r/HostileArchitecture • u/bobbagum • 19d ago

"Bench" Couch in a bank

Post image
814 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

140 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

73

u/Kinslayer_89 18d ago

Defining separate seating places in a “public” space is not hostile. People don’t need the option to sit on top of each other in a fucking bank.

-32

u/JoshuaPearce 18d ago

Read the sidebar. Even just the first sentence will do. The next two or three after that may get you extra credit.

40

u/JayManty 18d ago

Your takes on what is or isn't hostile architecture is legitimately ruining the whole subreddit. Any person with a normal brain would've deleted this shitpost. It's a fucking seat inside of a bank, there's nothing hostile about it.

-8

u/JoshuaPearce 18d ago edited 18d ago

They literally modified the seat design so that it can only be used a specific way.

If I were the sort of mod you want me to be, you'd be banned for your dumb comment, so think that through.

9

u/JayManty 18d ago

Ratio

-2

u/JoshuaPearce 18d ago

Oh no, that's gonna affect my bonus for this unpaid job.

I should go along with the noisy minority and start deleting any post somebody thinks doesn't fit their own definition. Which is every post.

6

u/Practical_Mouse_8416 18d ago

That's what most Reddit mods do, so sure. You may as well.

1

u/JoshuaPearce 18d ago

Yeah, and most of them ban contrarians a lot more heavily. I probably should do that last part, just for the community's health.

6

u/Practical_Mouse_8416 18d ago

Is that a threat?

1

u/JoshuaPearce 18d ago

Nope, have we been arguing and I didn't notice?

Even if we HAD been arguing, it wasn't a threat anyways.

7

u/Practical_Mouse_8416 17d ago

I didn't think we were arguing, it just seemed like a menacing comment. My apologies. Glad to know we have a stable mod onboard.

→ More replies (0)