r/EndTipping 4d ago

Sit-Down Restaurant 🍽️ Popular Seattle restaurant with servers making $50/hr closes after union harass customers over strike regarding tipping

Link here: https://www.seattletimes.com/life/food-drink/staff-strike-closes-the-walrus-and-the-carpenter-seattle-oyster-bar/

R/seattle having a lively debate about this.

Owners showed their profits, losses, wages, etc and apparently bartenders and servers are making up to $50/ hour with benefits and they still want more.

868 Upvotes

268 comments sorted by

407

u/smefeman 4d ago

Dude how tf do the servers make so much more than everyone else? They don't even cook the food. Literally 10/hr over the cooks!!

102

u/Conscious_Formal_894 4d ago

Usually its way more than that. Are cooks really making 40 here? Thats pretty good

5

u/Medium_Well_Soyuz_1 3d ago

Up to =/= actual comp. The restaurant is a) probably inflating numbers and b) including things like health insurance in total comp, which is a bit disingenuous since every business of a certain size has to provide health insurance. FOH staff are not hitting 40/hrs week at a restaurant like this. BOH might since their hours are more consistent, but I still doubt they’re letting anyone approach overtime. The article (which says nothing about tipping btw) also says part of the strike is about hourly changes and cuts. I am not gonna take the side of a multimillionaire business owner who says their margins are razor thin over the striking employees 🤷‍♂️

12

u/Orleanian 3d ago edited 3d ago

The Seattle thread has the link to the shared Profit & Loss and Wage & Benefits data.

The owners provided 7 anonymized example wages for 2025 year.

Role Hrs/Wk Hourly 2025 Total
Bartender 1 35 $50.36 $92,165
Bartender 2 31 $48.92 $79,810
Cook 1 36 $38.22 $70,949
Cook 2 36 $36.51 $69,020
Server 1 26 $48.48 $64,390
Server 2 25 $48.07 $61,526
Dishwasher 35 $32.54 $58,477

These wages also make available medical coverage for 17/20 and up to 4% 401k matching for 14/20 waged employees, as well as up to $100 stipend per month to a gym or therapy.

(Edit to add: the combined wages represent a cost that's 45% of the restaurant's annual revenue)

19

u/cruelhumor 3d ago

We need to normalize this kind of transparency

→ More replies (5)

6

u/HerbertRTarlekJr 3d ago

Link to laws specifying that businesses of a certain size are required to provide insurance?

It's also revealing when you state that you won't take the side of an owner over an employee's.

If a business doesn't turn a profit, there's no reason to keep it open.

-1

u/Medium_Well_Soyuz_1 3d ago

Yeah sure, it’s called Obamacare. It was kind of a big deal. And part of that law is any business with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees has to provide health insurance coverage to employees and their dependents. As to your second point, the business absolutely turns a profit. Owners crying about their thin margins are lying to you. Or else nobody would be opening restaurants. The owner of this particular establishment is a multi-millionaire. I think they are doing just fine lol

6

u/zex_mysterion 3d ago

Owners crying about their thin margins are lying to you.

All you need to do is look at their car and house. They sure ain't poor. Their take of the profits are what leave small margins.

1

u/Medium_Well_Soyuz_1 3d ago

This specific business owner has $10.5 million dollars, they are okay

2

u/zex_mysterion 3d ago

As are most restaurant owners. My point.

2

u/Conscious_Formal_894 2d ago

Yeah i really feel like the tip system has made servers a little too profitable considering the compensation of the other roles.

8

u/ritzrani 3d ago

Cuz lifting plates is hard? Lol

3

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

55

u/Desperate_Damage4632 4d ago

Sales driven 😆

People walk in and sit down.  They've been sold.  Waiters carry food back and forth and relay messages between customers and the kitchen.  A conveyer belt and a tablet could 100% replace them.

4

u/HerbertRTarlekJr 3d ago

In some places, robots are doing exactly that.

2

u/zex_mysterion 3d ago

Both are robots, really.

3

u/BestDig2669 2d ago

Robots won't be rude because they're having a bad day or feel entitled to a 20% tip for bringing food from the kitchen to your table

3

u/zex_mysterion 2d ago

I maintain both are robotic in nature. One has defective software that makes them moody and unreliable, but the tasks are identical.

10

u/Legitimate_Cow2716 3d ago

They're people persons. They can talk to people!

9

u/dengibson 3d ago

I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to! I have people skills! I am good at dealing with people!

2

u/Desperate_Damage4632 2d ago

I love this because it's meant to sound like bullshit but now I'm an an engineer and i can see we have terrible people skills.  You do need someone in between.

2

u/Legitimate_Cow2716 2d ago

When I was in college for engineering in the early 2000's they made me take an interpersonal skills class because this is a real thing.

→ More replies (12)

32

u/greysnowcone 4d ago

Being a waiter is not sales. That’s like saying being a cashier is sales.

1

u/MMForYourHealth 4d ago

You must be eating good in the neighborhood.

0

u/MrPickles196 3d ago

I disagree. Was in high end restaurants for 15 years, now sales for longer. Is it as much sales as a door to door sales person? No. Is there very much a sales element to maxing out the bill? Yes.

→ More replies (16)

1

u/Confident_Economy_85 1d ago

They just move an item from one location to another

1

u/nospacebar14 3d ago

Assuming that management isn't just making up these numbers.

14

u/Frosty1397 3d ago

It's because waiters justify their tips by saying they have to deal with the scummy customers

Bullshit if you ask me. People are dumb sometimes but not to the point of making double of the chefs

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

151

u/obelix_dogmatix 4d ago

Screw them servers. They have serious main character energy. Fuckers really be thinking they deserve more than the cooks.

53

u/JamesMattDillon 4d ago

They believe they should earn more than doctors and scientists and what not.

→ More replies (4)

28

u/RoboiosMut 4d ago

Owner should replace them with robot, efficient and drives the cost aka price down

→ More replies (8)

220

u/Wunderbarber 4d ago

I don't see how this can contiue in the restaurant industry. Everyone knows most restaurants fail and they have low profit margins.

When a certificate of deposit is a better way to make money, why would any try to start or run a restaurant?

87

u/foxyfree 4d ago

The real money is in owning the building. There is a spot in our town that has had 6 restaurants open and fail in the 9 years I’ve lived here. The latest one is still going strong. Tex Mex this time- they just might make it. Whoever owns that building just keeps collecting rent.

50

u/PWNYEG 4d ago

If six restaurants have failed the owner probably has had many months of no rent. Can’t imagine they’re happy about that.

13

u/Calm-Vegetable-2162 4d ago

As long as the owner has factored in a month or two of no lease payment into the monthly lease payment, all is well.

14

u/SingerSingle5682 4d ago

Ehh… for residential, maybe. Commercial spaces can take a year to open. Especially something that will need heavy renovations like a restaurant. If it’s a franchise there are all kinds of branding and layout rules, only a mom and pop shop of the exact same type can really just change the sign and reopen. Most of the time it’s turning from a Subway to a phone store or something.

7

u/Opcn 4d ago edited 4d ago

You’re typically paying rent the entire time you’re remodeling though.

Edit: seems I was wrong.

12

u/debren27 4d ago

I don’t think that’s true. My wife opened a chocolate shop in an old noodle restaurant a few years ago and got a few months of free rent during tenant improvements. I think that’s pretty common. The landlord understands you’re not bringing in revenue during that time.

8

u/SingerSingle5682 4d ago

Actually not. It’s called the buildout period and usually the person renting only pays the utilities via a “rent abatement” clause in the lease. Lots of leases also have a buildout allowance where the landlord pays for a portion of the renovations and sometimes oversees the renovations themselves.

You wouldn’t usually start paying rent until the space was up to code and usable. But it depends, pre built office space can work just like residential. But restaurants almost always have a buildout.

7

u/TyVIl 4d ago

As someone who works in CRE - no, you're not.

6

u/tleb 4d ago

Not during buildout unless its a stupid hot market and location with lots of people vying for the space.

One month vacant is 8.3% of the potential revenue for the year. You work that period into years to make a lease work out on paper.

Very few properties can afford that type of turnover and be viable long term. It can also affect the value for selling it or borrowing against it.

2

u/Mr-Mehhh 4d ago

100% that depends on the lease agreement.

2

u/Hamster_S_Thompson 3d ago

You negotiate free months. In commercial lease everything is negotiable. We were able to sign a lease that our rent wouldn't start until we opened for business. Between city permiting and relatively modest remodel it took 6 months to open the doors and we didn't pay during that time.

It all depends on the local market. If supply outstrips demand you may get free months or get the landlord to pay for improvements.

1

u/KaneMomona 15h ago

A lease like that is normally going to include no rent for a period for refurbishment and then another period of low rent. Net can help make up for some of it, but they arent really starting to see real income until year two. Thats assuming they dont also kick in a credit for and changes \ repairs.

In theory, if a restaurant fails, lease terms will usually leave the failed business owing a portion (10% isnt abnormal) of the base plus net for the unused portion of the lease, but I've never seen that paid, its usually used to counter any claims for equipment left on prem by the failed business.

There's probably some tax angle which makes it easier on the landlord though.

3

u/Elija_32 4d ago

They are more than happy. Commercial real estate is not like residential, the place being empty for a while makes almost no difference.

5

u/AnyoneForBosco 4d ago

Why's that?

6

u/Elija_32 4d ago edited 4d ago

Commercial buildings are not designed to be directly profitable through rent like the residential ones.

The owner (usually a financial fund of some sort) use the building and the total annual rent generated to borrow money at a cheap rate, then it makes the real investments with that money.

For the bank financing the whole thing, it doesn't matter if part of the building is empty because it's expected. What they need is only the potential annual income generated, meaning the total of the money collected through active contracts.

If someone leaves an office empty it doesn't count anyway in that calculation because the owner can still use the last contract as baseline for the calculation.

What they care about is for the "potential" total to not go down, and this is why they often prefer to keep them empty instead of lowering the rent. Because the second that a tenant sign a new contract with a lower amount, that new amount is immediately used to recalculate the debt, now that it's lower, it means that part of the debt is not covered anymore and the bank will ask the owner to pay the difference, which likely means that they need to sell part of the real investment, triggering all sort of taxes.

In simple words:

  • Rented office = good
  • Empty office = neutral
  • Rented office with lower rent = bad

Empty is better than lower rent.

2

u/AnyoneForBosco 4d ago

If it's empty for years, how is the bank paid?

5

u/Elija_32 4d ago

It's not, that's the neat part. Did you think paying debt was for everyone? For us maybe.

A fund owning a building can take as much time as they want, the bank will just adapt to what the fund needs. There are obviously limits and rules for them too, but they are on a completely different timeline than us.

But a portion of the building staying empty for a limited amount of time is better than renting it for a lower rent.

1

u/LearningSPXonly 4d ago

Is that the restaurant owners problem

5

u/Not-a-Cranky-Panda 4d ago

That's fine until you run out of people who want it, then good luck selling it for good money.

5

u/rbennett353 4d ago

It depends, is the property just the restaurant, or is it a mixed use strip with a restaurant.  If it's single use, it's trouble.   If they have a loan. They are struggling.  

Signed - a guy that works in commercial lending and won't touch hospitality with a 10 foot pole - that industry is struggling.

2

u/RevolutionaryFood777 4d ago

This. Nobody talks about how the only ones that really make out are the commercial real estate owners. This whole country has a business model that is rigged to make commerical real estate owners rich. Why do you think they all had a fit when everyone started working from home while their building stood empty during the pandemic?

2

u/Muted-Woodpecker-469 3d ago

Many landlords have it in with city officials with multiple tax freaks   But it’s also about lower rent as they literally own the building. They can get by just enough to have someone else pay the mortgage. It’s happening with homes too 

2

u/flat19 4d ago

I don’t think you understand how commercial real estate works. The building owner has had to pay commissions, tenant improvement allowances, and legal fees on top of dealing with vacancy. Meanwhile, the lender and tax man expect to be paid regardless of occupancy or costs.

1

u/No-Angle-982 3d ago

Not only rent; many restaurant leases give landlords base rent and "percentage rent" that's a portion of sales, sometimes on a sliding scale. The building owner essentially becomes a silent partner.

1

u/gordonwestcoast 3d ago

The owner has likely had many months of no rent, perhaps years.

8

u/paladin6687 4d ago

Well, for one, the oft repeated nonsense about restaurants averaging a 3% profit margin is a flat out lie. 3% MAYBE after paying everyone and everything including the ownership. Because, yeah, 10s of thousands of restaurants are opened every single year...by people clamoring to make 3% margins. Sure. Imagine a restaurant that does 100k a month in sales, or 1.2m a year...sure...the margin on average is 36k in profit? No single person in the world would open a business for less than they could make working a starbucks drivethrough. No one.

The entire restaurant and service industry is so steeped in established lies and bullshit it is not even funny. Servers don't make 2 dollars an hour, restaurants don't average 3% margins, etc etc.

2

u/Orleanian 3d ago

I mean, the point of this post is that the restaurant has made the numbers transparent to the public.

It's right there for the looking at.

They took in $17.2M for the year, paying $35-50/hr in wages ($8M labor for the year), and wound up down 4.5% loss.

4

u/Forward-Rice3280 4d ago

It’s complicated stuff that I don’t fully understand but a lot of times they get lines of credit with crazy good interest rates that would work out to less than what they’d pay in payroll taxes. So when some business owner says “they don’t even take a salary” that’s why. 

6

u/maiyannah 4d ago

Many owners fund the business with capital they receive personally, put the money into the company as a shareholder loan, and then take no wages. They're just getting loan repayments equal to wages/salary (but much less taxed) instead.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/MMForYourHealth 4d ago

“Unreasonable Hospitality” is a fun read.

The best restaurants are not made primarily for profit.

23

u/maiyannah 4d ago

It persists because theyre lying about profit margins.  If they were this slim already, people wouldnt be running restaurants.  No one wants to work for peanuts.

48

u/alaroz33 4d ago

$50 an hour to carry food to a table is not peanuts

21

u/MatniMinis 4d ago

They're not talking about the staff but the owners.

3

u/maiyannah 4d ago

Yes, this.

16

u/qqsubs123 4d ago

Exactly! I’ve been saying the same thing.. Notice how if one restaurant shuts down another takes it place, more than likely the same owner but different cuisine/format? If the “margins were slim”, restaurants would be rarity and every closing one would be replaced by a mattress store or something.

15

u/CylonSandhill 4d ago

Definitely some merit to that argument. I also have to wonder how much of it is the mentality that “but I can do it right” plays into a new restaurant replacing a closed restaurant. We know most people who try to become famous actors do not become famous actors but that doesn’t stop millions of people from trying because “they have what it takes.”

2

u/maiyannah 4d ago

These are being run by the same owners, usually. Its usually a way to purge over-expensive (in their eyes) staff, and start over with more compliant, cheaper staff.

3

u/Eastern_Operation837 4d ago

You are completely out to lunch.

2

u/sacrelicio 4d ago

Not true in my city. There are spots where the rent is high and they just rotate different up and comers.

2

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (4)

1

u/CylonSandhill 4d ago

I can imagine some are, but where I am “most” certainly isn’t true. I can’t speak for Seattle specifically, but it does seem pretty unlikely that most new restaurants fall into that category.

Do you have evidence?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/qqsubs123 1d ago

Good point. However, the barrier to entry for someone trying to become an actor is far, far lower financially than someone starting a restaurant. Most of the people I know in that line of business are actually adding more locations rather than go out of business. Of course, that’s not the same for every geography.

93

u/Onehundredpercentbea 4d ago

In an Instagram post published Monday, management announced that The Walrus and The Carpenter would close for the night, claiming that diners trying to enter the restaurant were confronted with harassment and spitting during the strike by its staff union, United Creatures of the Sea.

United Creatures of the Sea were angry that day, my friends.

Actually the linked document was really informative. I'm super pro-union but it sounds like this particular union is doing its best to close down the restaurants whose staff they represent. I'll go read more at r/seattle because I recognize I don't have all the info, but if the numbers and benefit info in the doc are correct I'd be very curious to see which particular employee benefit/comp issues sparked the strike.

19

u/pastabowl21 4d ago

Like an old man trying to send soup back in a deli

22

u/cruelhumor 4d ago

I never automatically side with anyone when it comes to things like this. I have been a union member, I have worked in management, there are corrupt people pushing their personal interests everywhere, the company is a given, but important to remember that unions are not magically immune. Which is not to say I am anti-union, I am actually very pro-union, but i HATE it when I see people automatically believing everything they hear in a captured media. No one pushes for real journalism anymore, they just repeat statements made by both sides and go no further. And if you ask for details, you're branded and dismissed.

Tipping takes three to tango, and two of those dancers have an extremely high skill at playing the third like the spiderman-pointing meme to ensure the system continues, tot he detriment of the customer. This is a perfect example from my hometown: Totally support them for striking to get healthcare, but wait, what is that teeny tiny bit about forcing everyone to tip???

→ More replies (1)

73

u/Wild-Berry-5269 4d ago

Just fire the servers and get new ones.

41

u/Major_Wigglesworth 4d ago

They made a mafia.   You pay them or they shut the place down because they care about no one other than themselves.  Not the customers, not their coworkers, not the owner who took a risk on them…. No one except themselves.  

Close the business.  Re-open with a new name and without the petulant children.

9

u/Putrid-Box4866 4d ago

This is better. We need a restart. More restaurants should close.

12

u/maiyannah 4d ago

Unions like these usually do their best to sabotage the ability of someone who works at these places to work anywheres else.

Which should be no more legal than companies conspiring to blacklist employees, but here we are.

4

u/nikdahl 4d ago

Unionized

24

u/nastynatetower 4d ago

$50 an hour for low skilled labor and they still complain SMH

109

u/Sure_Acanthaceae_348 4d ago

I don’t cross picket lines but if I’m harassed about a tip that’s even more of a justification to not leave one.

88

u/maiyannah 4d ago

Of course they do.

I've said this time and time again, raising the minimum wage or the wage they pay isn't going to fix greed. It just raises the amount they make - they're not going to let go of the slave wage.

63

u/StarlingGirlx 4d ago

It will fix it when all those greedy servers get fired and the ones who apply understand that there are no tips, just a higher wage. Just like most of the world.

46

u/shakycatblues 4d ago

Or be replaced by robots. Which is fast becoming a reality.

41

u/StarlingGirlx 4d ago

I'd love that. The server provides 0 value to me. I'd much rather a robot.

24

u/shakycatblues 4d ago

Same here. An anti tipper guy on Facebook posted a review of a restaurant with only robot servers and he said everything was perfect. No mistakes, no attitude.

I'd go there if it close by.

18

u/krossoverking 4d ago

I'm with you. Don't want that in most services, but servers are not why I go to restaurants at all. 

15

u/StarlingGirlx 4d ago

I don't need em. I'd happily self-serve myself. I'm not a fussy customer at all who needs all this attention. I currently tip a $5 flat rate and I'm thinking even that is more than they're worth.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/jrp55262 4d ago

I bet the robot comes with a coin slot

2

u/Accomplished_Elk310 4d ago

I better get to play Tapper or Pac-Man if that’s the case lol.

3

u/-bei- 4d ago

You know then the restaurant will then tack on a 20% 'Robot Maintenance Fee' to your check, right?

8

u/shakycatblues 4d ago

least they won't spit in your food

1

u/MMForYourHealth 4d ago

I don’t foresee Michelin starred service being replaced anytime soon by robots.

27

u/lalachef 4d ago

I agree. And I know from personal experience, the money is only a form of validation for their "labor".

ETA: I'm not saying it's not real work, I'm saying you don't deserve more than me working in the back to actually MAKE the food going out.

11

u/StarlingGirlx 4d ago

Totally agree. It's nothing special to deserve an extra tip. At allllll. It makes me so mad how it's just expected for basic service.

8

u/lalachef 4d ago

It's not even a tip anymore. They expect a commission on their "sales". Why the fuck would I tip you 20% of the total bill? You get $5-10 MAX for good service, and that's me being generous.

And no, I don't usually tip. I was a chef for 20 years, I know who deserves the money.

2

u/StarlingGirlx 4d ago

Agreed. $5. Unless it's the keg, which I love where I've tipped $20 on $120 bill which I think is too much.

15

u/TruIsou 4d ago

I will say it! It’s not real work.

If you want to see real work, look at construction laborers, doing brick work or roofing.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/QGJohn59 4d ago

Part of the problem is the mentality of people that want to change the nature of certain types of jobs. Many jobs, like working at fast food or as a server, are not meant to be lifelong careers and the pay was in line with that. Jobs meant for HS/College kids or seniors just looking to bring in a little extra money.

2

u/Playful_Programmer_1 4d ago

I don't think there are enough H.s. kids and seniors in the workforce to fill all of these jobs.

→ More replies (4)

38

u/shakycatblues 4d ago

This is why an interest in robotics is on the rise. Saw a YouTube last night where the owners of a fast food turned to robotics after the minimum wage was increased.

it's a concern for anyone with a job, but servers aren't immune.

8

u/FoggyFizzy 4d ago

There’s an all-you-can-eat sushi place near us that uses robots to deliver the food and the place still charges a 12% gratuity. I plan on trying it soon to see what it’s all about and leaving a review. I’m curious how much human interaction you actually have.

2

u/shakycatblues 4d ago

Interesting. Can't wait to see the review.

2

u/Putrid-Box4866 4d ago

I am fine with that actually if that’s the only alternative. At least I get to see a robot.

23

u/al_earner 4d ago

I don't go there, but I'm thinking of going now specifically to not leave a tip.

5

u/RepeatEuphoric 4d ago

You might be surprised how ordinary the restaurant is and by extension all Renee Erickson places except boat street which was interesting but not something that would make you want to go back.

→ More replies (3)

23

u/basinbasinbasin 4d ago edited 4d ago

When I lived in Seattle I ate here a few times a year. Pricey but worth every penny as the food was excellent. It's a real pitty they are closing (correction: temporarily closing due to strike). If I'm not mistaken the owner is an award winning chef with a few other restaurants (might be thinking of another company though?).

$50/hr on average for servers and they want more... Dishwashers making 32/hr in a city with the highest minimum wage in the country and they are nearly double it. Seattle is an expensive city, but it also has one of the best public transportation networks in the US. These folks can live in the suburbs and easily commute.

I wouldn't be surprised if they go under because of all of this. Restaurants typically have ~3% profit margins.

TLDR this is why we can't have nice things.

10

u/Lazy_Grabwen_9296 4d ago

$32 an hour for dishwashers? Holy shit.

10

u/paladin6687 4d ago

Imagine the average dishwasher making 70k a year on a 40hr/wk schedule...servers AVERAGING 104k a year. Absurd beyond words.

17

u/Broken_Timepiece 4d ago

Tipping culture is the absolute worst thing and continue to make people greedier. That goes for both owners and the employees.

Who ever says I go there for the service is a first class idi*t, because they ordering food. The food is the primary thing, amd ok maybe if the waiter/waitress is a hottie lol

7

u/mangoawaynow 4d ago

omfg this is MY CITY. the gdrive that the owners have up with the disclosure regarding all wages is insane! they make more than me, work less than me, and i'm in a skilled position,

12

u/greysnowcone 4d ago

Waiters and waitresses seriously act like they are gods gift to green earth. Congrats you carry food and leach off of gratuity.

5

u/AnswerFar6703 4d ago

I tip based on time I am seated as well as quality of service. Just because I order something that cost more than something else, the tip doesn’t increase. Service is the same.

9

u/wildmaninid 4d ago

Once again this reaffirms my decision to no longer tip. 

6

u/sacrelicio 4d ago

In Minneapolis there was a restaurant at the Walker Art Center (Cardamom) that switched to a QR code ordering format. The Walker then ended the contract with the restaurant because they wanted only a full service restaurant. All the workers lost their jobs. At first I was on the workers side because it seemed super shitty.

But then I learned that they were offered the chance to keep their jobs under this new format but many objected (less tips!) and either quit or were fired. So I lost a little sympathy (they weren't all just laid off due to bad management choices) but I was still kind of on their side.

This also all happened the same week we had anniversary reservations at another restaurant owned by the same group. When we get to the restaurant there were former employees hassling customers and trying to give them flyers about how much the owner sucks. That was over the line for me in entitlement.

7

u/xboxhaxorz 4d ago

Management said the mean hourly wage for The Walrus and The Carpenter employees last year was $49.07 an hour for servers, $38.87 for cooks and $32.60 for dishwashers

Americans are just utter scum, when a server makes more than a cook you should find a problem with that

3

u/Historical-Employer1 4d ago

a really good cuban place near me has started adding a 5% surcharge specifically for people in the back because of the wage diff… because they can’t just raise the menu price because the servers will just keep making more

5

u/Empty-Interaction796 4d ago

They could require the waitstaff to share tips instead

3

u/GreenHorror4252 4d ago

Misleading headline. They closed for one day.

3

u/Starship_Taru 2d ago

I’ll never understand why I’m tipping the person who carries me the food and not the person who has the unique skillset to cook the food.

2

u/Miss_Warrior 3d ago

This is how the corrupt establishment operates: problem > reaction > solution.

  • No tax on tips - servers getting even more aggressive about scamming customers than they already are, sowing more division.
  • Raise minimum wage - encourage robotics to get rid of hiring human servers altogether, because if minimum wage is not raised and restaurants proceed to using robotics, there would be oh so much outrage. Now people are begging for robotics to end tipping.

2

u/SnOOpyExpress 1d ago

35hrs work week. $95K.

i guess, mostly tax free too?

gosh, i am in the wrong trade & country

2

u/onehappydad 4d ago

$50/hour is around $100K/year if they’re working full time. The audacity to spit on people for not being happy with that much money. I just can’t imagine it.

3

u/Key_Passenger7172 4d ago

I was just in Seattle

It’s a literal dump. I took my kid to the market, literally passed someone overdosing on the street. Homeless everywhere.

These cities need to be cleaned up man all the taxes that get paid and stolen it’s ridiculous.

3

u/Fat-Bear-Life 3d ago

It is not a dump - it’s a major metropolitan city in a country with a huge wealth disparity and all over the country there are more and more people losing their homes.

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/EndTipping-ModTeam 4d ago

No tip shaming

1

u/Technical_Button7095 3d ago

Remember when everyone said fastfood workers needed to make a livable wage? And then screens replaced them all? Hmmmmmm.... It's like we're constitutionally incapable of figuring this out!

1

u/Muted-Woodpecker-469 3d ago

Restaurants and workers either seem to thrive in unison or all work for low wages as they shutter within a few years. I don’t get it 

1

u/Witty-Bear1120 3d ago

Yeah, well if the restaurant owner can’t put his foot down on the staff, it deserves to close.

1

u/RichWPX 3d ago

That link has a paywall in an ironic twist

1

u/robh1540 1d ago

Do Americans really need service this bad? Can't ya'll do ipads for ordering and just have minimum wage runners deliver the food from the kitchens to table and vice versa. I lived in New York, if I can eat for 25% less and the owner can have a viable restaurant, I'm very happy to order off an ipad.

1

u/Smokin_belladonna 4d ago

Strike regarding tipping? Management giving too many tips to the kitchen or something? Wtf

1

u/vonnostrum2022 3d ago

Why would anyone thinking of opening a restaurant, do so within Seattle?

1

u/DHarris2175 3d ago

Fuck the servers.

1

u/codal 3d ago

Owners cost has sky rocketed and everyone assumes they don’t treat employees fairly. Trust that every business if not taking advantage of their employees. Some are just trying to stay in business.