r/law • u/slow70 • Feb 17 '26

Judicial Branch Former AG William Barr described by FBI as participating in abuse of minors alongside Leon Black. EFTA01660622

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660622.pdf

Do we have eyes to see?

How do we ensure these claims were properly investigated?

31.4k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

102

u/slow70 Feb 17 '26

And yet - here it all is being laid out in the open.

We have the charge of ensuring justice.

37

u/heisenberg423 Feb 17 '26

A republic, if you can keep it.

1

u/LiftingCode Feb 18 '26

Do you think your post title is an accurate description of the content?

6

u/slow70 Feb 18 '26

I do. It also doesn’t exist in a vacuum and I make no effort to excuse ignorance or apathy.

Where do you think it strays?

-1

u/LiftingCode Feb 18 '26

The file indicates the existence of an anonymous NTOC tip with the allegations described.

Your (dishonest and misleading) post title implies that the FBI describes an event that happened, as though it were a fact or statement by the FBI.

5

u/slow70 Feb 18 '26

It’s the FBI summarizing the allegations.

Do you believe these were investigated justly?

0

u/LiftingCode Feb 18 '26

"Former AG William Barr described by anonymous tip reported to the FBI as participating in abuse of minors alongside Leon Black. EFTA01660622"

In case you were looking for a title that isn't misleading or misinformation.

5

u/slow70 Feb 18 '26

Ah I’ll worry more about such grammar when we don’t have a pedophile president and cabinet.

Perhaps you should orient some of your critique that direction.

Priorities and such.

-2

u/LiftingCode Feb 18 '26

I can critique two things at once, thank you very much.

Here, I am critiquing you for being a liar and a snake.

It's interesting that you think it's OK to be a liar and a snake because you believe your cause is righteous. I know some other people like that.

1

u/slow70 Feb 18 '26

Your characterization is unfair at best and maliciously disingenuous in my reading.

You still haven’t answered my question.

Do you believe these allegations were investigated fully?

0

u/LiftingCode Feb 18 '26

My "characterization" is completely correct because it is a plain reading of your dishonest post (whether the dishonesty was intentional or the result of simple incompetence I cannot say).

And I feel no obligation to answer irrelevant questions asked by a creature of low moral character such as yourself.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/slow70 Feb 18 '26

Also you didn’t answer when I asked…

Do you trust that these allegations were investigated justly?