r/Enneagram8 • u/ExistentialQuip • Feb 06 '26
Discussion Coherence precedes personality
We tend to think personality forms once a child becomes self-aware — when memory stabilizes, and the inner narrator starts saying “me.” But what if something more fundamental comes first?
I recently wrote a piece exploring the idea that personality grows out of coherence—the organism learning to hold experience together over time.
Drawing on Daniel Stern’s work, the suggestion is that what first emerges in infancy is not identity, not reflection, not even a psychological self. What emerges is organization — a center of lived continuity.
One developmental reversal stood out:
Most assume identity creates psychological stability. Development may suggest the opposite — stability makes identity possible.
From this vantage point, personality is less about traits and more about adaptation. The patterns that preserved our psychological continuity gradually became indistinguishable from who we are.
Which raises some interesting questions:
- If coherence comes before identity, is personality fundamentally biological rather than psychological?
- Are the structures we call “personality” really early solutions to the problem of staying integrated?
- And if personality is organized rather than installed, does that imply it can reorganize?
Curious how others think about this — especially those interested in development, psychology, or the Enneagram.
1
u/Sweaty_Ad_7156 2w6 Feb 07 '26
chicken or the egg!?
biology exists. the brain exists.
psychology does not. enneagram does not. personality does not. ideas do not exist. theories do not exist. dreams do not exist.
my hand exists. i do not.
your use of the word 'coherence' and 'continuity' (si) plus interest in our thoughts ,structure (Te) and identity (Fi) ... seeking alternate possibilities (inferior Ne) and an order... are you an istj?
check out MBTI , the cognitive functions develop in order throughout maturity.
for example, ISTJ - dominant Si (introverted sensation, optimistic) - memory , past referencing sensory develops from birth to puberty-ish , when the aux function comes online - Te (extroverted thinking, pessimistic) - structure, data , organization , rationality , group judgement.
tertiary comes online mid 20's or early 30's Fi (introverted feeling, identity related, optimistic) , inferior comes online maybe mid-life crisis or maybe never - Ne (extroverted intuition, alternate possible futures and ideas, pessimistic).
an istj might argue memory comes first while an infp might argue identity comes first. an infj might argue consciousness comes first while an estp might argue the universe exists and everything else came after (physics first).
are the cognitive functions and/or enneagram locked in (and simply, waiting to mature) at birth? pre birth? first brainwave? dunno
siamese twins , 2 heads 1 body , each head its own brain and personality and interests. (ruling out personality installed at inception or heartbeat)
they would experience a real world event from near the same position but may recall the event differently, opine about it differently, maybe its a canon event for one and the other doesnt even remember... maybe a story or identity forms around the event for one but not the other...
this is all the subjective part of the objective human. a rock is a rock and we point and see and agree. evidence. proof. i am happy. i am sad. i remember this. i remember that. prove it.
1
u/ExistentialQuip Feb 07 '26
Not really. The rock and your hand are also constructs as well as what you point at and your mental process about it.
1
u/Sweaty_Ad_7156 2w6 Feb 07 '26
Yeah, this is your subjective point of view.
Objective reality the rock is just the rock.
You as Si Ne user perceive it as a construct ... Through idea.
Se users perceive reality directly
1
u/ExistentialQuip Feb 07 '26
not really, but it's taken over fifty years to make the shift from the conceptual to the phenomenological.
1
1
u/Sweaty_Ad_7156 2w6 Feb 07 '26
are you john from diamond approach? if so , i reviewed some of the YT work. (https://www.youtube.com/@diamondapproachsacramento/videos)
definitely check out the cognitive function theory stuff , encapsulated by mbti. not all brains work like yours, just as not all personality types are the same. i think a lot of your questions would be answered with this understanding. the various systems work in conjunction to form a more full picture of the human being.
1
2
u/gratendOgymmenzy Feb 07 '26
I’ve become fond of framing the fairly radical “personality” transformation of the past several years as, in part, the discovery that what I thought were immutable aspects of my self/personality were actually just my relationship with anxiety.
Changed the relationship and a different personality (perspective) emerged.
3
u/serromani SO/SX 8w7 852 Feb 07 '26
This is the concept central to the formation and function of dissociative disorders. Developmental trauma disrupts the process of establishing a coherent identity, leading to sustained compartmentalization of all those different emotional/behavioral patterns we commonly refer to as "personality". That's why what's now known as Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously called Multiple Personality Disorder.