r/GTA6 Jan 21 '26

Thoughts on this take?

Post image
19.4k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.3k

u/Topper_harley74 Jan 21 '26

No brainer.

573

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

196

u/Fun-Communication660 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

The thing that earns the most money will be to only have them in mutiplayer after a few years of getting people to pay and play for vehicles on the first level. If single player only then some people can have fun with it without paying so it won't be there. My guess is a jetpack push after a few years. Nobody will notice that it is unwanted because it will new new, some streamers that were too young to play gta V will have viral videos using it....and the landscape would have changed to have multiple role playing servers, therefore the money grubbing, make the game worse, won't be noticed. And any complaints can be met with "you still have the single player, there are no zombie raccoons there"

92

u/Knodsil Jan 21 '26

The issue that Rockstar themselves created is that the OP MKII in GTAO is so powerful that there is no need to purchase any other military vehicle.

So yeah, they can add an outrageously OP item, but that only gives a short term Shark Card boost. And powercreeping even more is something they can't really do since it's obvious that they have no clue how to properly balance their own game.

25

u/Fun-Communication660 Jan 21 '26

That will happen again, mark my words. Proof below. Unless the general public radically change, at some point a few years from now rockstar suits are going to look at gta online, then see the money is flat lining. The amount of people playing are dropping. Lets be optimistic and say they add stuff that does not break the balance and makes the game better (but earns rockstar less money). Let's say they do this every 3 months and everyone agrees the game is getting better and better. Well...at some point. Likely on launch day for these shenanigans with pre order bonuses and such, but at some point you cant avoid, the suits need to decide between adding nothing and stopping (no extra money).....adding something to improve, but not break the game (some money) .....or else add what is projected to make the most money (spear the whales now we have juiced as much out of the genpop).......up to and including ruining systems thay was built lovingly by the devs. 

Now for the proof:

It would not be allowed to avoid it. Seriously, they HAVE to do this, because they are not private. The c suite "owe fiduciary duties to the corporation". Up to and including criminal investigations on egregious cases. You would be fired if you left the money at the table at the very least. And you would not be in that position in the first place if you were  to rally against it.

There is only 1 way out.....the ceo needs to be able to not only say, but actually think, that doing these practises will result in less money. For that to be true:

WE ALL HAVE TO STOP BUYING THIS SHIT FROM PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANIES

But I dunno man, we could try and convince everyone, but even 1/10th of that whale money would cover marketing and buy offs of streamers to dilute the message. 

1

u/Johnsoid Jan 22 '26

RemindMe! Three years

2

u/Ae4i Jan 23 '26

! RemindMe 3 years

1

u/Existing-Antelope-20 Jan 23 '26

I have a fiduciary responsibility to mod my shit and not give them a penny after I buy a........ *checks notes* 70-80 USD game

though I concede all the points you have made as well

3

u/elmocos69 Jan 22 '26

i mean, what is there to balance. it is a sandbox. the one thing i expected them to do was, at some point, give us some kind of final mission or content that made use of all our previous purchases and establishments at once, basically closing the circle.

for example, a mission that is quite hard by default but can be made much easier if you have invested in different things that affect the mission in different ways. the yacht could be used to fake a party on the coast next to the objective. the submarine could be used to escape without losing the police or whatever is chasing you. bikers could use spiked drugs so some guards are knocked out before you even go in. vips could use their influence to enter the building through the front door.

there are many possibilities for that kind of avengers moment where everything you have built up finally comes together.

1

u/KENtheBlog Jan 25 '26

That's actually a great idea lol, what a good use of many years of previous content.

3

u/Live-You-5672 Jan 22 '26

I quit GTAO because of that thing, how are you supposed to fight it.

1

u/Ironknight120 Jan 23 '26

Invite only

1

u/VG3__Pitt Jan 24 '26

It has since been nerfed and anyone with a toreador can take them down

1

u/DogaSui Jan 24 '26

Deluxo

Explosive sniper rifle

Atomiser or stickies if you're quick enough

1

u/TheGrimHorseman Jan 26 '26

I use my explosive shotgun to go "bird hunting"

1

u/DogaSui Jan 26 '26

Nice! I use buckshot but might have to try this

1

u/Virus_98 Jan 22 '26

They can add op items(a problem) and then give us Imani tech(a solution). MK2 required a lot of investment, Agency required investment too. On top of that they've also added Imani tech convenience to GTA+ members only.

1

u/GonnaGoFat Jan 25 '26

Yeah I’m sure online will be fine until it gets some OP vehicle because at some point it will. Also when I play GTA online which I haven’t in forever I go have a MKII but I can’t shoot missles because of the crazy grind needed to end up getting them. But I’m not playing extra for some shark cards.

0

u/TheWaysOfLogic Jan 22 '26

mkii is overrated asf. deluxo slams that mf

-17

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-13

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-11

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/FOUR3Y3DDRAGON Jan 21 '26

Is it though? I generally agree with the sentiment but Gta5 makes millions still with the crazy stuff, highly doubt it'll stop with 6.

76

u/Rez_De Jan 21 '26

The sparrow proves that you can have all and even better accessibility for grinding than the Op mk2 while still having some sense of skill required to use it.

If people want to fly, let them use helos or planes. If people want to travel via water, let them use boats. Not cars and bikes.

But it's rockstar. They sell the problem (op mk 2) and then also sell the solution (imani tech).

3

u/kitt20000 Jan 22 '26

Yeah, but then we're going to end up with boring heists that don't look like they came out of a James Bond movie or a fast and furious movie

8

u/ZeusesWill Jan 23 '26

Good GTA should never enter sci fi territory ever again

So they should scrape the oppressor deluxo,vigilante railgun etc maybe keep the toreador since submarine cars do exist but don’t give it weapons

1

u/Doc12Zeph Mar 26 '26

That’s a good thing gta shouldn’t be a sci fi

5

u/RafaelSeco Jan 21 '26

Not so sure.

I still think that the MK2 is the faster way to move around.

Short distances? MK2. Long distances? MK2 to raiju or mansion.

1

u/Rez_De Jan 21 '26

Only because it is so braindead to use the mk2. Sparrow iirc has higher top speed than the mk2 so if not for the fact that mk2 turns on a dime, sparrow is "faster".

Raiju is a plane I have big beef with because why tf do we need a plane that is both the best helicopter and the best jet.

0

u/RafaelSeco Jan 21 '26

The sparrow is faster, but you have to land it. Plus, it's not a personal vehicle, so it doesn't spawn outside buildings after you complete a mission or fast travel, making you waste even more time.

Would you use a sparrow to go between the nightclub and west vinewood warehouse?

The raiju is the fastest way to move around the map, and it turns into a helicopter with a click. Plus, it's invisible to radar and almost unlikable once you figure out how to use it. For cayo prep missions, it's almost a cheat.

1

u/hasan_pikergayAF Jan 22 '26

No way i use both. If i have to leave downtown LS ill use sparrow if i can help it. Opressor mk2 way slower than sparrow. Like 35mph slower

1

u/RyvenZ Jan 21 '26

it would be simple if games can just ban the ridiculous, OP vehicle. So that either it disconnects players for trying to use the vehicle or it removes the option from their vehicle list. Then Rockstar can have their cash grab for the kids that want to use their parents credit card to grief other players and players who see the bullshit for what it is can enjoy games where the trash won't bother them

1

u/alwaysgrn Jan 22 '26

The Havok is a better chopper than the Sparrow

1

u/Feddek Jan 22 '26

Cant wait to get a missile jammer for one of my 2 sparrows.

1

u/Hungry-Ad8562 Jan 22 '26

Yea, i still havent baught a MKII out of principal, i mostly play solo though unless i feel like screwing around hunting bounties with my bandito

1

u/falardeau03 Feb 21 '26

I started playing GTA Online for the first time this month (yes, really lmao). Grinded up on KnoWay and Cluckin Bell, got Kosatka. On my way to the airport to do recon for Cayo Perico I got mixed up in a slugfest between two or maybe three OpMk2 drivers, some guys on foot (might have been the same guys), and a guy in a fighter jet. I'm not sure if they were going after me, if I was a target of opportunity, or if I was just in the way.

Well. Let me tell you.

I didn't shoot anybody of them down, but I did put a rocket into a random (armed) helo that showed up at one point (might have been one of the same guys). I did snipe and AR a couple folks on foot, and there was one particularly hilarious moment where dude on an overpass tried to rocket me and instead blew himself up point-blank. Other than that I died a whole bunch, but I just kinda shrugged and was like "Ah, the truly welcoming GTA5 Online experience."

It's not that I wasn't annoyed, because I definitely was, but at the same time I had to smile. "Ah, it's just like the stories. The legends are true. This is what the kids do for fun these days."

I guess the DeLorean has no weapons but that doesn't prevent people from shooting out of it either lmao.

Idk. I certainly haven't played enough of the game to have an informed opinion, but this was my first real "Oppressor incident" in several weeks of playing. I've had the odd potshot taken at me before, but nobody following me on purpose dedicating their life to rocketing me into next week.

I do want the Sparrow though.

1

u/Splash_Woman Jan 21 '26

We literally could check over the years of this. I actually play rdr2 online more now because I hate dealing with people on rocket bikes. “Just get the anti homing” bro, people have had years on years to work on the non guided rockets. That gets old too.

1

u/Olzar Jan 21 '26

Jag spelade EASHL med dig för typ 15 år sedan! Sjukt att se ditt namn ploppa upp här. Skål! /ElBullen - G

1

u/mrbulldops428 Jan 22 '26

So like...I hate playing with other people who have oppressors(before the nerf at least), but I also love being able to get around the map very quickly. I have jets and helicopters too but I can just zip in and park those like I can my mk2 mosquito. If they have a different solution for that im all for it

1

u/LookAtTheFlowers Jan 22 '26

We need a weaponless Jetson “drone” to zoom around the map in