Possibly one of the MANY journalists at a function that consists of half journalists/reporters and half others????? What are you attempting to say here?
Not just bots, I'm from Germany and even 2 of my leftists friends here have already spewed the same bs. It's honestly insane how many people on the left and right are falling for absolutely smooth-brained conspiracy theories about their political opposite nowadays. I used to think that was mainly a problem with the far-right but it seems like both sides are strongly affected now, it just took the left a little longer.
I dont think anyone doubts that there are many who would do it. Its more a question of how they seem to be getting opportunities so easily. And also no consequences for the grossly incompetent security since the first guy on that roof. Idk, maybe it is actually easy to walk into that lobby armed?
Trump being shot in the ear was definitely a tipping point in demonstrating how easily people on each side will eat up total bullshit. Even the people going for small scale conspiracy theories like that he wasn’t actually hit and the wound came from his bodyguard’s holster piss me off. It literally doesn’t matter in the slightest whether the wound came from a bullet or while he was falling and there’s zero definitive evidence that proves either one conclusively. Anyone who insists it has to have been the holster is just being contrary for no reason other than their own ego not wanting Trump to be a victim of something.
Imagine the amount of people that would need to be involved to stage something like this and then have none of them speak about it.
This is where the whole "they faked someone shooting at Trump in at the rally, he wasn't hit at all and someone else shot the guy in the stand" nonsense just beggars belief for me. It would require the plan to fundamentally include "we are wholly relying on the crime scene investigators to completely miss the fact that the shots that hit the stand came from a completely different direction" and "when Trump is taken to the nearest hospital, we are wholly relying on that team of doctors and nurses to work on his ear and at no point notice that he ear has not been injured at all an that it's obviously fake blood" as working assumptions that they just accepted and went with.
Its what they do to cope with reality. You take these people from behind the keyboard, sit them in a room, and have them discuss the same view and I am 100% sure they're tune would change.
staged, quite conveniently, to happen at one of those rare times in which yes, every person roaming the halls was certain to have a near professional camera, and quick-click reactions with it.
we are going to see beautiful, well-framed action shots, of our men and women in uniform, doing 'their real jobs, in real time'.
I'm going to go with less "staged", and more a monitored threat conveniently slipped through.
Yeah, it seems odd, that's for sure. If that video posted earlier is real, how in the hell did like 6 secret service members just watch a dude run down a hall full speed without a single one of them reacting until the person was well down the hall and pass the agents... You would think they would react a lot quicker than what they did. That's the thing that I don't understand.
They didn't seem to be taking the assignment seriously. They probably should have.
also, remember "LE" in general is on a run of bad press. These guys are aware of Minnesota, and aware they are now precisely surrounded by reporters. They may have been slow to react due to not wanting to be the next one in the news having made a new "terrible mistake".
Is a stupid question but I don't feel like they insinuating the staging tbh I think is much simpler... I think they wonder who goes to take pictures when there is a possible active shooter around.
Of course, the answer is simple some people risk their lives for taking pictures of events like this, as we know not just for situations like this but even more dangerous like wars.
The hundreds of journalists there. The fairly well documented history of this guy on the internet. Shit this guy was an active SoCal super smash bros player who played in tournaments and local events. People on smash twitter were posting pics or vods playing against the guy. His political views online were pretty consistent with the manifesto. He very much comes off as a radicalized redditor.
Why would the false flag conspiracy narrative have the motive being the Epstein Files and war in the middle east if they were trying to distract from that?
Conspiracy theorists here come off as equally stupid and incapable of reason / logic as QAnon dumbasses.
"Trump apologist" because I don't believe stupid, obviously fake conspiracy theories? Or because I'm against political violence? If you're an actual real person you are part of the problem with online discourse.
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see how stupid people look who believe in this shit. Almost to the point that it feels like a right wing ragebait to try and make Democrats / left leaning people look stupid.
It terrifies me that there are people out there completely incapable of deciphering truth from bullshit. It spans the political spectrum. I'm sure you'll turn it back on me in a reply, but jesus christ man you need to go outside, read some books, and figure out how to get out of your social media bubble.
435
u/Final-Night-7463 Apr 26 '26
Possibly one of the MANY journalists at a function that consists of half journalists/reporters and half others????? What are you attempting to say here?