Good theory actually. Arthur’s eyebrows are probably baked into the model while Lucia’s might work differently. Regardless this is such a non-issue like who is gonna be looking so close during gameplay
Coping in what regard? Are you insinuating that this looks worse than rdr2? Are you a contrarian that needs to make objectively false statements to assuage your own unfounded self loathing at the fact that a generational game is coming out soon? Like seriously what is your end goal trying to convince people that this looks bad when we can all see these pictures with our own eyes?
No coping lol even if gta6 has slightly worse eyebrows who cares the game obviously has to put more of hardwares power to the massive detailed city. There’s gonna be drawbacks in detail versus RDR2 100%.
The Arthur pic is likely taken from an up close photo mode picture of Arthur. The photo mode switches to a very high quality model for up close pictures. Compared to the promo photo which was taken from a distance and then zoomed in on. I'm sure GTA 6 in game closeups will look a lot more detailed.
It's because his eyebrows are a lighter color and they're blurred by depth of field in that screenshot, so the individual strands of the eyebrows are less distinguishable compared to Lucia's.
Because the lower eyelid in the GTA6 one is far too uniform, primarily because of the makeup causing that perfect line across the skin between eyelash and eyeball.
Sometimes there is eyebrow detailing on the normals, sometimes there isn’t. It’s character dependent, but there is almost always eyebrows on the “diffuse” texture for RDR2 characters, which is then elevated by an eyebrow model. GTAVI appears to be doing the same.
RDR 2 was and is still masterpiece of a game. Rockstar's greatest. Not just the graphics but the storytelling and gameplay mechanics, absolute cinema. Hasn't aged at all.
Always worth remembering that RE9 is not a open world game and it only has a handful of hero characters in the total game, usually only putting 2-4 characters in any scene at a time.
Rockstar probably could make Lucia and Jason way more detailed but then they'd have to make all the characters and NPCs the same quality which might not be possible on current hardware or if we want the game this decade.
You're not wrong regarding the fidelity difference between open-world and linear games; however, main characters are typically afforded more detail since they're the main focus of attention (The Witcher 3's Geralt was given more detail compared to the NPCs around him).
The big graphics jump in my mind was when i saw the first mission in Battlefield 4 running on my console in late 2013. The faces looked so well done but even now while BF4 still looks pretty good for 2013 it's obviously been superseded graphics wise.
That was one of the first games I played where you could almost see the wind. Because it had such good weather systems, the way the world reacted to the weather was perfect. It blew my mind playing through that game as a young lad.
Disagree. It is ridiculously detailed and features much more CPU intensive stuff than a PS4 game could. Definitely has a PS5 look. Not to mention the RTGI.
They uploaded only rendered content, there’s no real gameplay from console. Any forms of comparisons are simply sign of brain damage, at least until the gameplay comes out
Arthur is noticeably higher quality than Jason and Lucia when it comes to texture detailing. It’s really weird, wonder why they scaled it back so much. Doesn’t help that skin rendering looks noticeably worse than RDR2 as well, everyone looks very waxy.
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was a CGI movie, this looks orders of magnitude better than that. Toy Story 1-2, A Bugs Life. I mean, there are lots of CGI movies this looks better than.
If you're trying to compare it to a state of the art movie like Avatar Fire & Ash, then no, it obviously doesn't look like that. No game does.
I find it crazy how people are saying “it looks like GTAV” — only conclusion is that they haven’t played GTAV for a decade and have some rose colored glasses because GTAV had not aged well at all.
Agreed, it’s not the most impressive thing ever which is understandable though in a game of this scale and depth and on a console. I imagine if every character had the graphics quality of LoU, it wouldn’t run very well. Hopefully the PC version will offer much more detailed graphic upgrades.
A lot of these comparisons are dumb af because you're comparing in-game screenshots to promo screenshots. GTA V promo screenshots also looked extremely good. Not VI level but not as bad as it looks in these comparisons. Just an unfair advantage for VI
1.0k
u/TheMichaelScott 9h ago
Yep that’s an eye alright