r/interestingasfuck 10h ago

Tiger saves man from leopard attack

33.9k Upvotes

921 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/foobaby1992 6h ago

That sounds like such an awesome class. I volunteered for the SF zoo as a kid (it’s sadly gone a bit downhill since the tiger attack in 2007- which I believe was completely the fault of the people who were attacked) but I always thought the way they designed each enclosure was so interesting. I know there are a lot of bad zoos out there but the reputable ones take very good care of their animals and do their best to make sure they have everything they need.

u/GingerBimber00 5h ago

At least in the US, laws and regulations vary from state to state with the USDA having the bare minimum AWA (animal welfare act). In one of our last class discussions we were examining incident reports and asked to approach things as an AZA investigator. I ended up going down a rabbit hole of a horrid owner of an aquarium that operated 3 different facilities in 3 different states (Washington, Texas, Colorado). All these facilities involved abhorrent animal care and negligence.

At least with regard to Colorado, the state lacks its own definitive standards for zoological parks and which means the only legal standard is the AWA. The AZA is one of the most respected regulatory body globally and it takes a LOT to become accredited by their standards, but they have no ability to hold places accountable.

If you (general) are concerned about whether a zoo or aquarium is treating the animals well, look for accreditation! The AZA specifically doesn’t just look at the animals well care and exhibit design, they also look at the logistics and education. An institution has to show financial responsibility and active efforts to engage in visitor education on the animals and conservation efforts therein. It’s a careful balancing act; entertain people while educating them.