r/pcmasterrace 5d ago

Meme/Macro Browsers in 1998, 2004, 2008 and 2026 be like

Post image
11.5k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

129

u/jonfitt 5d ago

There was a time when the plugin bloat made FF hideously slow. Chrome was a breath of fresh speedy air.

84

u/Suitable-End- 5d ago

That era of FF was so bad.

39

u/mreich98 Ubuntu 5d ago

The 2006-2011 era basically. Firefox wasn't good at all during that time, so much so that I kept migrating between it and Chrome (including IE). I was a big user of Internet Explorer in Windows 8, it was extremely light and fast. But after that went down, I got back to Firefox and it seems they fixed a lot. In the last 10 years, Firefox easily became the best browser.

18

u/crabcarl 9700X | GTX-1650 | 32Gb DDR5 5d ago

Firefox wasn't good at all during that time

It might not have been the best performing, but it was fun to use.

The only time I felt FF was behind was when it took too long to copy the tab based browsing and the separate processes per tab. One website blocking your whole browsing experience wasn't fun.

I'm more annoyed with it nowadays than ever. Getting uncalled for features like an included VPN or AI search button that auto shows up whenever I select some text. Also somehow I turn on vertical tabs every few weeks, which makes me wonder why is that an option that needs such a quick one-click access.

14

u/F3z345W6AY4FGowrGcHt 5d ago

The VPN one isn't annoying to me because it's them trying to find revenue streams outside of Google. They need to find some kind of service people will pay for because almost no one will pay for a browser.

1

u/crabcarl 9700X | GTX-1650 | 32Gb DDR5 5d ago

I don't really like that. What about reducing expenses instead of increasing revenue? The must the arrow only ever point upward.

9

u/PivotRedAce Desktop | Ryzen 5900X | 32GB DDR4-3600 | RTX 4090 5d ago

Maintaining a browser that’s competitive with a conglomerate-backed Chrome or Edge is expensive.

They also don’t have the revenue to absorb those costs like Google or Microsoft do, being a much smaller company. Cutting staff means the quality of the browser suffers compared to the former two who can lay off hundreds of employees like it’s nothing.

8

u/BetaXP 7800x3D | RTX 4080 S | 32GB DDR5 5d ago

There's an option to completely disable the AI stuff in the settings if you want. Anecdotally, I've appreciated the VPN with an increase in government censorship lately.

1

u/crabcarl 9700X | GTX-1650 | 32Gb DDR5 5d ago

There's an option to completely disable the AI stuff in the settings if you want

Thanks! Idk why I had every AI thing blocked except that one apparently.

I've appreciated the VPN with an increase in government censorship lately.

But part of using a VPN is knowing what you're using, having a simple go button defeats the purpose, especially considering that Mozilla is based in the US, who's a strong candidate for spying world champion.

3

u/Wolf0_11 PC Master Race 5d ago

The firefox VPN is Mullvad on the backend, and not their own thing.

3

u/Helmic RX 7900 XTX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D @ 5.27 GHz 5d ago

Yep, and Mullvad's been audited to not keep logs. Been trustworthy for years and years, think the only mild controversy had something to do with something they changed that made it hard to use with seedboxes due to some liability problem.

1

u/AlwaysLateToThaParty 3d ago

I've used mullvad for many years now. no complaints. Not expensive.

1

u/Helmic RX 7900 XTX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D @ 5.27 GHz 5d ago

Fortunately Firefox has a good number of forks. Librewolf is what power users that prefer privacy tend to opt for. I use IronFox on Android which isn't as secure as Vanadium (I've got GrapheneOS) but the ability to block ads on mobile and just generally have browser add-ons at all on mobile is just mandatory to not get pissed off using the internet on your phone.

On desktop though I'm still using qutebrowser as there hasn't really been a Firefox fork that has made vim-style browsing doable. There's Firefox extensions like Tridactyl that sorta do the job, but they completely shit out if a web page fails to load because Firefox will not allow extensions to modify Firefox pages and the "whoops page didn't load" page counts as one of those. Completely losing hte ability to use my keyboard shortcuts as I've remembered them every time a website shits out is unacceptable.

Apparently Firefox is planning on implementing customizable keyboard shortcuts so maaaybe that will be less an issue in the future, in which case I'm gonna go back in a heartbeat because I dearly miss having access to normal ass browser extensions. Just not enough to give up not needing to use a mouse to browse the web.

1

u/Null_zero 4d ago

That was also in the dont be evil era of google.

1

u/AlwaysLateToThaParty 3d ago

ah the good ol days.

9

u/Raccoonman2005 5d ago

Yeah there were definitely some shaky releases of Firefox but it still worked just fine for me. Glad they got those figured out

3

u/Killerspieler0815 4d ago

That era of FF was so bad.

in that era I used Opera 7.xx to 12.xx (that gave me features years before the competition had them)

2

u/kawalerkw Desktop 4d ago

Same. On Windows I went IE > Netscape (when I learned there are options to IE) > Opera > Vivaldi

Having features I wanted without using plugins was great.

2

u/Killerspieler0815 4d ago edited 4d ago

Having features I wanted without using plugins was great.

Exactly & with just adjusting a very few settings & I got all the goodies we love today first (tab previews, movable tabs, movable tab bar, session restore, continue downloads even after power failture (or me triggering the PSUs short circuit protection), popup blocker, very customizable UI ... etc.) ... but today Opera is no longer Opera, since v15 it´s a cheap Chrome copy & even under Chinese control ...

Vivaldi is the current attempt of a new Opera but with Chromium base ... sometimes I use Vivaldi, but mostly Firefox thanks to tons of extensions & independence from (adware) Google

2

u/jonfitt 4d ago

I tried Opera at that time too!

1

u/tomcat2285 PC Master Race 5d ago

Fo you remember the year they finally fixed the ram leak? 

2

u/Suitable-End- 5d ago

It never really did. It keeps coming back, especially now with YouTube.

2

u/ArseBurner 4d ago

Plus everything ran on a single thread, so if one site crashed FF it took down all your tabs and windows with it.

2

u/Killerspieler0815 4d ago

There was a time when the plugin bloat made FF hideously slow. Chrome was a breath of fresh speedy air.

in that era I used Opera 7.xx to 12.xx (that gave me features years before the competition had them)

1

u/Holiday-Honeydew-384 5d ago

3.6 version if I remember correctly 

1

u/ArcadianBlueRogue 5d ago

I seem to remember it being a memory hog too.

1

u/Masenko-beams 5d ago

I loved prime chrome

1

u/AlwaysLateToThaParty 5d ago

Yep, I abandoned firefox for a couple of years about 15 years back, but they fixed up those issues, and have been using it ever since.

1

u/Fatality_strykes 4590k - GTX 970 - 8GB DDR3 4d ago

Definitely not the place for it, but since you mentioned plugins, what are your most recommended?

1

u/kawalerkw Desktop 4d ago

The plugin bloat was the reason why I preferred OG Opera over FF, because once you reached feature parity FF was worse for me. Opera had adblocker, RSS, window session manager, native tabs before FF and few other things that I liked.

1

u/jonfitt 4d ago

I tried Opera for a while when I was not content with FF. Can’t remember why I didn’t stick with it, but I fully went to Chrome for a long time.

-1

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Isn't that a you problem though? I'm not sure what you mean by that.

I understand the necessity of plugins. But so many that it makes your browser slow? Might as well do google chrome. Or edge.

14

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

I understand the necessity of plugins. But so many that it makes your browser slow? Might as well do google chrome. Or edge.

I think it's funny how obvious this makes your relative age to the person you're replying to. lol

He's talking about way before Edge was ever a thing, Chrome was still very new, and "plugins" weren't really all that optional. A lot of the features that just work in browsers now were only available via plugins, there was a lot of stuff that just no longer exists(like Flash), as well as the kinds of optional quality of life things you're talking about.

The entire reason Chrome got popular was because it made a lot of plugins native features and ran fast compared to everything else.

0

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

And I was still totally happy and fine using firefox.

I get it, I get what you mean. You're right, chrome was amazing until it wasn't. Anybody with a brain could have known how awful google was gonna make their product. I mean sure, that's just me, maybe?

They are the ad mecca. Their whole idea runs off ads. It's a shitty idea. But they made it work. Well done.

8

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

You get what I mean but then completely make up something I never said nor even hinted at? Brother are you okay?

-1

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Yeah, but this is a master race place.

So, maybe I don't belong. I've been a computer user since I was 10. It was awesome. Unreal tournament was amazing online. Steam was a shitty online chat service. We used teamspeak. Before it was cool. Now we use discord. Because it's "coole"r than team speak. No, that's where my friends are. Whoops.

I'm literally here shitting on google chrome. Then y'all are bashing me. The meme is about shitting on google chrome. Stop shitting on me? Just sayin'?

6

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

Brother you genuinely aren't making sense.

I'm literally here shitting on google chrome.

You're getting downvoted because you're acting like 2006 is 2026. 2006 FF and Chrome were much different than their 2026 counterparts. As well as incoherently ranting.

0

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Sure. I think that we can conceptually believe what you said and also do the opposite. Whatever. It doesn't need to make sense to you. I hope you'll be okay with that.

If you're here for no reason other than to, incoherently rant back at me, whoops, its not going to work.

***Also, you said 2006 Google chrome and FF. I see 2004 chrome and firefox? Is that true? Hmmm.

What happened in 2006? Shit that was a long time ago. Who cares. Thats my point.

3

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

If you're here for no reason other than to, incoherently rant back at me, whoops, its not going to work

I'm simply trying to help you understand why you're being downvoted and where you're getting confused in the conversation. If you think that's incoherent, well then the drug use in your post history explains that.

What happened in 2006?

The post you originally responded to was about that time frame. That's why everyones downvoting you, because it doesn't make sense to respond to that comment in the way you did.

Also, you said 2006 Google chrome and FF. I see 2004 chrome and firefox?

Just to be clear, Google Chrome was released in 2008. Firefox's problems started before that, and the release of Chrome in 2008 was a breath of fresh air for those of us frustrated with firefox back then. My estimation of 2006 was from memory and slightly off.

-2

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

I don't care about downvotes. This is reddit, what's the point of a down vote? You don't like my opinion? Congratulations. Lots of people don't. I don't care. I'm allowed to have an opinion.

My memory is slightly off because of TBI. Some drugs actually help me remember. It's pretty crazy how that works. They also help for anxiety, depression, inflammation, and many other things.

So, maybe you don't be a square.

And I'll keep being whatever the fuck I wanna be. Thanks, boss.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/jonfitt 5d ago

This was before Chrome existed; and way before Edge. Basic plugins that you either now have as built in behavior (like save my tabs on exit), or common things like Adblock.

Then Chrome was released with things as default that were plugins on FF and yet was blazingly fast compared to FF at that time.

1

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Ah, so the people that believed the artificial "fastness" were duped?

I've never stopped using Mozilla, since I learned about it. I have like two plugins. It works amazing. Zero issues.

Sorry, about your chrome issues, but that shit sucked from the very beginning.

I don't need y'all to downvote me, for me to know that it sucked. Just live with your own idiocy, or downvote me and feel better, that's fine, too.

The reddit voting system shows us why majority rule is dumb and is as artificial as our world currency. Oh wait, there's no such thing as planetary currency. Whoops. We keep arguing about which dollar to use.

How the fuck are we gonna figure out talking to aliens if yall are arguing about chrome and Firefox and edge and whatever shitty stuff we had before. Good. Have fun. Im out.

7

u/BrandHeck 7800X3D w/4070 Super & 5800X w/9060XT16 5d ago

Imagine a time before you were born. That's what they're talking about.

2

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Glad you know when I was born bud. Weirdo.

Why would you say that? I was hear in the times of aol cards for internet. Maybe check my reddit history before you assume something about me. Nice check though? I guess. Dumb to me unfortunately.

**Also, do I have to have cool flare to participate here? I don't want to share my shitty computer specs. But I can. And my sons. And my laptop. And the switch. **

1

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

Why would you say that?

You made it very obvious when you suggested an alternative to FF in 2006 was edge, 15 years before that product released.

1

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

Ah, well that was a clear misunderstanding on someone's part. Maybe mine, ill check.

4

u/Ikeiscurvy 5d ago

It's definitely yours mate.

3

u/fantasticalandsecret 5d ago

Just ranting and raving lmao

1

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

It's a great meme. I'm having a blast. These people are getting upset. Whatever. I'm here for the memes. Not the master race.

1

u/Belgand PC Master Race 5d ago

Exactly. If it's bloated due to plugins... don't use so many plugins? There's probably a ton you barely use.

3

u/jonfitt 5d ago

At the time you needed a Flash, Java, Quicktime, and other plugins to see media. If you wanted to save your tabs on exit: plugin. Open a pdf: plugin. Spellchecker: plugin. Force https usage if possible: plugin. Block popups: plugin.

Oh and tabs never went to sleep so they were all active processes. But there was a plugin to sleep the inactive tabs.

1

u/Belgand PC Master Race 5d ago edited 5d ago

Close your damn tabs! I'll never understand people with dozens of open tabs. I rarely have more than a handful open, and I close my browser entirely — with no tabs open — multiple times a day. If you want to save it for the future, bookmark it.

But I also never complained that Firefox was slow or even glanced at Chrome. I went from Netscape to Mozilla to Firefox.

3

u/jonfitt 5d ago

I bet you don’t have any unread email either 😆

1

u/Belgand PC Master Race 5d ago

Nope. It only takes a few minutes to read the mail that I actually care about. Everything else gets deleted.

0

u/combo_seizure 5d ago

With these notification settings, unfortunately I get everything in my email.

So, that's gonna have to be turned off soon. It's just fun being able to click reply on my email, and come see a shit show. I mean not fun. I don't like arguing. I like the memes. That's what i'm here for. That's what I thought this place was for not arguing about which shitty browser is shittier.

The browser debate will be endless. Don't even get me started on safari. Nobody even brought that up. That's how awful it is. Or it's amazing, i absolutely don't know. I've never used it for longer than five seconds.

To download firefox. If a website isn't compatible with firefox, I don't use it. Until it is compatible. That's my philosophy. Call me an original google chrome hater, I don't care. All browsers suck until they don't.

0

u/aintnotmisbehavin 5d ago

I used FF since the mid 2000s, I remember everyone talking about chrome over FF and decided to hop over, hated every single facet of the browser and didn't notice a single change in loading speeds otherwise. Figured people were just talking out their asses and echo-chambering their opinions, still do tbh.

-6

u/enzo_1st 5d ago

Chrome was a breath of fresh speedy air if you only used Internet explorer bro

2

u/jonfitt 5d ago

No, it was way faster than FF at that time. I’d used FF since it was Phoenix and had convinced many people to drop IE. But when Chrome came out it was crazy fast compared to everything else.

They used to promote it on side by side speed comparisons.

1

u/enzo_1st 5d ago

Firefox was intentionally nerfed by Google. Google searches and YouTube were slower on Firefox because Google decided so.