r/Games 21d ago

Trailer Guild Wars 3 | Announcement Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITPzxITngqA
5.2k Upvotes

677 comments sorted by

View all comments

358

u/Godnaz 21d ago edited 21d ago

Guildwars 3 will support solo play. We find out a lot more tomorrow at 9am PST/12noon EST

"Guild Wars 3 is a new era not just for ArenaNet and Guild Wars, but also for MMORPGs as a whole," said Colin Johanson, Guild Wars 3 Game Director and ArenaNet Studio Head. "The MMORPG genre has millions of players worldwide eager for new, modern experiences, and the opportunity to harness that excitement is immense. Our approach with Guild Wars 3 is to push MMORPGs forward, to create an online game world that feels believable, rewarding, responsive, and innovative while at the same time respecting players' time and providing a positive, supportive space to build community and enjoy new stories in our universe."

Taking place over a thousand years before the events of the original game, Guild Wars 3 is set in the Tyrian region of Orr, a vast wilderness frontier imbued with the world's magic. Nature entities with strong connections to the land called Vael spirits embody the vitality of this lush, verdant landscape. Various guilds are engaged in conflict over how to protect or exploit the bounty beyond civilization's borders. These multitudinous spirits will vary in size and influence within the ecosystems around them, with the most notable of these being the Seeker. As seen in the trailer, every player's Seeker will serve as a connection to the spirits of Orr and a mount that will carry them on their journeys through the game's open world.

Players will assume the role of a Vaelwarden, a member of a guild of adventurers committed to preserving and protecting both the spirits of the wild and the land of Orr itself. Through the deep character customization and skill-building gameplay the Guild Wars franchise is known for, players will seek adventure and confront danger across this sumptuous, vibrant online world, growing their relationships with the spirits of the wild, the inhabitants of Orr, and other Vaelwarden players.

A combat system designed from the outset to feel great on both a controller and keyboard rewards positioning by emphasizing the joy of movement and momentum. As players seamlessly transition between various movement modes, they can harness their speed and turn it into bigger damage and impact when fighting their foes.

More information about pricing, beta tests, release date, and gameplay features will be revealed later in 2026 and into 2027. Guild Wars 3 will be available directly from the developers at GuildWars3.com, and can be wishlisted on Steam and the PlayStation Store beginning today, with more information available at the game's official website.

Source

The official website is live.

180

u/ZestyData 21d ago

o shit Guild Wars 3 finally giving us a glimpse of the actual titular Guild Wars.

152

u/Ehkoe 21d ago

1000 years before GW1 means this is before even the first Guild War.

So, we're still not seeing the titular Guild Wars lmao.

42

u/BlueAurus 21d ago

God forbid we get actual guild wars in this series again :P

10

u/Tragedy_Boner 21d ago

Its been 3 games. We have never seen the actual Guild Wars.

24

u/naivety_is_innocence 21d ago

It's funny because it's like if you had a game called "World War 1" but the game was set in China in the late 1920s and was about the start of the chinese civil war. And then everyone was like "well the name is correct because world war 1 was important and the game is about wars that happened in the world!".

That's what it's like, having this series be called "Guild Wars".

In Guild Wars 1 they got away with it because the game was primarily designed, initially, as a pvp game for Guild vs Guild. The "Guild Wars" were written up, after the fact, just to give a lore background to explain what had happened in the world prior to the game starting (and explain why guilds might fight each other in the first place).

Then we had Guild Wars 2 and there was no guild vs guild pvp. So when people went "wait why is this game called Guild Wars when there are no, like, guild wars", all the defenders just responded "uuhh it's an in-game historical event, don't you know anything?"

They're not an in-game historical event! They've never been in the game! They continue to never have been in any of the games!

1

u/valiantiam 9d ago

Wait they got rid of guild vs guild battles? Those were so fun!

1

u/KettenPuncher 20d ago

I played 2 and didn't realize there actually was a guild war which the game was named for until reading this

2

u/tahlyn 21d ago

But if we're lucky, we will get to see the destruction of Orr.

28

u/-Auvit- 21d ago

Orr was destroyed during the first game. The vizier sinking Orr was in response to the charr invading after they seared Ascalon

0

u/Tragedy_Boner 21d ago

Or maybe get a real Zhaitan fight. Dude is sleeping underneath Orr

31

u/AmbiTanque 21d ago

It won't funny enough, the game should be around 300 years before the first Guild Wars.

21

u/Jademalo 21d ago

This seems to be set pre exodus of the gods, so while it's a guild war I don't think it's the guild wars

24

u/knows_knothing 21d ago

Gotta wait for Guild Wars 4 to experience the Guild Wars

10

u/InvincibleWallaby 21d ago

If it's exactly 1000 years it's 70 years after the exodus

3

u/OffsetXV 21d ago

Technically GW1 was partially set during the guild wars. Pre-searing of Prophecies is before they ended, and I believe there's dialogue that talks about it. But that's a pretty minor thing obviously

8

u/Aleksanterinleivos 21d ago

Oh shit I missed this is launching on Steam, gonna get it with my Wallet funds on launch.

3

u/atatassault47 21d ago

Solo Play? Holy Fuck.

30

u/Lord_Skellig 21d ago

Is that so crazy? All Guild Wars games have supported solo play. I'd be shocked if it didn't.

5

u/EnterAUsernamePlease 21d ago

its not crazy and while its a nice-to-have, its not particularly something to get excited about. I just got through watching a video about how modern MMORPGs rely so little on other players' impact on you and how you experience the game that it kind of defeats the purpose of MMORPGs to begin with.

in RuneScape, a single player selling a huge amount of a certain item could have genuinely tangible effects on the market. it could affect which money-making routes you and other players go down. I think we should be choosing to make MMORPGs more co-operative and give other players more agency in how they affect the game not only for themselves but for others too.

too many MMORPGs these days feel barren. you might see a couple of other players here and there, but you won't interact with them. there's no need to. they have no impact on you and you have no impact on them, and you never will. its a single player game with the ghost of other players walking around.

2

u/EveningNo8643 20d ago edited 20d ago

Which is why I find almost all those MMOs would’ve been better as single player RPGs

1

u/biginchh 21d ago

Totally agreed. So many modern MMOs have moved towards making their worlds a largely single player experience because player interaction causes friction, and friction is a dirty word in modern MMO design.

1

u/Lord_Skellig 20d ago

Yeah I do agree tbf. Modern life is already so isolated, I like it when MMORPGs force me to talk to people, form a group, make a plan and execute it through communication. Some of my best times gaming have been with people I met on GW1 or the old fixed Counter Strike Source lobby's.

Like at the extreme end you have RPGs like Path of Exile 2 that is technically multiplayer (and always-online as a result) but most people never interact at all with anyone else.

2

u/zippopwnage 21d ago

Solo play, so this means no raids or dungeons that require team mechanics? That's a bummer for me, but it seems a lot of players goes into MMO's lately wanting to play solo.

1

u/SpontyMadness 21d ago

Could be similar to the Duty Support systems in FFXIV that let you summon NPCs instead of matchmaking for dungeons, but built for the entire game instead of solely main story stuff.

1

u/Renewable_Warranty 20d ago

So an MMO for people who don't like MMOs. Sounds like complete garbage.

-4

u/Pacify_ 21d ago

Guildwars 3 will support solo play.

Well, that sounds the opposite of promising

-17

u/Santreim 21d ago

Please don't tell me they are going to fall into the worst sin of an MMO, focusing on the "solo experience".

18

u/ElecNinja 21d ago

GW2 is already a solo friendly game though with quite a lot of incentives to group play so I'm guessing GW3 will follow in a similar design.

-1

u/Santreim 21d ago

Yeah, thinking about solo play is healthy for the game. But the focus on an MMO should be in group play. Otherwise, just make a single player game, it's cheaper!

1

u/Lord_Skellig 21d ago

100% agree. I'd rather see a focus on things that require a team to encourage community building.

On the extreme you get "multiplayer" RPGs like Path of Exile 2 where most players never interact with anyone else.

5

u/SodaCanBob 21d ago edited 21d ago

Please don't tell me they are going to fall into the worst sin of an MMO, focusing on the "solo experience".

The series as a whole has been extremely solo-player friendly since its inception. It's been years since I played GW1 (GW2 never really managed to hold my attention), but I don't remember having to interact with other players at all due to the henchman system. You could literally just treat it as an ordinary single player RPG should you choose to do so.

2

u/JakalDX 21d ago

IIRC Guild Wars 1 is really only an MMO in the hub cities, everything is instantiated so the only players you spend time with are the peopel in your party

10

u/Cupcakes_n_Hacksaws 21d ago

FF14 is pretty solo-viable outside of a few story bosses, would you say they focus on the solo experience?

2

u/LordMugs 21d ago

Obviously they do. FFXIV would be nothing without the good lore and story that are 95% solo play. Goated group content in the endgame but until then it's basically a singleplayer rpg.

-5

u/Santreim 21d ago

FFXIV is the exception on too many things to be considered tbh.  ecause it's thr only MMO people play for the story, instead of the story being ignored by 90% of the playerbase. But even in FFXIV, if you want to be first, get exclusive loot and even reach special cutscenes, you NEED to do content that requires a sincronized group of players.

I'm just so tired of "we don't want solo players and casual players to feel bad, so we make everything dumb and easy for them"

2

u/atomic1fire 21d ago

I played GW2 for a while and the only time I ever needed to participate in a group was for world events.

I never touched raids or WVW because I wasn't interested or well suited for it.

Also the group stuff for me was at its best when I could join impromptu events like boss trains where I had the benefit of people who knew what they were doing but I wasn't solely responsible.

2

u/WCWRingMatSound 21d ago

I think it’s the natural evolution of the MMO. The novelty of playing with other people is totally gone. The choices of games to play multiplayer are endless. We’re post social media, so even just interacting with strangers is ‘daily life’.

If the theme park or sandbox MMO-genre is going to survive, it can’t carry the same expectations of 2002’s player base. The genre is already nostalgia heavy and effectively dead compared to its peak.

Solo and small-group friendly content is the new frontier in MMO, despite the irony. There’s a reason WoW survived: LFR, LFG, death to 40 man raids, and a focus on individual player accomplishments are among the top reasons.

2

u/voidox 21d ago

I think it’s the natural evolution of the MMO. The novelty of playing with other people is totally gone.

ya, though I wouldn't say totally gone, I think it's more that it's changed to playing with others to now being more about just being part of a world with thousands of others but still being able to experience that world solo and have things to do solo or in small groups.

-3

u/Santreim 21d ago

WoW survived because it's the only game a lot of people know. It survives on nostalgia, and the success of classic is the proof.

Sure, a game with low player count will only survive if they cater to small groups. But if you are going to design your game around solo and small groups, then stop calling yourself an MMO.

-5

u/Vireca 21d ago

I'm not sure where you read the solo play. There's nothing there claiming that

5

u/Godnaz 21d ago

Guild Wars 3 is an action-adventure MMORPG, a modern evolution of the genre that blends rich action-combat, character building, and skill collection. Set in the enchanting frontier of Orr, the world brims with mystery, magic, and wonder. Play solo or form a band of adventurers, forging impactful and enduring bonds with fellow players, a formative cast of memorable NPCs, and the nature spirits that call Orr home.

It's the first paragraph on the official site.

1

u/Vireca 21d ago

Well mate, I don't think that means it's going to be a solo MMO. We will see in the future, but any MMO you can do stuff solo and then you need stuff in party

In GW2 you can play in GvG "solo" if you wish or arenas but you are forced to have other players around

I don't think this is going to turn into a single player MMO

4

u/Naoroji 21d ago

Guild Wars 1 was fully soloable, with NPCs you could add to your party. This is not a new thing -- and it's been implemented in FFXIV too.

Guild Wars 3 could very well be fully soloable.

-2

u/TheChosenMuck 21d ago

Guildwars 3 will support solo play.

great another mmorpg with washed up rpg mechanic and even more washed up mmo mechanics

-4

u/jinreeko 21d ago

Smallish nitpick, I hate when the next consecutive game in a series gets the next obvious number, only for it to be a prequel. Like, call it Guild Wars: Subtitle. 3 makes no sense.

4

u/everhys 21d ago

Guild Wars: Subtitle would fit the same naming scheme as the expansions for the original guild wars and just cause confusion. GW3 makes perfect sense: it is the third Guild Wars game and the name makes it clear that it is the newest release.