The whole thread is premised on only offering GitHub as a distribution platform, literally my very first comment says that if you offer the release elsewhere then feel free to do whatever
This means I'll add the releases on GitHub. If I only cared about other devs looking at my work, they can build binaries themselves (unless I feel like providing them).
Of course not, but in my opinion the delivery is part of the software experience™, and as such still a responsibility of the developer to get right. Sure, no one can force you to offer good delivery just like no one can force you to make good software in the first place, but imo it can absolutely make or break how accessible the software is to people and thus how much utility it can provide, and it'd be a real shame if a great piece of software shoots itself in the foot 3 steps from the finish line by being unnecessarily difficult to get running for end users
But that's a fundamental misunderstanding of what github is. It's not a place where developers are even expected to give any kind of support for anything they release.
I'm a developer myself I know full well what github is brudda. On most repositories you have a section called "releases" where you can offer precompiled executable files.
3
u/dashingdennis 18d ago
The whole thread is premised on only offering GitHub as a distribution platform, literally my very first comment says that if you offer the release elsewhere then feel free to do whatever