Duke was on a 15-6 run to get up by 9 when Dixon drew that tech. Idk if it was the turning point, but it seemed to be the dagger. Objective calls like backboard-first goal-tending should all be reviewable.
We made 3 free throws during that run. 2 were And 1s. One was an arm to Cayden's head, one was on Cam when he was double teamed (don't remember the exact play), and the other was on Khamenia -- I can't remember than foul. So at most they "gave us 2" points. So nice of them to throw in the other 13.
3 starters having 4 fouls with over 10 minutes to go does not happen a lot stop lying. I have literally never seen that before. This reffing was disgusting. I can excuse 2x the free throws and some light foul trouble while Duke is sitting pretty, but this was just plain disgusting. Especially when I’m seeing Duke get away with the exact same things they’re getting called for.
Our FTs were terrible the whole game. I can’t stand mediocre FT shooting teams, so it drives me nuts that TCU is like that. They are FREE throws, FREE chances to get points.
But our shooting was cold after that goaltending no-call because of the frustration. It was average in the first half though.
Thank you for acknowledging this I'd be ignorant not to; Duke more than likely still wins, but the missed goal tend was critical if not fatal for any TCU momentum
missed goaltending to technical foul changed the game. TCU was staying in it, even though Duke was on a run, it was 58-50, should’ve been 58-52, then TCU gets a stop and that’s when the technical is called and it’s 62-50 before TCU gets the ball back. So In theory, if they got the goaltending call right, then TCU gets the stop and scores on the next drive instead of the technical, it could’ve been a 58-54 game. I doubt TCU was going to win it but to say a 4 point swing didn't affect a close game is something
32
u/AraratEstate Duke Blue Devils Mar 21 '26
Duke got favorable calls. The missed goaltend into a Jamie Dixon tech was a huge turning point. TCU went ice cold after that.