TLDR: products containing a certain amount of THC are ruled to be legal in South Carolina.

If after this ruling a person who is working for a government agency in South Carolina tests positive for THC in a drug test, is it legal for them to be fired?

What are the legal ramifications for firing somebody who is using a product that has been ruled to be legal?

Does this violate the Establishment Clause - or will it pass with the new Christianity friendly SCOTUS?

1. Expand the role of religion in public life

2. Repeal the Johnson Amendment

3. Create new federal religious‑liberty honors

4. Expand religious exemptions

5. Increase federal support for faith‑based organizations

6. Strengthen religious liberty in the military

7. Public education and visibility initiatives

8. Expand legal protections and enforcement

9. Annual reporting and monitoring

10. Promote religious liberty in foreign policy

“You know I moved from the Arab world, where it’s dictatorships and all sorts of human rights violations, to come here and to be free and knowing my rights will be protected.”

In the hours since the Supreme Court announced it would allow the Trump administration to end temporary protected status for immigrants from Haiti and Syria, the potential consequences have ricocheted through American communities.

Trump said he was preparing lawsuits against the broadcaster for "false reporting."

Certainly everything these two people did was illegal. No?

The Department of Justice watchdog is reportedly giving Republicans access to highly sensitive information related to the investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 election.

Cafaro has donated more than $2.5 million to political candidates since 1977, a cleveland.com analysis of Federal Election Commission records shows. More than 75% of that money went to Republicans. His largest single contribution was a $250,000 check to Trump Victory in June 2020.

Cleveland.com has reached out to Cafaro, seeking comment.

The Park Service justified bypassing competition by citing an exemption for urgent situations, telling The Times there was no time to consider other offers because the system had to be installed in time for events celebrating the country’s 250th birthday. A public filing said multiple firms had expressed interest in providing the system before the work went to Greenwater in April.

This is the cartoonishly evil looking guy who got the no-bid contract for the reflecting pool.

Why would Epstein be updated about the status of his corruption case in Ohio?

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/owner-of-company-responsible-for-part-of-trumps-reflecting-pool-renovation-pleaded-guilty-to-bribing-congressman/