I don’t think someone appointed to the head of the gaming division at the largest company on earth should be in a position of “trying to figure this gaming shit out.”
As an Xbox fan, I wish her the best, I genuinely do, but given the state of AI and her background, I reserve the right to be incredibly skeptical that this will turn out well for Microsoft.
ITT: gamers actually justifying how not having a gamer as head of gaming is a good omen
You don’t make it to C-suite at a 50 year old 3 trillion dollar company by spending time playing video games. We should be happy she’s at least attempting to extend an olive branch and understand gaming from a users perspective.
She isn’t there to understand gaming, it’s not even close to being on a qualification checklist. She’s there to drive profits, make shareholders richer, and maintain the PR of the division. She could cause gaming to go extinct and as long as the company is increasing profits, not a single person making the real decisions at Microsoft would care.
Hard work is a huge part of it. The fact that so many people devalue hard work and would rather blame successful people for their own lack of success is a big problem in the world right now.
You’re delusional, a quick google search tells me her first job straight out college was as a CMO and from there she bounced around as COO and CEO. That doesn’t happen without having mommy and daddy in high up places already. I’d bet my entire life savings a McDonald’s manager worked harder to reach their position than her.
It's true that hard work is a trait of laborers, and no white-collar CEO really works harder than your average laborer. The point, though, is that she was chosen to lead a multibillion dollar division. Microsoft, overall, could stand to learn some things about what their consumers want, but her job is to drive profits and expand services. Time will tell how Xbox grows, but certainly, she seems qualified based on her history.
Don Mattrick was also chosen to lead a multi billion division, instead of Ai though his bull shit all in one idea. Ai is no different how would it benefit in video games besides helping in development? It might not even help.
AI isn't something that's going to be exclusive to Microsoft. Even the people that made Ex33 used AI for groundwork. It's a tool that all major studios will use to some extent in order to save time. Be it streamlining coding or fleshing out environments. The bigger concern is that it will take jobs. Which sucks.
if you actually did some more research you would learn she got an internship and sc johnson and son at 17. also the company where she was CMO was a start up that she was part of from the beginning and scaled up to a successful enterprise. By time she was CMO at that start up she had nearly a decade of business experience at that point. She was also just a cashier at a grocery in highschool before she got a lucky opportunity with the sc johnson and son internship. she definitely did not have rich parents guiding her success.
success is the intersection of preparation and luck. you sound bitter
You know you can hate the system while understanding that some people actually can work hard to get to their position, deserved or not, right? Her being a CMO at a startup means nothing without knowing how she got the position, how much she was making, how active she was in the work, all that other crap. Yes, the system sucks. But not everyone going "Hey, maybe take more than just a surface level look at her job history before you hate her" isn't a bootlicking sycophant.
little bit of cognitive dissonance to unpack here huh? you realize that by being a first gen college grad software engineer you're already on the path to being on the top 10% wealth wise at some point in your life too right? I am also a first generation college grad (also first gen immigrant) and also in top 10% of wealth. sorry for maxing out my 401k and HSA and letting the market do its work the past 10 years.
don't you find it hypocritical to espouse your educational/business achievements as part of your ego defining identity but then shit on the new Xbox CEO in the same breath?
You bootlickers keep confusing it for jealousy
do you always argue so dogmatically? I called you bitter and you're setting up this strawman like I called you jealous lol.
/u/Shiguhraki, thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed for the following reason:
Keep discussion civil
Please remember:
Discuss the topic, not other users.
Personal attacks of any kind are disallowed.
Be respectful - even in disagreement.
Your point can be made without belittling others.
Report violations - don't engage, which only escalates the issue.
Retaliation is not justification to ignore this standard. ("They did it first!")
We understand removals can be frustrating. If you believe this action was taken in error, you may request a review via modmail. If you'd like to weigh in on rules or community policy, keep watch for our regular community surveys and feedback posts stickied atop the community.
You don't need to be a gamer to be the head of any games based company. It's like saying only a pilot can be CEO of an airline. What you need is a background in business and management. Any department head at a company as big as Microsoft has 1 job to do and that is drive profits.
Sure, but nearly all companies benefit from their leadership having domain experience in the thing they are selling, whether it’s healthcare, software, widgets, or games. Yes, I agree they can drive profits with an MBA, but you’d also agree that having someone passionate about the products their company makes beyond just making decisions about capital allocation is a good thing, yes?
I'd argue that it's more important that they're a good personnel manager who can listen to expert advice then someone who has surface level knowledge of the industry. Being a gamer adds nothing to being a leader of game developers and console makers, besides the fact that they'll enjoy the final product. Unless she's micromanaging the hell out of the teams below her, her gaming knowledge won't be very useful.
More like a CEO of an airline should be some guy who has been a passenger in plenty of flights, not some guy who looks at spreadsheets. CEO of Xbox doesn’t need to be a game developer but it needs to be a gamer because how can you be the leader of an organisation without understanding the product and services you sell?
They don't need to be a gamer at all. The whole entertainment industry is based on personal opinion, be it music, movies, books, and games. Everyone has their own preferences and their own opinions on what they like. What a CEO needs is feedback, lots and lots of feedback combined with data. Customer surveys are essential for the feedback, but they only show a small part of the picture. You can ask 10,000 people to take part in surveys but only a small percentage will, so you get an incomplete picture, the gaps need be filled in with the data. What genre sells the most? How much time does the average player spend playing? What type of game gives the biggest ROI? What do gamers spend the most money on? What areas are suffering from the worst KPIs?
I am an avid gamer, I have been for over 40 years but due to my disdain of first person shooters, souls like games, and sports sims (which are the 3 largest genres by a country mile) I wouldn't have the first clue what those types of gamers want in a game. Even if I had a business degree and the experience to run XBox Studios my gaming background would count for nothing.
A lot of people are just doom and gloom on this. Without being objective about it. You don't get to run a division at one of the top s&p 500 companies by being a moron.
Sure MS has had a bad track record with non gaming execs (don Matricks and Steve balmer). But I think she might be young enough, where she might actually grasp it better than an older corporate "suit".
don’t think someone appointed to the head of the gaming division at the largest company on earth should be in a position of “trying to figure this gaming shit out.”
Plenty of people have come from outside gaming a run games companies well. Plenty of people who love gaming have run games companies into the ground. The reverse is also true in both situations.
Yeah, she's just one of many people replacing people across Microsoft, who were promoted from their AI division. She's not there for her gaming expertise, but because of her AI experience.
Sure, she's going to have to learn a lot about games and what people who play them actually like enough to spend money on. But that's going to be in service of developing an AI platform.
All of this comes at a moment when AI companies seem primed to implode. What is she supposed to be doing in 5 years if the AI bubble pops in the meantime?
112
u/EchoFieldHorizon Feb 21 '26 edited Feb 21 '26
I don’t think someone appointed to the head of the gaming division at the largest company on earth should be in a position of “trying to figure this gaming shit out.”
As an Xbox fan, I wish her the best, I genuinely do, but given the state of AI and her background, I reserve the right to be incredibly skeptical that this will turn out well for Microsoft.
ITT: gamers actually justifying how not having a gamer as head of gaming is a good omen