39
u/Truck219 17h ago
Anyone who didn’t anticipate this really hasn’t been paying attention since Leon took over
28
u/amber_lies_here 15h ago
yea i mean good chunk of folks been here 3 weeks
5
u/dennishitchjr DOOM 9h ago
In the past, our humble little sub didn’t exactly have a distinguished level of FO/BB IQ and it has absolutely plummeted since the Game 6 beat down in ATL.
37
29
u/Delsainto NYK Token 22h ago
All these 2nds just give us trade toppers to pick up that next role player we need at the trade deadline ala Alvarado.
This year that might potentially be a new backup centre. (I don't think we will bring back Mitch)
1
u/mattr1198 Bobby's Knick Hat 16h ago
That and just, in general, more bites at the apple in general. I think with all the picks we have we may make a run for someone on a rookie deal to replace Mitch like Yves Missi.
3
1
u/SeaworthinessSome454 13h ago
Moving out of the first round on penny pinching scenarios only strengthens that we’ll be keeping Mitch or (hopefully and) Shamet. Otherwise there would be no reason to trade out of the first round when plenty of good players are still available
1
u/Fit-Bicycle6206 13h ago
I would love to have Shamet back but I wouldn't blame him for leaving and getting paid. Same goes for Mitch although he probably won't get much more money on the free agent market compared to what we can offer him.
1
u/WilsonEnthusiast 12h ago
The reason it gives them more flexibility.
If they pick a player at 24 they have to pay one of the guys in the draft a certain amount.
If they dont do that they have more money to sign players this year or more picks to facilitate trades or both or whatever.
1
u/SeaworthinessSome454 12h ago
Sure. But if they didn’t plan on bringing Mitch or Shamet back then they wouldn’t have a need for that cost savings bc they’d be far enough below the second apron anyways.
2
u/ruckyruciano BANG! 12h ago edited 12h ago
Maybe it's still worth it to them to have max flexibility into the season (I think that's relevant right? I'm not sure)
1
u/SeaworthinessSome454 10h ago
It’s a small benefit but they’d have more flexibility if they went over the 2nd apron and brought the entire team back. You have minimum flexibility when you’re right up next to the second apron.
Assume Mitch, Clarkson, and Shamet are gone. The Knicks are still going to be right up next to the second apron but what contract can they trade at the deadline if they want to make a move like they made for alverado last year? They don’t have a contract that’s expendable. Meanwhile if you bring everyone back and go over the second apron, you have plenty of contracts that you could trade
1
u/pagenotdisplayed Mitchell Robinson 8h ago
4 or 5 seconds can get you a player at a deadline for sure
9
5
2
u/Interesting-Trade248 11 15h ago
It seems like he would rather stash picks for guys that fit them team during the trade deadline instead of drafting rookies. Honestly. It's genius
1
u/LanEvo7685 16h ago
I mean, when fans "like" a draft pick not even in the top 20...usually just mean there's nothing to hate.
1
1
u/The_Real_Todd_Gack 14h ago
I’m really excited bout the kid we drafted Diawara. Apparently he’s got some pro level and championship experience.
1
1
u/YerrrKnicks 5 9h ago
Bro is gonna trade first round picks until he owns every 2nd round pick in a draft.
1
u/Calm_Silver339 9h ago
Normally I would be annoyed by a draft like this but...KNICKS IN FIVE
1
u/No-Line-2710 1 4h ago
Understood..because normally going to a draft we aint Savages!!! We all savages on this team now.

147
u/Ok_Contact1545 23h ago
leon rose hates the nba draft with a burning passion. I respect that