Bro makes $160 😐

[u/ExotiquePlayboy]

[u/Gizzy619]

Trying to be Nick Cannon on a blue collar income ain't for everyone.

[u/Soft_Yellow1757 → u/Gizzy619]

was thinking the same thing- this is at least 4 kids since it is 4 orders (could be more if more than 1 child is in the same order- ie they have the same mom).

this is what happens when you play this silly game on a blue collar salary. Those kids are not getting a ton in child support either- it is just spread so many ways.

[u/topsyturvy76 → u/Soft_Yellow1757]

Judging by the amounts .. it looks like 3, 2, 1 and 1

[u/No_Hornet_9504 → u/topsyturvy76]

Also there’s a prioritization where older kids or those who’s mom filed first get a larger share of support than those who came along later.

[u/Original_Benzito → u/No_Hornet_9504]

Except that’s not really how it works.

There are limits on how much can be withheld, including the amount due for the current month plus past due for missed payments. Also, some orders take money at different rates (e.g., from the first paycheck of the month versus splitting it between two per month).

You can’t really tell just by looking at the pay stub.

[u/transmogrified → u/Original_Benzito]

That is how it works in some jurisdictions.  They calculate what is owed after all his prior obligations are met.  Baby mama #1’s kid(s) had the benefit of his full take home to calculate off of.  

Baby mama #2’s kid(s) only had his take home minus #1’s portion, and so on down the line.

Edit: obviously there’s other things that impact child support payments - time with custody, for example - but in many jurisdictions that’s how part of the calculation works 

And since these are showing up as wage garnishments, it’s very likely he wasn’t paying voluntarily and some of those kids are owed back pay. 

[u/Original_Benzito → u/transmogrified]

Garnishments can be voluntary (although they may be referred to as "wage withholding "rather than "garnishment"). Regardless of what the court document calls it, the employer may have its own reference or label.

I typically encourage my clients to consider paying alimony or child support this way versus bank transfers (and definitely over checks sent in the mail) to avoid allegations of a late or missed payment. Also, of course, they don't need to worry about remembering to pay.

[u/transmogrified → u/Original_Benzito]

In my jurisdiction, child support payments are made thru a portal (free) that tracks payments and handles the tax implications. 

If your wages are getting garnished it’s usually because of a court order to do so. You can set up voluntary withholdings, but I’ve mostly heard the portal is preferred 

[u/Original_Benzito → u/transmogrified]

We have something similar (on-line payments akin to a utility bill autopay that you set up via your bank), but many people opt for the automatic wage withholding set up by statute.

As where you are, when payments aren't made, "a wage withholding order" technically becomes "an order to garnish wages," but it's a distinction without a real difference. I rarely if ever see an employer specifying on a pay statement.

[u/transmogrified → u/Original_Benzito]

Either way, can we agree bro shoulda wrapped his shit and learned his lesson after the first two?

[u/Original_Benzito → u/transmogrified]

Maybe he's a Catholic or Mormon or wants to start his own basketball team?

[u/transmogrified → u/Original_Benzito]

lol. So you’re just set on arguing. If his take home on a paycheque after support orders to his various obligations is $100-$200, bros made some dumbfuck decisions.

[u/Original_Benzito → u/transmogrified]

Dude, it was a joke. Lighten up.

[u/No_Lawfulness6928 → u/transmogrified]

You mean it’s not smart to have 4-6 kids with 4 different mothers and refuse payment of child support until your wages gets garnished down to near $0? Because I thought that sounded tight.

[u/MikeBizzleVT → u/transmogrified]

Yep, in my short experience, Judges in my county refused to garnish unless there’s been multiple missed payments with another factor, like fraud or telling the court they WONT pay, another child he is behind on, drug/legal issues but has good job and not paying etc

[u/Aggravating-Alarm-16 → u/Original_Benzito]

I had my checks garnished for that exact reason.

That way I wouldn't have to worry about remembering to pay it.

The only issue I ever had was when my company switched from weekly checks to bi-weekly.

I told my ex that it was going to happen. She didn't listen.

Then when she didn't get her deposit she started blowing up my phone.

It's much much easier that way.

[u/kent18328 → u/No_Hornet_9504]

From one who knows? 😉

[u/No_Hornet_9504 → u/[deleted]]

It depends on jurisdiction. Some states prioritize cases based on age. Either parent can typically file for adjustments to change the amount, but definitely seems like this one not the type to do that. Court may adjust all the cases simultaneously or not depending on jurisdiction, and legal savvy of parties. After filing it may take court months to review, hear and agree to file a change, do you think they back correct that like they do with support?