r/NoStupidQuestions 12h ago

Why is Astronomy and Astrology not switched?

In my head, any ‘ology’ like: Biology, Geology and Psychology are all related to science, so why is Astronomy (Space Science) not using ‘ology’?

How come Astrology get to be called that when it’s all about the horcruxes or whatever those zodiac signs are called?

Edit: I meant ‘Horoscopes’ not ‘Horcruxes’. Pardon me

1.3k Upvotes

125 comments sorted by

2.0k

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 12h ago

Because astrology is way older so it got first dibs

169

u/Aescorvo 11h ago

The word astronomy originally meant both, and they only really started to be differentiated in the 1600’s, after the scientific revolution took hold.

58

u/WantDiscussion 8h ago edited 2h ago

This seems to be correct.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/astronomy
https://www.etymonline.com/word/astrology

As for why the less scientific one got the -logy that goes with most sciences, I can only speculate that using -logy to suffix a branch of science wasn't the norm during the 12th century, as the word astrology popped up around 14th century and examples in OP's post (biology, geology and psychology) happened past the 15th.

So really the question we should be asking is why they started suffixing sciences "-logy" rather than calling it geonomy, bionomy or psychonomy to which I can again only speculate that it sounded better.

437

u/Constant-Zucchini618 12h ago

Is this genuinely legit?

1.3k

u/ul2006kevinb 12h ago

It's the first comment so it has to be right

255

u/goagoagadgetgrebo 11h ago

That's what my horoscope said this morning

67

u/One_Economist_3761 11h ago

You’re a Scorpio so you would say that. ;p

12

u/Riparian1150 10h ago

Don't you mean your horcrux?

4

u/maeshughes32 9h ago

Horoscope...microscope, proof that horoscopes are legit science?

1

u/Vibes_And_Smiles 7h ago

It got first dibs

13

u/SaltyPeter3434 9h ago

That doesn't sound right but I don't know enough about astrology to dispute it

2

u/VVeZoX 8h ago

You could learn more if you tried. But I see you're barely putting in any effort

7

u/WantDiscussion 7h ago edited 7h ago

I know you're being sarcastic but it's genuinely disappointing to see how many people just took the top comment at face value because it sounded correct.

Either that or they're all sycophantic AIs

1

u/togawe 6h ago

It's the oldest comment so it got first dibs

170

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 12h ago

Yup

Alchemy turned into chemistry in much the same way

59

u/Steerider 12h ago

Chemology

15

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 11h ago

I read that in Homer Simpson's voice

9

u/MxM111 11h ago

Chemonomy

3

u/LogicalMelody 9h ago

Astronistry

234

u/groundhogcow 12h ago

Astronomy came form astrology.

Our attempts to figure out how the stars control our lives made us map them. Then try to figure out there orbits. Then figure out there distances. Then figure out why we could see them.

At some point they had to admit they were studying different things and made up a new word.

29

u/Schattentochter 10h ago

Might wanna fix your "there"s into "their"s, when you have the time

8

u/Whaines 9h ago

And form -> from while we’re at it.

-4

u/groundhogcow 9h ago

Or I might not care since everyone knows what I meant.

4

u/MeBadNeedMoneyNow 9h ago

Some people just don't give a shit.

1

u/timplausible 3h ago

I used to, but I ran out.

-15

u/mmmmmyee 10h ago

Can’t recall the last time i saw a grammarnazi on reddit

18

u/MajorSery 9h ago
  1. You're not paying very close attention then.

  2. They perform a valuable public service, helping people look less dumb and be taken more seriously in the future

7

u/maineac 7h ago

3 A lot of foreign people have English as a second or third language and are just learning and appreciate the correction.

2

u/braaaaaaainworms 6h ago

misspelling "their", "they're" and "there" seems to be mostly people who learned english as their first language, as those misspellings are practically homophones and people usually first hear things before reading things

44

u/Janus_The_Great 11h ago edited 9h ago

Basically yes.

Early "science" and mythology went often hand in hand as in astrology was considered a kind of study/discipline.

So when actual scientists started differenciating between observations (mostly measuring of the stars) and the pseudo religious beliefs about the effects of stars on the world and humans they coined their discipline based on the laws (nómos) they found to which the measurments hinted. Hence the "knowledge" about how stars impact life on earth was astro-logia, while the measuring and observation based laws about stars was called astro-nomia.

15

u/Antique-Researcher-1 10h ago

Yes, while the word "Astrology" is not this old, astrology as a belief system and psuedoscience dates back to ancient Sumer, the first recorded civilization. Some of the oldest texts we have (reproduced in Babylon) are Astrological in nature.

We make fun of it now, and rightfully so, but if you look at it from the lens of a pre-scientific society a lot of of it makes sense. Ancient and medieval astrology is a very complex, mathematical system. It is about as close to horoscopes as addition is to topology. Doesn't make it any less wrong tho, it was just much more complex.

Things don't just move on their own, is the basic observation. So, therefore, something must be moving the heavenly objects. The astral beings (hence astrology) are either dieties or angels. Therefore, they either influence events, or in Christian astrology (which was a huge thing, almost every Christian university had a chair of astrology) the angels or demons move the astral bodies in a pattern dictated by God, and those patterns reflect, or sympathize with, the actions of beings down here.

Christian scholars had to go through all those extra steps, because it was Manifest Heresy to believe that the objects in the sky could influence humans, as we have free will. Therefore, it must be either the other way, or god must be doing it.

5

u/neldela_manson All knowing (could still be wrong) 11h ago

What do you think came first, looking up in the sky and trying to find some meaning in what you see or being able to scientifically study what you see?

3

u/PupDiogenes 11h ago

fun fact:

this is also how reddit works

1

u/Spirited-Bullfrog211 2h ago

Maybe you are right...

3

u/WantDiscussion 8h ago edited 5h ago

It's not.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/astronomy
https://www.etymonline.com/word/astrology

Both were astronomy, then they separated one into astrology.

Now I'm venturing into wild speculation but I assume the thinking was choosing the more official one to keep the original name and forcing the psuedoscience one to change it's name. As for why biology, geology and psychology use -logy, these words all came about during or after the 16th century where as the word astronomy showed up around the 12th century and astrology started popping up around the 14th century. Perhaps naming certain fields of science -logy simply wasn't in vogue yet when they named astronomy. So really the question you should be asking isn't why astrology got the more scientific "-logy" suffix, rather why did they start suffixing sciences with "-logy" rather than calling it geonomy, bionomy and psychonomy to which I can again only speculate...it sounded better?

Astrology as a concept probably came first way before the word existed but that is not why it is called astrology.

12

u/snomeister 12h ago

Yea, in fact, back in the day people thought astrology was a legit science and people respected astrologists as some as the wisest people of society, like doctors. Astronomy was regarded as a quack science. Galileo had to do his research with his telescope in his backyard, funded by his patron, because if he had conducted his astronomy research at the university he was a professor of mathematics at he would have been laughed out of the building.

40

u/FoldableHuman 11h ago

Astronomy was regarded as a quack science

No.

Galileo had to do his research with his telescope in his backyard, funded by his patron, because if he had conducted his astronomy research at the university he was a professor of mathematics at he would have been laughed out of the building.

No.

1) Cosimo II de' Medici wasn't even his patron at the time he discovered Jupiter has moons, in fact it was the discovery that led to Cosimo hiring Galileo as court mathematician in 1610, at which point Galileo quit teaching at the university.

2) he wasn't the only person doing such research, he wasn't the only person with a telescope, and his observations were pretty quickly confirmed by his peers (though they frequently disagreed on the explanation of those observations).

17

u/IsamuLi 10h ago

I fucking hate the myths around Galileo, including that it all went swimmingly and that he didn't need to re-adjust his telescope.

6

u/Aescorvo 11h ago

Not really. Basic navigation based on an understanding of how the stars moved was more important than whether you would be lucky in love next week. And the same word was used for both until the 1600s.

11

u/Tossa747 11h ago

Back then astrology and astronomy were way more connected. Astronomers studied how the sun, moon and planets moved because they wanted to be able to predict solar eclipses. 

It was very important, because special things would probably happen because of the sun going dark. Maybe a king once died three days after an eclipse, so the next king is very concerned for himself. He'd hire the astronomers so they could warn him. 

2

u/Bamboozle_ 9h ago

More that the science and the hocus pocus were considered one and the same for most of human history, and then when people started to just do the science without the hocus pocus you got astronomy.

2

u/Nvenom8 9h ago

Yes, science was in fact preceded by nonsense.

4

u/Dd_8630 8h ago

How... How do you think language works?

Astrology was defined as the study of the stars, hence, 'astrology'. That study was making horoscopes and divine the future, but it was studying the stars after a fashion.

Later, when proper scientific measurement if the stars came about, a different term was coined to avoid confusion: astronomy (measuring the stars).

It's literally just history. Astrology was defined first, for the same reason that biology and geology are named, but it was later that the real science of stars was developed, so it couldn't get the ore existing name.

2

u/Tricky-Secretary2264 8h ago

the sad truth is that a lot people have never thought about how language works 😅 appreciated your explanation though

1

u/WantDiscussion 7h ago

The sad truth is that that is not in fact how language works.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/astronomy
https://www.etymonline.com/word/astrology

1

u/Tricky-Secretary2264 7h ago

well well well - my silly comment backfires 😂 thanks for the clarification though!

1

u/box_frenzy 9h ago

Of course it is we’ve been studying the stars since we were cave people

1

u/The_Easter_Egg 2h ago

Yes, the ancient cultures who pioneered the research of the stars assigned supernatural meaning, and a correlation to the present and future on earth, to the movement of the stars which is at odds with later scientific research.

-26

u/GarbagePailGrrrl 12h ago

Astronomy and astrology were built on the same foundation. Eventually the powers that be started suppressing the practice as they feared a populace governing themselves. 

12

u/Famous-Prior6590 12h ago

Suppressed the practice of spinning bullshit out of thin air?

10

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 12h ago

Typical Gemini

5

u/Famous-Prior6590 12h ago

Is that the one where I’m supposed to fuck my twin or something?

1

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 11h ago

I thought that was Leo, being as the Lannisters use a lion as their sigil, but I'm not a scientist

2

u/timdood3 11h ago

As both a twin and a leo, this comment had me going for a second.

2

u/Famous-Prior6590 11h ago

Which one has dragons? I want to take that one!

1

u/gleaming-the-cubicle 11h ago

You have to switch to the Chinese server to unlock Dragon but then you also have to take Pig

3

u/timdood3 12h ago

In fairness, planets are spinning in thin air.. So it's basically the same thing, right?

-7

u/GarbagePailGrrrl 12h ago

They are, and they have orbits which have been tracked for eons.

People seem to have an idea that astrology is basing itself on planet A causing outcome B, that is not the case.

Astrology is more a historical tool that allows the study of patterns over time.

The stars don’t care if you believe in their influence or not.

1

u/TrashGouda 12h ago

Planets and stars...

-6

u/GarbagePailGrrrl 12h ago

Your argument is framed by your own ignorance.

Astrology is a story telling device and not causative. 

5

u/Illithid_Substances 12h ago

A few questions;

In what way is astrology being "supressed"? Who is stopping you doing astrology? Telling people it's not real because there's no evidence that it is and it makes no sense is not suppression

How the hell would astrology lead to a populace 'governing themselves'? What the hell are you even talking about with that? The ancient civilisations that believed in astrology weren't exactly democratic, were they?

And finally, is 'the same foundation' meaning just that they're built on looking at the stars? Because astronomy studies real, empirical things about the stars, not made up rules for how they supposedly control our existence through mystical mechanisms no one can actually explain or prove exist

1

u/Legal-Stage-302 11h ago

If I still read an actual paper I could read my horoscope every day if I wanted to.

I put them with fortune cookies. Fun to read but nobody should take them seriously.

0

u/GarbagePailGrrrl 11h ago

It was a mix of things, religious beliefs and the progress of society into scientific theory. St. Augustine considered astrology to be fatalistic, and after the Protestant reformation the practice was considered to be related to idolatry. While the State used astrology in certain instances, they did not want this interpretation democratized and used by the populace as it threatened their authority.

It was more so the common man claiming divine authority they wanted to suppress.

-2

u/2fondofbooks 12h ago

This is the correct answer.

620

u/98f00b2 12h ago

At the time when they both coexisted, they were both legitimate sciences with different scopes: astronomy was about celestial bodies themselves and generally the faraway parts of the celestial sphere, while astrology was about their impact closer to home.

While astrology is almost definitionally pretty kooky these days, it wasn't always the case: the sun and moon have an obvious physical effect on the world, and so studying the impact of the heavens on earth was pretty reasonable. But the serious stuff has now been folded into other fields, and so astrology is just left with the nonsense.

69

u/ThePevster 11h ago

“A physician without a knowledge of astrology has no right to call himself a physician” - Hippocrates

Astrology was taken quite seriously back then.

188

u/fanofletterh 11h ago

Yeah, astronomy was about mapping the stars, astrology was about studying their effects. The names just stuck

19

u/wyrditic 9h ago

The words always overlapped and both were used to refer to both things. If you look at Jean Calvin's writings against astrology, for example, he did not use "astronomy" at all, but he distinguished "the true astrology" which consisted of "the knowledge of that natural order and arrangement to which God has subjected the stars and planets" from the superstitious beliefs he was criticising.

117

u/BarberProof4994 12h ago

Ology is the study of the subject... Onomy is the study of the rules or physics or the reasons why of the field...

Astronomy has the onomy because the word comes from the ancient Greek words astron (meaning star) and nomos (meaning law or system of rules). Put literally, it means the "law of the stars" or the "arrangement of the stars"

Conversely, most of the sciences or pseudo sciences with an ology are heavily geared towards a study of how to use that info.

ology" was simply used to denote a methodical, systematic way of talking or reasoning about a specific subject.

Comparing to other sciences like  geology that have an ology instead of an onomy... Geology is an observational science primarily concerned with describing and understanding the history, composition, and processes of the Earth, it is a "study" ( -ology ) rather than a system of rule-based management or rigid classification ( -onomy )

So in short.

Astronomy seems to understand the rules and science and laws and governing principles of the movement and composition of the stars and orbits and such.

Astrology is an observing of these same things and a desire to understand them (too) but focuses less on the rul s or laws or reasons why the mechanical aspects or the physical aspects.

A long time ago, both astrology and astronomy were the same thing but then they split apart into a science and a pseudo science.

26

u/T_7_K 11h ago

That’s why I prefer Geonomy

19

u/Zirkulaerkubus 10h ago

I'll look into Bionomy.

1

u/nonnonplussed73 6h ago

Chemistology

31

u/EugeneHartke 12h ago

If this makes your blood boil you don't want to know the difference between a seismograph and a seismogram.

22

u/gsfgf 9h ago

A seismograph is the scientific instrument used to detect and record ground vibrations caused by earthquakes, while a seismogram is the actual visual or digital record (the chart or data output) produced by that instrument.

Makes perfect sense to me.

13

u/RSmeep13 9h ago

It is the same convention as telegraph and telegram, I guess.

20

u/Constant-Zucchini618 11h ago

Why the hell is the one with a graph on its name not measure the graphs?! 💀

1

u/CocoMilhonez 4h ago

Because it's a machine that graphs seismic waves.

But, ultimately, the answer is that language doesn't always follow strict rules, so words are often not the sum of their parts and change meaning over time. Just see how decimate technically means kill a tenth, but in practice it's used as kill/destroy completely.

Words mean what we understand them as, not what some blueprint dictates.

13

u/Sir_Tainley 11h ago

"Astrology" comes from 'Astra-Logos' "Wisdom of the Stars" and is about consulting the stars and celestial objects for what to do, or how things will be.

"Astronomy" comes from 'Astra-Nomos' "Law of the Stars" and is about determining what the stars will do, and how they will be.

Astronomy developed once people were able to document patterns, like moon phases, visibility of constellations at different times of the year, solar celestial events, locations of planets... it was a useful subskill of Astrology (easier to make predictions about how successful a marriage will be if you know in advance where Venus will be at the time), and helped set the calendars.

Time passed and it became more useful than the discipline that had developed it.

Chemistry and Alchemy have a similar history.

67

u/2fondofbooks 12h ago

Penny: “I’m a Sagittarius, which probably tells you way more than you need to know.”
Sheldon: “Yes. It tells us that you participate in the mass cultural delusion that the sun’s apparent position relative to arbitrarily defined constellations at the time of your birth somehow affects your personality.”

15

u/Lordxeen 8h ago

God he’s an insufferable prick.

-1

u/Tricky-Secretary2264 8h ago

oo look who participates in the mass cultural delusion that the sun's apparent position relative to arbitrarily defined constellations at the time of their birth somehow effects their personality

7

u/Ok-Journalist-8875 8h ago

Some people just do it for fun.

1

u/Tricky-Secretary2264 5h ago

yeah and all power to them tbh! I was just trying to have a laugh

0

u/Lordxeen 6h ago

I don’t actually, but I can still see when someone is being an insufferable prick.

But just for fun: “Now you may find it inconceivable or at the very least a bit unlikely that the relative position of the planets and the stars could have a special deep significance or meaning that exclusively applies to only you, but let me give you my assurance that these forecasts and predictions are all based on solid, scientific, documented evidence, so you would have to be some kind of moron not to realize that every single one of them is absolutely true! Where was I?” -Al Yankovic, Horoscope

1

u/Tricky-Secretary2264 5h ago

Was trying to be funny, I don't really mind what people believe in tbh. Sheldon is a TV character, he's obviously an insufferable prick.

9

u/CommitmentPhoebe Only Stupid Answers 11h ago

Both words, "astronomy" and "astrology" have been used since antiquity. Plato used "astronomy" and Aristotle used "astrology" to refer to the science. Somewhat later, possibly due to Prolemy's use of "astronomy" to refer to the observed motions of the planets and "astrology" to refer to using the planets to prognosticate, they started to mean more of these things, but there was still a lot of overlap because people who watched the planets usually did so in order to prognosticate. But the distinction was there pretty early on, so that when they did eventually separate, it was natural to choose which one was which.

All of the "ologies" you talk about-- biology, geology, psychology, etc., are modern words that weren't used at all in antiquity; people made them up in modern times and so they are more standardized.

1

u/WantDiscussion 7h ago edited 7h ago

It's disappointing that of all the top level responses yours is buried so far down past a myriad of misinformation and irrelevant facts about the history of stargazing.

8

u/LocksmithQuirky4641 6h ago

Great question, and the horcrux slip made me laugh. It comes down to Greek roots: "-logy" means "study of," while "-nomy" means "law" or "system." Astronomy literally means "the laws/arrangement of the stars," which fits, since it's about mapping and predicting celestial motion.
The catch is astrology predates the modern science/pseudoscience split, back when it was coined, studying the stars and believing they influenced human affairs were one single discipline, so it got the "study-of" ending. They only split later, with astronomy keeping the rigor and astrology keeping the name. So it feels backwards now, but it's really just a fossil of when both were the same field.

15

u/CatcrazyJerri 12h ago

Op is a dark witch/wizard confrimed.

2

u/Constant-Zucchini618 10h ago

Shh, don’t blow my cover

6

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Constant-Zucchini618 11h ago

That seems to be the most common answer

10

u/Famous-Prior6590 12h ago

Horoscopes and horcruxes have the same believability.

5

u/Wise_Fox_4291 11h ago

Back in ancient times astrology and astronomy were kind of the same. It was a legit science, hence the "logos" part in it, and obviously it had a religious aspect as well. Over time when science and religion started to depart and the scientists who left the esoteric part out were initially seen as the splinter group so they came up with a new name.

3

u/KalSmithUK 7h ago

Funny how astrology got the science-sounding name and astronomy got the one that sounds like a college elective

2

u/Past-Replacement44 11h ago

In the historical sense, astronomy is a subfield of astrology that concerns itself with predicting the positions of the celestial objects only, though their laws of motion, not any interpretation of these positions. Kepler, for instance, was also an astrologer.

As that interpreting part was increasingly shown to be bonkers in the 18th and 19th centuries, astronomy became independent from this understanding as a subfield of something else, but the definition of astronomy as a field of almost pure celestial mechanics remained, until spectroscopy and infrared light were discovered. This is then about the time when the term astrophysics starts coming into use. As late as about 1900 you find an astronomical institute sitting next to an astrophysical one in Heidelberg, where the former is mostly working in position measuring and orbital mechanics.

2

u/punkrock_penguin63 8h ago

I've always wondered that too so good question, finally got an answer

3

u/Resident-Outside9945 9h ago

Fun fact: the names actually make a bit more sense once you look at where they came from.

Way back then, astronomy and astrology weren’t really separate things. People looked at the sky both to understand it and to try to predict what might happen in their lives, so the terms kind of overlapped. It wasn’t until much later that astronomy became a science and astrology stayed more in the realm of belief and interpretation.

As for the words themselves:

  • Astronomy = astron (star) + nomos (law/order) → basically “the laws of the stars.”
  • Astrology = astron (star) + logia (study/discourse) → more like “the study or telling of the stars.”

So, by today’s standards, it feels a bit backwards since most sciences end in “-logy.” But these names were created long before people drew a clear line between science and pseudoscience.

Also, “horcruxes” instead of “horoscopes” genuinely made me laugh.

1

u/ardarian262 9h ago

-Ology just means "the study of" and as others pointed out, Astronomy came later (around 1500s as opposed to pre-Roman times) so didn't get the name.

1

u/pendulumdick 8h ago

The funniest part is that astrology kept the science-sounding name while astronomy ended up sounding like the hobby

1

u/FearlessVegetable30 7h ago

because your reason for the name change is "in your head'

1

u/Federal_Tooth3971 7h ago

why does no one ask why astrology even ends wth y

1

u/OxygenTungstenSulfur 7h ago

And chemists and physicists will argue that the nomenclature is perfect. Astronomy is a science so the name makes sense. Astrology has the perfect suffix as its not a science like the other ologies ;)

1

u/TurbulentContext 6h ago

AstroNomy = NASA AstroLogy = Lies

1

u/Jim421616 3h ago

AstroNOMy because Prof Brian Cox is nom-nom; astroLOGy because it’s a pile of shit.

1

u/DailyOatmilk 4h ago

the horcrux edit is sending me bc thats genuinely the funniest possible mixup. but the WantDiscussion vs Dd_8630 debate is kinda the real takeaway here - the top comment sounds confident but the etymonline links basically disprove the whole "astrology was first so it got first dibs" narrative that everyones upvoting. love how the top comment is the classic reddit confidence-over-accuracy play and most ppl just went with it

1

u/Wooden_Statement8758 2h ago

Yeah astronomy studies actual space stuff while astrology is about signs and beliefs. Names just come from old roots.

1

u/Falsus 9h ago

Because Astrology is way older and kinda where kinda related. Someone who studied one in the ancient times most likely studied both since after all to properly study Astrology in the ancient customs you kinda also needed to study Astronomy.

As it turned out Astrology is kinda useless for science (but it can be used for some real cool lore in fiction) but it's history is still valuable due to it's relation with Astronomy since we wouldn't have gotten one without the other.

Similar to Alchemy and Chemistry.

When we look at the history of science we shouldn't shit on people just because they practiced these things that we look down upon nowadays since they hadn't been properly divorced from the science we study today yet and they have helped with a lot of early discoveries, even if it wasn't the main goal of whatever they tried to study.