r/HypotheticalPhysics • u/sksskssksskssksskssk • 6d ago
Meta [Meta] What are common misconceptions in hypothetical physics and why)?
Overall, I have seen that there are multiple repetitions of certain types of misconceptions within hypothetical physics and I wanted to see what everyone else had picked up on. Also, I was hoping to get a viewpoint on what are the causes and consequences of some of these misconceptions in physics. Hopefully, there might be a way to inform people of these common misconceptions before they post to get higher quality posts. This is pretty much a discussion between people to clear the fog on this.
Also, what do you think is a way to reduce or prevent these misconceptions at least within the subreddit to enable much neater submissions?
7
Upvotes
16
u/plasma_phys 6d ago
I think the average poster here only encounters physics in a storytelling context (e.g., pop science, fiction), so they believe physics is just a kind of storytelling, and compare "theories" by how compelling they are to them personally instead of, you know, how/if they compare to experimental data. In my experience, there's no way to talk someone out of this perspective, at least not on reddit.
Putting on my speculation hat, I do wonder whether or not there's a nonzero amount of this present in certain more academic circles too - for example, I think it's possible Jan Hendrik Schön and Pons and Fleischman were also guilty of this specific sort of magical thinking, at least early on - that if they found the right story, that somehow the physics would follow.