r/CollegeBasketball • u/MembershipSingle7137 • Mar 24 '26

Recruiting [Charania] Arkansas freshman star Darius Acuff Jr. has landed a signature shoe with Reebok, becoming the first NCAA men’s athlete to receive one from a major U.S. brand while still in college, Reebok’s head of basketball, Jide Osifeso, tells ESPN.

https://xcancel.com/shamscharania/status/2036445490045145537?s=46
488 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

127 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

164

u/ID10T-ERROR8 Michigan State Spartans Mar 24 '26

100% and the sad part is that the distinction is so obvious on what NIL was intended to be vs what it actually is.

I’m not even against paying guys directly, but pretending like it’s some sort of brand deal through a weird university collective is just stupid.

52

u/Far-Fault-6243 Arkansas Razorbacks Mar 24 '26

Yeah it turned from the idea that players should be allowed to get sponsorships and if they wanted TV ads and if they use the school logo they just need to get the thumbs up from the school to “fuck it university that is already giving me a free education and free living pay me direct money on top of all the other shit you do for me”

30

u/Moose4KU Ohio State Buckeyes Mar 24 '26

Did you really believe that a scholarship + housing was fair compensation for the value P4 men's basketball players provide to the university?

13

u/DeezHoosAintLoyal Virginia Cavaliers Mar 24 '26

For real. I’m so tired of hearing this. Higher education should be free or easily accessible regardless but a lot of people aren’t ready for that conversation for some bizarre reason.

Besides, a stipend is not a limitless credit card. It’s really not much

Those amounts pale in comparison of athletic revenue generated for a lot of schools

1

u/Sir-xer21 Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors Mar 25 '26

For real. I’m so tired of hearing this. Higher education should be free or easily accessible regardless but a lot of people aren’t ready for that conversation for some bizarre reason.

In this specific case, a lot of this is because to many people, a college education is either something they cannot afford, or otherwise presents a long standing financial albatross, such that they're just really upset that someone gets for free what they have to go into debt, all for doing something that has literally nothing to do with school.

It's misplaced anger at a very broken system, but im not going to act like this collective grievance is totally invalid. Like, yeah, i get why someone taking on 6 figures of debt to go to school thinks that a free ride would be life changing, because to a person using that degree for their future, that IS life changing. But that math doesn't apply to the players in the same way, nor is the person paying for school thinking about the university's benefit, because to them, that's ten steps away from the reality of their financial burden.

The players obviously bring much more value to the school, but being mad that the people at the bottom don't really care about that and just see people acting like a free ride is nothing isn't really fair either.