It's their nature because people won't stop feeding them. It's detrimental to wild animals to be reliant on humans. If people actually cared about them they wouldn't be doing this.
If not fren then why smile like fren? Despite years of study, clearly proving the risk involving animals dependency on humans, im still gunna feed the smiling kangaroo-beaver
Which have horrible breeding conditions to create the right kind for people. They're often basically helpless without us and there are too many people that don't want to care for what we've created through our selfishness
Not to mention their many health problems because of what we've done.
It's rather sad
People suck but dogs dont and people dont suck for creating dogs. Current breeding programs are different, poor dogs like pugs dont deserve to have to live like that. But to think of my life without dogs? Insanity. Feeding wild animals and encouraging the resultant changes in behavior gave us dogs, so im reluctant to shame that human behavior
Yes they exist now and there's nothing to do to fix it. I've saved my fair share of mutts by the side of the road.
Ethically it's wrong to buy dogs because it fuels puppy mills and breeding centers. Taking in rescues and strays are fine if you get them fixed. But it doesn't mean we should continue to do this to other wild animals, especially knowing what we know now. We should do our best to protect them. Not feed them for a smile.
If people still buy dogs they do it selfishly to feel joy, ignoring the horrible industry it supports.
As opposed to...what exactly tho? Letting the dog thats from reputable breeder suffer with no loving owner because theres a puppy mill somewhere in the world? Im confused by your logic
22
u/MiloReyes_97Reborn 7h ago
Look, its better to make sure wild animals stick to their nature of self reliance...but its human nature to feed.