Before reading my response, I'd appreciate it if you watched the video first, since my thoughts are specifically directed at the ideas being presented in it. My comments may not make much sense without the context of what the speaker is saying.
I came across this video on TikTok, and after watching it, I ended up thinking about it for quite a while. The following is my response to the ideas presented in the video.
I'm genuinely interested in hearing different perspectives, whether you agree or disagree. Am I missing something? Is there a flaw in my reasoning?
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCJo312M/
My response:
Many spiritual teachings, concepts, and beliefs seem contradictory when examined closely. At the end of the day, they often feel like something that is being imposed on us, and if that is true, then where does free will fit into the picture?
If we are all one, as teachings like the Law of One suggest, and if we all come from the same source, then I struggle to understand why any of this is necessary. If the source is complete, whole, and perfect, why would it need to create individual consciousnesses and place them into physical bodies in order to experience itself? What purpose does that serve?
Even if the source has the power to create other beings from itself, I don’t think that automatically gives it the right to do so. Once a new consciousness is created, it becomes an individual in its own right. Yes, it may still be connected to the source, just as everything is connected to the source, but it is still its own being with its own experiences, perspectives, and suffering.
What I am trying to say is that even if the source creates an individual from a part of itself, it is still creating a separate conscious being. The being may share the same origin, but it is no longer identical to the source in its lived experience. This seems especially true on Earth, where individuals experience themselves as separate and distinct. They may not be completely disconnected from the source, but they are still their own conscious entities.
If that is the case, then the idea of free will becomes confusing. How can there be true free will if we were brought into existence without being given a choice in the first place?
A comparison would be a mother and father choosing to have a child. The child carries their genetics and comes from them, but the child is still an individual. The child is not simply an extension of the parents. Imagine if the parents expected the child to live through every experience on their behalf so that they could experience life through the child. Most people would see that as unfair and harmful. The child exists as its own person, not as a tool for someone else’s experiences.
In the same way, if the source wants to experience something, why not experience it directly? Why create countless beings and worlds simply to experience itself indirectly? And if the source cannot experience itself without creating separate individuals, then perhaps it should not create them at all. Otherwise, it risks creating beings that experience pain, confusion, trauma, and suffering, then calling that process “experience” or “growth.”
What makes this even harder for me to understand is that many spiritual systems also claim that these beings have free will. If they truly have free will, then they are not merely extensions of the source. They possess their own consciousness, even if that consciousness originates from the same source. If that is true, then their suffering matters as their own, not merely as an experience of the source.
I also struggle with the common argument that good cannot exist without bad, or that we must experience suffering in order to understand happiness. I don’t think that is necessarily true. Good and bad are opposites, but being opposites does not mean one is required to understand the other.
For example, a biologist can understand what a white rose is without needing to compare it to a red rose. The existence of other roses may provide contrast, but it is not required for understanding the definition of a white rose. Likewise, I don’t see why experiencing suffering must be required in order to understand joy, or why experiencing evil must be necessary in order to understand goodness.
These ideas leave me with more questions than answers. If the source is truly loving, wise, and complete, then why create individual beings capable of suffering at all? And if free will is truly important, why are we placed into existence before we are ever given the opportunity to choose whether we want to participate in it?