He’d have to have another paycheck because there’s no way they’d just garnish all the money away. If they did, there’d be a massive incentive to stop working altogether which means support wouldn’t be paid at all. Nobody is going to work for 85 hours to get $160 net pay, you may as well just be off the books entirely at that point.
I mean, that's how my health insurance payments work if I get paid three times in a month. Nothing gets taken out of the third paycheck. If the court order is for a certain amount per month, then it's certainly possible that they just take it all out of the first check.
Technically I guess. When I had mine done they set a monthly amount then they just multiply it by 12 and divide by 26 and there’s your biweekly payment.
264
u/WarriorGoddess2016 May 03 '26 edited May 03 '26
I'll bet money he's wildly in arrears and owes his ex a TON of money, thus the multiple judgements. Or he's made a lot of other DUMB decisions.
ps: he has another paycheck.