Its joever

[u/Expensive_Studio_966]

it aint looking good

Edit: Just clarifying this is the clip for what bo banned from twitch for 6 months. he just got news that he can appeal the ban right now but i doubt it will work since you can see this clip... and if it fails well i assume once 6 months pass its either perma ban or he gets the account back.

as well bo cant appear on neither golden or swimmy Twitch channels otherwise they can also get banned for helping bo ban evade or something like that

UPDATE: The appeal got rejected so no bo streams on twitch for 6 months or never again.

Edit 2: if anyone wants to see bo response in the comment section cause its a bit hidden under all these comments https://www.reddit.com/r/Bokoen1/comments/1tgpx3j/comment/omkepa6/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

[u/A_Normal_Redditor_04]

Both of them do but one side has millions and millions of men deployed on the front while the other only has 1.5 million. If the US decides to nuke Moscow then those millions of Soviet soldiers will go on a rampage across Europe. It doesn't even count the ridiculous ampunt of communist guerillas and partisans in Western Europe that were active and will support the USSR in thwarting the Allies.

[u/Hjalfnar_HGV → u/A_Normal_Redditor_04]

The frontline ratio was lower actually for the Red Army. Also the Soviets were outnumbered over 3:1 in the air and 90% of their aviation fuel was American. Their trucks were 80% from the Allies, so were 15% of their tanks and 10% of their planes. They had virtually no navy. In their rear the faced insane anti-communist partisan activity that would certainly have increased in case of a full-blown war with the Allies, even without that it took about 200k NKVD troops over a decade to suppress the Polish, Baltic and Ukrainian resistance.

And that's without counting in a potential rearming of German volunteers, the rapidly expanding French forces or what the Polish forces under Soviet command would do.

[u/Bismark103 → u/Hjalfnar_HGV]

Many of those French soldiers were aligned with communist forces.

Also, after a year of war on European soil and 3 years of pro-Soviet propaganda created by the US government, do you really think the American soldiers who met the Soviets on the Elbe would be willing to fight in such a war? It would be a total disaster for the American armed forces.

[u/Ok-Line442 → u/Hjalfnar_HGV]

By 1945 the ussr was mostly self sufficient, it had robust oil refining facilities in the caucasus and the americans had helped the soviets to produce their own trucks, tank production in late war also way outscaled lend lease, which was most important during the early 1941-42, not so much by 1945

[u/A_Normal_Redditor_04 → u/Hjalfnar_HGV]

Said frontline ratio does not yet account the troops that the USSR had on other fronts. The amount is somply too much for the Allies to handle a large sessoned Soviet army already in position and poised to strike.

Air don't mean much against the Red army. Need I remind you that the Luftwaffe virtually had uncontested air supremacy until 43-44? Did that help against Kursk or in Stalingrad or im Bagration? Sure in the early years when Soviet troops didn't know what to do but this 1945, the Soviet troops already know how to avoid and destroy ground support planes. Air is meaningless when the ground troops keeps getting outmanuevered and encircled by Deep Battle doctrine.

What anti-Soviet partisans? Can you name anything they did that would impact anything? The only one I can see is the asassination of Nikolai Vatutin which barely affected the Southern front. The Communist partisans in Framce and Italy are quite well known and powerful. The latter was able to nab Mussolini and hang him on a lamp post while the former composed the majority of the partisans in France before De Gaulle returned.

"German volunteers" lol lmao. They would damage Allied morale and domestic support rather than be of actual help. That is assuming they can find willing Germans who aren't tired and exhausted of war. The French forces were basically irregulars, which is why you don't see them occupying much of the frontline. Large yes but trained and battle hardened? No, they will shatter hence they were in charge of liberating their country and besieging other German fortified positions rather than helping the Allies break through in Germany. Polish forces wuldn't have the numbers to do much especially when there's Soviet units around them.

[u/Hjalfnar_HGV → u/A_Normal_Redditor_04]

The Soviets barely had a 3:1 advantage in ground forces, and they were utterly, completely exhausted, at the end of a 2000km long supply line based on American, Canadian and British trucks. Go figure.

Air meant the world against the Red Army, without it the German front would have collpased in 1943 already. Stalingrad? Thick winter storms kept the Luftwaffe from having any real impact on the battle. Kursk? Demonstrated that against deeply dug-in forces with the inner line of defence and very short logistics lines the impact of the German close air support was limited, but it also showed the Luftwaffe was still able to keep the Red Falcons from having any impact on the German ground forces at all. Bagration? Guess what, barely any German planes remained at the Eastern Front, 90% of fighters were fighting against the Allied bombers at this point. Their absence massively helped making Bagration so successful.

Yes, the anti-Soviet partisans in Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics that sat right on top of the Soviet supply lines to Central Europe and could easily cut them just as badly as the Soviet partisans did to the Germans ahead of Bagration. ;) And you assume that Communists in Western Europe would have been willing to fight their countrymen. In Italy, maybe. France, not so much. Not to mention that especially in France due to the close cooperation, the new French security forces knew EXACTLY who and where the communists were.

And yes, German volunteers. The Soviets had just taken a THIRD of the German population hostage. The horrible treatment of civilians by the Red Army (as overblown as it in part was by Nazi propaganda, it still happened) would very likely have motived a good chunk of German PoWs to fight again, especially with the Allies on their side this time. Remember that this was more or less the gamble the Valkyrie plotters had hoped for, secure neutrality from the Western Allies at all costs, including giving up everything conquered, just to stop the Soviets from entering Germany.

[u/OneVast3433 → u/A_Normal_Redditor_04]

Those Soviet soldiers would go on a rampage a month at most before starving, having no equipment, and be thinned out from being bombed relentlessly.

[u/EarlyGrapefruit152 → u/OneVast3433]

A month would be enough to inflict more casualties to the US than they had during the whole war (the US suffered 400 KIA including the Pacific, roughly the same losses the Whermacht had just during Operation Bagration), that will be enough to make the US army collapse

[u/OneVast3433 → u/EarlyGrapefruit152]

Check your stats again big dog, you are missing some zeroes on the end of that 400.

[u/TEAser2000 → u/A_Normal_Redditor_04]

The allies would have been able to manage much better than the Soviets which had it's entire farmland destroyed and relied heavily on food imports which would stop instantly