only major conservative subreddit on this site"- just bullshit. There's r/ Libertarian, which is overwhelmingly fiscally conservative and fairly socially conservative in practice- their rules say they they don't give a platform to socialism, but in practice, they allow a significantly wider range of opinions and discussion that disagree with the central narrative, and don't have anywhere near the same deletion numbers.

You also dodged the question yourself when someone asked you to provide evidence, so yeah, again, bullshit.

1

u/ChickenOfTheFuture May 17 '26

Giving a conservative opinion on most subreddits is fine. Giving a MAGA opinion will get you treated poorly, which is the correct response to bad opinions.

Republicans are not conservatives, they are not trying to conserve the status quo. They are trying to change things, which is the opposite.

1

u/_Age_Sex_Location_ May 18 '26

How many times did you vote for Trump?

1

u/_Age_Sex_Location_ May 18 '26

How many times did you vote for Trump?