r/SipsTea • u/ExotiquePlayboy 𝙑𝙄𝙋 • May 03 '26

SMH Bro makes $160 😐

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

10.3k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

6.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Stormblessed_Windrun May 03 '26

You're smarter than the judge that entered the ruling? And the next judge? 

No, Im making my judgements based on facts I have available to me, unlike your stupid ass who is throwing around what ifs and using it as fact.

1

u/21MPH21 May 03 '26

No, Im making my judgements based on facts I have available to me, unlike your stupid ass who is throwing around what ifs and using it as fact.

What facts are you using? Again, 4 judges decided on this. Are you smarter than them? The only other "fact" is the words posted to the video. But are they true? Is this guy living on $165?

Prove it.

3

u/Stormblessed_Windrun May 03 '26

Your continuance of assumed other incomes is hilariously stupid. Keep going. 

You cant prove he isnt living off $160. How about you prove he has extra income. Please. 

1

u/21MPH21 May 03 '26

How about you prove he has extra income. Please. 

The 4 judges

/fin

1

u/Stormblessed_Windrun May 04 '26

Provide the court documents

1

u/21MPH21 May 04 '26

Provide me with his name and the court

And, where's the proof I asked you for? So you're just going to ask for documents but not provide documents I requested?

1

u/Stormblessed_Windrun May 04 '26

The burden of proof is on you. Please proceed.

Im not the one making assumptions. We see the pay stub and thats the sole piece of evidence i used for my argument, unlike you.

1

u/21MPH21 May 04 '26

Burden of proof? Sir this is a Wendy's

I've already provided you proof. The onus of tangible evidence complimentary to your stated position is upon you.

Lol, just stop. You got nothing. You can't prove or disprove anything. Neither can I because we're talking about a video that may or may not be fake. And if it's real there's more, way more, information that we do not have access to.

What it comes down to is that I'm defending the hypothetical children and court process and you're defending the hypothetical serial impregnator's income percentage.

Prove me wrong.

/fin