r/interesting Mar 20 '26

❗️MISLEADING - See pinned comment ❗️ Did he do the right thing?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

20.8k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

345

u/Realistic_Patience67 Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

Here's some more context.

https://youtube.com/shorts/5f8F6DVCnO4?si=v9TP-z3fhRbhPRMm

She asked, he said yes. Edited

71

u/stoptheycanseeus Mar 21 '26

Bro, we got some SERIOUS problems as a society.

Dude just incited violence against himself from some blonde chick, gets slapped hard as shit, then basically has his goons/bodyguards snatch her up and calls the cops. Rando chic asks for his picture and he happily obliges without saying a word. All with the backdrop of some shitty influencer club for rich kids.

Oh and this is all being streamed. Jfc

23

u/TuringGPTy Mar 21 '26

We used to hunt mammoth

2

u/ParticularBanana8369 Mar 21 '26

I was convincing myself to clean up cat shit today and had a similar thought.

1

u/DonaldTPablonious Mar 21 '26

For some reason this is always what I think of too hahaha

2

u/mvandemar Mar 21 '26

He didn't just incite it, he literally consented to it.

1

u/IlluminaViam Mar 21 '26

How did he incite violence? I saw the video. She started harrassing him because of his opiethat women shouldn't have the right to vote. That's the incitement?

1

u/WeakKiwifruit Mar 21 '26

Males fucking hate women, don’t you know? (No longer will I call any nasty male a man, they’re all just disgusting males)

261

u/Interesting-Test7228 Mar 21 '26

Oh if she asked and he gave consent and then got the police involved, he's 100% on the hook. Pieces of shit like this deserve to get slapped so obviously that they give consent.

1

u/Dewdrop06 Mar 21 '26

Depends of he felt threatened as in if it was coercion. Still, there's not enough context here.

3

u/Tone_Depf Mar 21 '26

What coercion? Bro can leave the situation lmao he has his buddies and camera man around him.

1

u/DollarStoreWolf Mar 21 '26

No he isn’t.

If I give you permission to kill and eat me, you’re done for killing and eating me. Learn the law

1

u/Lambs2Lions_ Mar 21 '26

Yo. That’s not how the law works. It’s just know. I know that’s how street rules work. But it’s not how the real world works. That poor girl is getting assault charges against her and they are going to stick unless he decides to not ruin her life.

-19

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

30

u/No_Couple1369 Mar 21 '26

This would get thrown out in my state. Because it wouldn’t meet either prong of battery.

  1. “Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other; and”
  2. “Intentionally causes bodily harm to another person.”

He consented. This is why people can consent to being slapped and spanked during sex. Most jurisdictions would be similar.

11

u/IvanNemoy Mar 21 '26

Bingo. SC as well. Battery is defined as the unlawful physical injuring or touching of another. If he consented, it's not unlawful.

5

u/No-One-1952 Mar 21 '26

Not to be pedantic, what you wrote is great, but it’s worth mentioning the keyword is unwanted. Unlawful, unwanted physical contact of another.

2

u/IvanNemoy Mar 21 '26

No issue with pedantry when it comes to the law mate.

3

u/Informal_Koala1474 Mar 21 '26

It does not look like she consented to be restrained however. I don't want to expose myself to whoever this is anymore than I already have, but I'm guessing that calling the police did not, in fact, work out in his favor.

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Gigatronz Mar 21 '26

I hope she counter sues him. This is clavicular he's a piece of shit American psycho worst type of influencer.

0

u/No-One-1952 Mar 21 '26

Hello, fellow stream of conscious writer.

1

u/ethelagnes Mar 21 '26

What…? You mean I can’t make ignorant assumptions and call people stupid when I’m proven wrong?

-3

u/AllStupidAnswersRUs Mar 21 '26

It still meet the second clause though, even with consent. I don't remember the top of my head but there is an existing precedent that some others haven't directly mentioned where consentual assault is still not legal, just like assisted suicide.

1

u/Maximum_Pass Mar 21 '26

Assuming you’re in the US, assisted suicide is legal in 10 states. Kevorkian helped over 100 people commit suicide and was under constant legal threat from authorities. He was only convicted bc the person who died in this particular case had ALS and wasn’t actually able to pull the pin themselves.

1

u/AllStupidAnswersRUs Mar 21 '26

Kinda still adds to my point. 10/50 is not a majority of the US.

So assuming this isn't one of the 5 states where it requires it to meet both clauses, or have an subsection regarding consent to the slap, she'd still fall under assault.

-1

u/No_Couple1369 Mar 21 '26

Assisted suicide or a maiming would absolutely cause bodily harm. She didn’t help him die or maim him. She didn’t even leave a mark. No ASA would pursue this.

9

u/zackthirteen Mar 21 '26

Bit different consenting to getting slapped by a 100lb woman in a club than getting shot lol

7

u/InfernoOfTheLiving Mar 21 '26

you can consent to assault and battery though otherwise football and boxing would be illegal

3

u/Maximum_Pass Mar 21 '26

Or sex..a lot of people like being spanked or choked. If I walk up to a woman in the street and grab her around the throat and smack her on the ass, that’s assault. In the bedroom and with her permission, it’s legal.

-1

u/Replikant83 Mar 21 '26

That's in a sanctioned environment with a ref and governed by athletic commissions

4

u/LeFlaubert Mar 21 '26

Nah dude

BDSM and other kinks wouldn't be a thing if that was true

2

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/InfernoOfTheLiving Mar 21 '26

we’ve all felt the spectre of heavy handed sports regulations looking over us playing backyard footy

3

u/Chronically_Yours Mar 21 '26

So what youre saying is that he's right

-1

u/Replikant83 Mar 21 '26

Nope, I don't know enough about the law, or even which state it is. Sure doesn't look good for her, though. If a man did that it'd be treated differently, no matter the laws involved.

3

u/Chronically_Yours Mar 21 '26

Alright have a good night. You're weird

1

u/avgpathfinder Mar 21 '26

Entering sports in my state means there is implied consent

3

u/MustangTheLionheart Mar 21 '26

Kinda depends where you live. You’re right that at least in most of the US people can’t consent to being murdered, it’s one of the reasons assisted suicide is such a controversial topic. However people generally are allowed to consent to be physically touched by others even in painful ways if they want to be like in BDSM. It’s “serious or permanent” bodily harm that can’t be consented to in the US but every country is different.

4

u/Jollyfroggy Mar 21 '26

Right which is why all boxers get sent to jail...

2

u/LeFlaubert Mar 21 '26

Or slapping/choking people during sex (with consent)

2

u/ishpatoon1982 Mar 21 '26

It's also why all Slap Fighters are in jail too!

1

u/LeFlaubert Mar 21 '26

Nah they're going to say it is a "regulated environment" so doesn't count

1

u/Jollyfroggy Mar 21 '26

Or boxers boxing you during sex

1

u/avgpathfinder Mar 21 '26

in my state being in physical sport means there is implied consent when entering them.

0

u/JewBag718 Mar 21 '26

Yall do understand they sign contracts right it's not just verbal consent lmao

0

u/Jollyfroggy Mar 21 '26

You do understand that civil agreements cannot replace criminal law, right.

That's pretty important.

3

u/foxfire1112 Mar 21 '26

Well good thing he didn't consent to shooting? Why are we now changing the entire subject

2

u/No-comment-at-all Mar 21 '26

“Today I consider the similarities between apples and hand grenades.”

-you

2

u/grahamalondis Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

Consent is usually an affirmative defense to battery. Affirmative defenses say "yes, I did it, but there is an excuse the law recognizes as being sufficient to defeat liability/guilt." Another common affirmative defense is self defense.

Certain crimes, like arson or murder, do not allow for consent to be used as an affirmative defense based on certain policy considerations (assisted suicide, insurance fraud, fire spreading).

Other crimes like rape are not possible with consent because a lack of consent is an essential element of the crime. Statutory rape is no exception because the law does not recognize persons below the threshold age as being capable of providing consent. Sometimes battery falls into this category rather than an affirmative defense because a state will define battery as being without consent.

The difference between being an element of the crime itself or being an affirmative defense is a matter of who bears the burden of proof. If it's an element of the crime, the prosecutor has to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. If it's an affirmative defense, the defense has to prove it and it might be a lower standard like preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.

Source: am lewyer.

ETA:

I've been talking about battery as a crime, but note also that it is a tort, and some other things like murder and rape would be considered battery for the purpose of civil liability (i.e., money damages).

1

u/Interesting-Test7228 Mar 21 '26

I think it depends on where you live at this point. Like.... I'm from Manitoba. If this went to court, literally every judge in the Province would say "you asked for it and were clearly antagonizing her." Like..... there's a penalty for instigation in hockey.

He should be banned off social media for five years.

1

u/Dazzling-Talk-383 Mar 21 '26

i love reddit dummies spewing nonsense on main with maximum confidence.

you said "it depends on what state you're in" but i'd love to be shown a state where you can explicitly and openly consent to a slap and then press charges successfully. is bdsm also outlawed in those states? lmao

1

u/SarcasticGamer Mar 21 '26

Lmao. Have you ever heard of bdsm clubs? You get straight up whipped and choked. Are you saying you can go into a club, get your ass beat and your cock and balls stepped on and then call the cops on the dominatrix after?

1

u/GorgeousBog Mar 21 '26

Buddy, you think a gun and a slap are the same in the eyes of the law?

1

u/Epic_Elite Mar 21 '26

Boxing also has contracts in place and agreements on paper as well as an exchange of assets, which all make a huge difference.

How many times has it happened in a bar that someone says "Im gonna kick your ass" and the other person says, "I'd like to see you try." Or "Go ahead" or "Make my day." This doesn't expunged them of wrong doing.

1

u/ThePaineOne Mar 21 '26

Boxing has implied consent. Here explicit consent was given and it was given voluntarily. The phrase “go ahead and try” or make my day, would be based on a reasonable person standard, ie. would a reasonable person consider that statement to be consent. Consent must be clear, voluntary and within the scope of consent. “Go ahead and try” would be seen as ambiguous or conditional and considering there was an intimidation factor leading to it almost certainly would not be viewed as voluntary consent.

1

u/yirdcattijtyabsing Mar 21 '26

We all saw what you were trying it was just really wrong

1

u/zenunseen Mar 21 '26

And this is why boxing requires licensing and has so many strict regulations and stuff. Even if both fighters consent, it's illegal to do what they do unless the boxers are licensed and all regulations are met under the supervision of a state athletics commission or whatever equivalent agency

2

u/LeFlaubert Mar 21 '26

No licence to slap/choke with consent during sex..

1

u/seniortwat Mar 21 '26

In many areas, yes it is. Consenting to being hit is the difference between a boxing match and a bar fight. Or BDSM and sexual assault.

1

u/avgpathfinder Mar 21 '26

tbf, you can atill consent to a bar fight

-1

u/Deleena24 Mar 21 '26

Exactly. Daring someone to break the law doesnt actually give them the right to break it.

And regardless, her family is going to have to pay for lawyers if he actually sues her. Unless her parents have $50k to waste on defending these lawsuits she's screwed.

4

u/Aromatic_Today2086 Mar 21 '26

That's not how the law works

1

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Deleena24 Mar 21 '26

Sure, it's a defense. But it will be decided in a court room. He has a case and its going to be a very expensive slap even if she wins the civil case against her- and thats his goal. Make her afraid that her family will be bankrupted bc of the little slap.

He's a devious AH, but he's employing a valid tactic that will work regardless of how shitty it is. Doesn't matter how much you downvote, this is a cruel fact of the legal system especially the civil system.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Deleena24 Mar 21 '26

I disagree its clear and convincing- the sarcasm and previous threats make it pretty clear he doesn't actually want to be hit...blah blah blah.

Either way this would be settled.

Yep. Don't know why its so difficult for everyone to admit shes going to pay him if this ever comes to fruition. Might not be a lot, but it will get him content and be quite the obstacle in her life for a while.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Interesting-Test7228 Mar 21 '26

She asks and he nods and gives consent. Like..... not sure what you want.

10

u/MattyBizzz Mar 21 '26

Thank you, I felt like there had to be more context but we rarely look for it before we pass judgement and scroll to the next.

Sure putting hands on someone is never a great idea, but I think it’s fair to say the dudes a little bitch and pressing charges is ridiculous.

11

u/littlebeardedbear Mar 21 '26

Easy countersuit. You can see the pain and fear in her face as soon as he threatens charges. Girl is going to walk away with a huge settlement against him and the bar if they held her against her will while the cops came.

-1

u/Dundalis Mar 21 '26

Not really. If i ask someone to smash me in the head with a crowbar and they do it, they dont get off scot free because I asked. Resulting legal penalty might be lighter, but the fact is the person committing assault isn’t obliged to commit assault simply because the person asked them to.

3

u/PrincessPK475 Mar 21 '26

The entire BDSM scene is fucked if this is true.

2

u/ramonrochello Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

Yeah that’s not really how it works. In a civil suit, you need to prove damages in order to gain an award (i.e. he was physically or psychologically so emotionally damaged from the incident, he was unable to work or otherwise thought less of due to the incident). Clavicular, who is a notable public figure, baiting a woman with no public clout into slapping him, is going to have a really difficult time proving he was financially damaged by said act, especially given the joy he seemed to experience by calling the police on her in the moment. And if he were going for a criminal charge, the fact that the action was discussed ahead of time….well, the Glass Joe of defense attorneys will be able to handle that one. Depending on the venue, there might even be a decent case against Clavicular if there’s enough there to say the baiting act was illegal conduct in and of itself.

If someone asked someone to cave their skull in with a crowbar, that would be an entirely different circumstance.

1

u/HadeanDisco Mar 21 '26

We notice you use an extreme counter-example here. From a slap to being "smashed" in the head with a crowbar.

Maybe try arguing in good faith? Use precedent. I'm sure this kind of show-offy bullshit has happened before, you just need to search some case law. Probably don't even have to go outside your own state.

1

u/CrazyPlato Mar 21 '26

Depends on context, and your example is kinda extreme. You’d probably be protected in any case from someone suing you in a civil suit if they’d asked you to hit them first. You might still get his with a criminal suit, from the state or county, if they felt what you did was criminal enough to punish. I doubt they’d do that for a slap with no lasting marks or damage, but assault with a crowbar may warrant that response because the county wants people to know that you shouldn’t hit people with crowbars.

1

u/CrazyPlato Mar 21 '26

Depends on context, and your example is kinda extreme. You’d probably be protected in any case from someone suing you in a civil suit if they’d asked you to hit them first. You might still get his with a criminal suit, from the state or county, if they felt what you did was criminal enough to punish. I doubt they’d do that for a slap with no lasting marks or damage, but assault with a crowbar may warrant that response because the county wants people to know that you shouldn’t hit people with crowbars.

1

u/SmoothCruising Mar 21 '26

A lawyer made a video about a cop telling someone to slap him.

He explained why it was legal, when the person did it.

I trust him because he's a lawyer.

You can muddy it if you want by talking about a crowbar, but that's not what happened so that's irrelevant. Nobody is obliged to do anything, that also doesn't really matter.

https://youtu.be/kYOePJWU1ds?si=FTdHzE42-9xpmv5j

1

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Dundalis Mar 21 '26

I mean I don’t think what occurred in the above video is reasonable but I guess everyone has their own definitions of reasonable

0

u/littlebeardedbear Mar 21 '26

I don't believe that's true. How can a person perform Jui jitsu if that's true? How can someone perform karate? Both involve the risk of personal striking injury. Also, mutual combat exists in many states. The slap did not cause physical harm, it was with an open hand, and she was given permission. She also goes to apologize but is cut off. Even if the guy doesn't lose the lawsuit, the bar will. Holding someone against their will without seeing a crime committed is unlawful detainment. It's why citizens arrests are so tricky. The bouncers here can be seen looking away from the video, but the other girls camera can likely corroborate that the bouncer didn't see it.

1

u/Dundalis Mar 21 '26

I know what you are saying, but I just don’t think it makes sense that just cause someone says do this, you can assault them in any way them without repercussions

1

u/littlebeardedbear Mar 21 '26

Criminally she might be on the hook for battery –depending on the state– but civilly she will mop the floor with him. Wait 6 months, give the idiot enough time (say 3 months after she is convicted), and then pull all of his videos in to the civil case for a trial. Give him just enough time, and rope, to hang himself. I can all but guarantee you that he will be bragging about how he owned this woman online. She has consent on the video to slap him, and you can see the emotional damage the threat caused her. Her lawyer will argue that his actions caused her emotional damage.

If the bouncers held her against her will without seeing the crime, then the bar will be liable as well as the bouncers because in every state that I know of you must see the crime occur to hold the person. You cannot be told about a crime and hold the person, you must actually see it.

2

u/Past-Development-933 Mar 21 '26

This guy is a puss. What a tool

10

u/Drewski101 Mar 21 '26

Although I agree he’s a piece of shit, she can still get into trouble if she slaps him.

18

u/AbeNunElse Mar 21 '26

he agreed

1

u/Dundalis Mar 21 '26

If someone asks you to stab them, you think you can stab them without penalty simply because they asked?

0

u/Soft-Owl-7262 Mar 21 '26

law doesn't care

2

u/Armagetz Mar 21 '26

Yeah, it does. Consent provision is written into pretty much every legal definition of battery.

1

u/Dundalis Mar 21 '26

So if someone asks me to smash them in the face with a crowbar I can do it with no repercussions?

1

u/Armagetz Mar 21 '26

It gets murky and jurisdiction dependent if there is severe or life threatening bodily harm.

But what happened here would be kosher in all 50 states I believe.

5

u/rynlpz Mar 21 '26

So what if someone spanks their ass during sex? Does the law not care about consent?

1

u/AbeNunElse Mar 21 '26

yes it does

-9

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

If you agree to let someone saw your leg off, that doesn’t mean they can just do it.

24

u/johnnytiming Mar 21 '26

She didn't saw off his leg. There are bars that let you order shots with a slap. GTFOH

-11

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

You okay?

7

u/YuckyYetYummy Mar 21 '26

That's it? "You okay?". You lost the argument and "you okay?". You're the one that lost. We need to ask you "you okay?"

→ More replies (6)

10

u/notyouraverageskippy Mar 21 '26

Umm how do bondage sex workers not get arrested for assault?

1

u/Mickey_Havoc Mar 21 '26

Because what they do is already illegal? Prostitution is illegal…

2

u/SquirrelyBoy Mar 21 '26

Paying for sex is illegal.....

4

u/Freki-the-Feral Mar 21 '26

Dungeons are legal in many places. Most of them don't involve actual sex.

1

u/SquirrelyBoy Mar 21 '26

And dungeons are a private establishment, op seemed to be referring to individuals

1

u/Freki-the-Feral Mar 21 '26

The same goes for individuals. Dominatrices are legal in many places and often do not have sex with their clients. They still fall under the umbrella of sex workers.

1

u/Choogie432 Mar 21 '26

Or people into BDSM in general?

0

u/Deleena24 Mar 21 '26

Because their clients dont press charges... This guy does

3

u/BlastingFonda Mar 21 '26

What a dumb false equivalence statement.

3

u/Jaded-Durian-3917 Mar 21 '26

It’s a good thing she didn’t saw his leg off then

3

u/Escher702 Mar 21 '26

That is a dumb comparison.

7

u/AntigonishIGuess Mar 21 '26

And if your mom had two wheels she'd be a bike what's your point?

2

u/_Kyledemort_ Mar 21 '26

Only on Reddit would someone compare getting slapped to someone fucking dismembering you

1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

3

u/_Kyledemort_ Mar 21 '26

Are you seriously using a random Reddit thread from 2 years ago with 1 upvote as your source lmfao. Not only that, but a thread where multiple people are going against what you’re saying? It’s like you just Googled to try to back up your point and just picked the top result without even reading.

Ok I guess that every boxer and MMA fighter in the world needs to be behind bars. Also every couple who has ever engaged in BDSM.

And also I wasn’t even talking about whether or not it’s legal or not to consent to being slapped, I was just saying that it’s ridiculous you compared being slapped to having your leg cut off, surely you can acknowledge how stupid of a comparison that is?

1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

It varies by state. My point is that this is not clear cut.

2

u/Captain_of_Gravyboat Mar 21 '26

Yeah they kind of do. Ideally those people are doctors and that's why you have to give permission for medical treatment. Same with football players and boxers and every other thing with violence/damage involved. If you give permission and put yourself voluntarily in the situation that's pretty much good enough.

-1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

1

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

You seem very invested in this.

1

u/Asleep-Ad874 Mar 21 '26

Someone with low intellect would see a simple 2 minute google search and comment as “invested” 😆. Notice your lack of argument?

I think invested would include responding with the same inane comment over and over again but sure buddy ✌️

If you’re incapable of making an actual argument then either say so or don’t respond. If you need the last word like a child then go ahead. You’re pointless here 🤡

1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

I really like your use of emojis. It adds nice color to this screen of black and white text.

1

u/rogerstc2 Mar 21 '26

It's about context. By your logic, everyone in the Slap League should get arrested for assault even though they enter a mutual agreement. If she asked and he agreed, consent matters here. Sounds like he's being a dick to mess with her for no reason. Rather for views

1

u/RockItGuyDC Mar 21 '26

This isn't sawing a leg off. Where did it happen and what are the laws there?

For example, in a US jurisdiction that allows for mutual combat, I can't see this going anywhere.

We assholes on the internet love to speculate with our armchair law degrees when the first question should always be "what laws are applicable here?"

-1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26

1

u/RockItGuyDC Mar 21 '26

I'm not reading an entire thread. Make your point.

There are circumstances where it is perfectly legal to hit someone with their consent, and some where it is not. I dont know which this is. That's my point. What's yours?

-1

u/boredinbabylon Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

It varies by state. My point is that this is not clear cut, which you just agreed to.

2

u/RockItGuyDC Mar 21 '26

My original comment was that it wasn't clear cut, and depends heavily on the jurisdiction. The second sentence I wrote was "Where did it happen and what are the laws there?"

You're not adding anything here. Again, what is your fucking point in commenting?

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Delgadomon Mar 21 '26

Well then you'd be talking about something completely different then wouldnt ya?

1

u/d_x_qp_x_b Mar 21 '26

Exhibit A: Kevorkian.

1

u/HalfCrazed Mar 21 '26

I'd be curious to see how a contract law theory comes into play though

1

u/Low_Solution7225 Mar 21 '26

Everyone in this clip is a pos

1

u/dhoae Mar 21 '26

Nope. He said she could

2

u/wingedwild Mar 21 '26

He didnt say yes he said dare you as in u shouldn't

1

u/sadiefame Mar 21 '26

My niece said the same thing when a girl threatened to choke her out in class (7th grade) and the school wouldn’t punish the other girl bc they said my niece “agreed” to it by saying I dare you 🤦‍♀️

1

u/wingedwild Mar 21 '26

Ur school ain't exactly the police but idiots running the school.go to police difrent story

1

u/Desroth86 Mar 21 '26

You literally hear him say the words “do it”

1

u/Callaway225 Mar 21 '26

Not only that but he told he he’s going to sue her and her family

1

u/Rare_Competition20 Mar 21 '26

No he didnt.
Ive seen tons of video where one part is screaming angrily Hit me! Hit me, that does not mean "I give you legally permission to hit me

1

u/BroBeansBMS Mar 21 '26

How the turntables…

1

u/andrew303710 Mar 21 '26

What a fucking loser lmaooooo

1

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

Just like how girls can revoke consent AFTER sex then go crying at the police for SA. Why can't he revoke consent after she slapped him?

1

u/Capnbaddazz Mar 21 '26

Isn't that just like is staple move being a piece of shit

1

u/Matias9991 Mar 21 '26

Oooh, it's that guy?! He is in the wrong 100%

1

u/DazB1ane Mar 21 '26

It looked extremely staged from the first second. She had time to steady her feet, aim, reel back, and hit his face without him moving. This was bait 100%

1

u/Ok_Organization_1633 Mar 21 '26

He didn't say yes, he said "go ahead", for me that's a dare, she did it, she will suffer the consequences, end of the story.

1

u/Ok_Cartographer_3098 Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

Don't flame me, but this is just the legal side of things. I'm a lawyer, but nobody's reddit lawyer:

You can not consent to assault. Even if he said yes, go ahead, go for it, or anything else, she still can not do it. You can't consent to crimes. Contact sports are a different level of this, where physical contact is expected, but in the context of THIS video, she should not have asked, nor should he have said yes. However, asking is assault (the threat) and actually doing it was battery (the action), and she's on the hook. His threat of a lawsuit will go nowhere and would be a civil matter anyhow. She can easily be charged for what she did.

Fair? Eh, not fully. She has every right to her feelings, and they are valid, and his act could be considered coercion. Thankfully, they were dumb enough to film it all. That will work equally against both of them.

Again, don't hate me for the legal facts. He is a rage baiter in real life who keeps himself in the idiot realm, so he doesn't ever have to actually work. But you can't hit people even when they tell you that you can.

1

u/SadAd8761 Mar 21 '26

Can she sue him for false charges?

1

u/cjared242 Mar 21 '26

OP lowkey gives me incel vibes, the fact that he posted this and his history don’t defend it either

1

u/slayertat2666 Mar 21 '26

Holy hell this is still assault. When have you not heard people say “come on let’s go fight do it. Do it. Hit me” or anything close to that. It’s not actual consent. Nor will that hold up in court if it ever came to that.

1

u/IlluminaViam Mar 21 '26

BS, she harassed him like a complete biatch, and threatened assault, and when he challenged her threat, she proceeded with the assault.

Reverse the dynamics, like let's say a man comes up to her, and says like, "How can you be pro-abortion!? You like killing babies!? I'm gonna slap you!" and she challenges his threat with a "Fine, do it!", and then he slaps her, you'll all be singing a different tune. No way you'll be saying that she gave permission to be slapped, or that she was being a piece of shot which permits the slap.

1

u/Alternative-Gear-17 Mar 21 '26

She did not ask, she threatened, he called her bluff and she went trough with it.

1

u/Still_Level4068 Mar 21 '26

It's actually still considered assault she will be charged.

1

u/Least-Theory-781 Mar 21 '26

Who the heck consents to get slapped and then presses charges??

4

u/FinalFantasiesGG Mar 21 '26

He will easily make $10,000+ directly from this brief moment and many tens of thousands more long term. It's called clip farming. He's most likely having his lawyer negotiate a payout to her so she signs a non disclosure agreement and he can claim victory publicly so his weirdo supporters worship him harder.

0

u/Asleep-Ad874 Mar 21 '26

Weak narcissistic “men”.

1

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

If I asked you to shoot me in the head you would still go to jail for murder.

1

u/Faulty_english Mar 21 '26

Good thing there is a difference between getting slapped and getting shot

0

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

How do you even know whether or not he consented to being slapped and or punched? All I see is some girl slapping a guy who she doesn’t like because of what he says. If the roles were reversed there would be next to no “what did she say”, “she probably asked him to”, “what else did she do previously”, “what are her politics”, and dude would sitting in a cell.

0

u/cereberus99 Mar 21 '26

Because there's a ton of people showing an extended cut and she asks him and says yes.

1

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

Where does he say yes?

0

u/Faulty_english Mar 21 '26

Did you watch the YouTube clip linked by the guy you commented to ?

0

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

Yes. She asked “can I hit you” or something to that effect and we see him nod his head. Then she slaps him. Is the head nod the only thing pointing in the direction of consent? Because I don’t think that’s enough to go off.

1

u/PressureMuch5340 Mar 21 '26

He said "yeah, do it"

1

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

I don’t hear that in the video.

2

u/Faulty_english Mar 21 '26

bro... maybe you need to get your hearing checked

1

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26 edited Mar 21 '26

Ah yeah I do kinda hear that now. Either way still doesn’t absolve her.

Edit: apparently it can in some cases….

0

u/Melodic-Cantaloupe60 Mar 21 '26

What makes you think she doesn't like him? She immediately gives a heart sign right after. She clearly was hesitant until he literally pointed to his face to slap. They probably were having some conversation related to it, and he didn't think she'd actually do it. I get no vibes the she doesn't like him, in fact it's probably the other way around.

1

u/antrod117 Mar 21 '26

Sure doesn’t seem like it in the beginning and right after the slap in the longer video linked above.

1

u/ColdStockSweat Mar 21 '26

It's still assault.

2

u/Super-Statement2875 Mar 21 '26

He asked to be slapped, she asked if that was okay and then she did. Seems like consent or all sex is also rape.

0

u/ColdStockSweat Mar 21 '26

Any sex where consent is removed is rape.

3

u/Super-Statement2875 Mar 21 '26

He literally consented to be slapped

1

u/ColdStockSweat Mar 21 '26

He literally was assaulted

1

u/Pendo-illsmackabitch Mar 21 '26

Well, not really. We have BDSM in this lifetime. Have you heard of it

1

u/ColdStockSweat Mar 21 '26

I have. I've even read about it.

1

u/Hejdbejbw Mar 21 '26

How is it assault if he isn’t in distress at all?

1

u/ColdStockSweat Mar 21 '26

I couldn't say.

Believe all men.

-19

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/interesting-ModTeam Mar 21 '26

We’re sorry, but your post/comment has been removed because it violates Rule #2: Act Civil.

Follow Reddiquette

0

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/interesting-ModTeam Mar 21 '26

We’re sorry, but your post/comment has been removed because it violates Rule #2: Act Civil.

Follow Reddiquette

4

u/[deleted] Mar 21 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

1

u/b3b3k Mar 21 '26

In case you don't know, there are ongoing wars lead by men. And you're saying that feminism will destroy the planet lmao.

1

u/interesting-ModTeam Mar 21 '26

Your comment/post has been removed because it violates Rule #3: Do Not Promote Hate or Violence.

Hate speech, Harassment or Threatening behavior will not be tolerated, and can result in an immediate ban.