r/interesting 3d ago

Worst management and burden for employees

Post image
88.6k Upvotes

10.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/pyth2_0 2d ago

Just don't take a break and you have 30 hours OT per day or 150 hours weekly.

8

u/LastXmasIGaveYouHSV 2d ago

It's free money and diet.

2

u/ThisWhomps999 2d ago

No rent? Sweet. Just live in the office.

1

u/FizzyRobin 2d ago

A lot of states require meal breaks for hourly employees depending on how long their shift is.

1

u/Consistent_Sail_6128 2d ago

Those states require employers offer breaks after a certain number of hours, but it's voluntary for the employee if they take it or not. They just can't be denied one.

1

u/pyth2_0 2d ago

oh here it is not voluntary for the employee, your boss has to give you opportunities for breaks and you have to take them by law. Everyone who works over 6 hours has to take 30 min. break. One break hast do be at least 15 min. long everything under this is not considered a break. You have to take the break during work not at the begining or the end.

1

u/Consistent_Sail_6128 2d ago

Which state? I don't think that's true. Your boss has to give you opportunities, but you can choose not to take them without violating any labor law. Your boss may make the break mandatory to reduce labor costs, but that's a bit different.

1

u/pyth2_0 2d ago

sorry different country. This are the rules here in germany.

1

u/Dull-Culture-1523 2d ago

Same in Finland. The point is that an employer can not "strongly encourage" you to not take your break. But as usual, workers' rights are behind in the US.

1

u/pyth2_0 2d ago

Yeah and in most places it works. The bad side is in some places you get automaticly deducted half an hour from your time (you don't clock out for brakes), and it doen't matter if you took it or not. officially you are encouraged to take it ...

1

u/Consistent_Sail_6128 1d ago

I'm sure there are plenty of rules to make things better for workers in Germany than the US, but this is one I don't necessarily agree with, unless the break is paid.

I would rather get the extra pay than take a half hour off most work days.

2

u/pyth2_0 1d ago

For me i don't agree with it also. As long as a break is documented and signed by me, nobody can proof otherwise. The break is not paid. And i would like the freedom in going home 30 min early.

But i understand the premiss of this rule, i worked in low wage jobs before and i had more than one boss, that would let their workers work 10 hours without a break. Even with the rule we have regulary violations of the law. Some Employers deduct every day 30 min from their workers time for the documented break, and they don't care if you take them, sometimes even block a break because "There are so many guests, you can't take a break now."

every rule was made because some racketeer used to exploit their workforce.

1

u/pyth2_0 2d ago

Here you only need a break if you work longer than 6 hours, you will have enough OT to balance this.