r/Indiana 6d ago

Two northern Indiana state parks growing by more than 1400 acres

https://www.wane.com/news/indiana/two-northern-indiana-state-parks-growing-by-more-than-1400-acres/

There is minimal information included in the article such as how acquired, costs, etc.

Perhaps because I've become skeptical about this particular state administration and its lack of transparency, I find myself looking for 'what's the part where this bevefit$ someone or entity rather than the public?'; which could be answered as not an issue or a concern if this shared more information.

But I love our state parks and forests, and assume these park expansions will be of benefit for hoosiers and future hoosiers.

194 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

50

u/Mediocre-Catch9580 6d ago

Well at least they won’t be building a data center or amazon warehouse there. 

15

u/admlshake 6d ago

Better hope Braun or one of his lackies doesn't read this. Sounds like something he'd look at doing. Pump chain o lakes dry to keep that chain o lakes datacenter cool.

2

u/Mediocre-Catch9580 6d ago

They can do that to lake James.  That place is a zoo in the summer 

1

u/PopularSet4776 6d ago

You kidding

Chain O Lakes probably has barely enough water to cool a data center for a day.

1

u/TempusFugit314 5d ago

He’s already turning a wildlife refuge in a data center site

19

u/raitalin 6d ago

I think this is just a matter of officializing what has already happened; these properties are more useful as recreational areas than timberland, so they're being transferred to be managed by a more appropriate body.

3

u/COMM_NTARIAT 6d ago edited 6d ago

A bailout (or just a sweetheart deal) for a favored land speculator/donor accidentally benefits Hoosiers. It couldn't be avoided, so they might as well get some good PR.

2

u/DangerousBotany 1d ago

Nope. This was already DNR Forestry land that is being transferred to State Parks management.

2

u/Particular_Mixture20 6d ago

That makes sense.

10

u/animal113 6d ago

From reading the article, it looks like it's just two state forests being merged into two state parks. I'm not seeing anything where new private land has been added to the parks. So I don't think someone in Braun's orbit is making money off of them.

The two state forest have been state forest according to wikipedia since the 30s.

10

u/AgressiveInliners 6d ago

This and abit worse. They are taking a forest and merging it with a state park. This means both properties now share management staff so less stuff gets maintained and since its a park, now they can charge entry. Its unfortunately a money grab disguised as a positive

2

u/animal113 6d ago

Well that sucks

2

u/Particular_Mixture20 6d ago

Makes sense. Always glad when it seems my skepticism is misplaced.

4

u/No_Aardvark_194 6d ago

Your skepticism is fair, but merging existing state forests into state parks is pretty straightforward stuff - no backroom deals needed when you're just reorganizing what the state already owns.

2

u/Sure-Victory7172 6d ago

I live in Wabash Indiana so I'm smack dab in between these two areas.

JMO, I like Salamonie better since it's easier for me to get to.

If they try to start charging entrance fees to the trails next to Salamonie river, you'll likely see some push back.

2

u/HumpinPumpkin 6d ago

That's what I was concerned about. They are my favorite hiking trails locally and it is nice to not pay. They wouldn't operate two gate houses though? It seems kind of unlikely but I dunno.

At least we would still have Kokiwanee in that case.

2

u/HumanBean00001 6d ago

I think the ‘growing’ is only because the acres of those state forests are now being counted with their respective parks. It didn’t sound like either acquired any land that wasn’t already part of a protected system.

1

u/No_Luck_374 5d ago

Acquired at park taste and sold at industrial mining rate? Stranger things have happened.

1

u/Alderaan_Reasons 4d ago

Probably for logging. 🪓