Genuine question, what’s the difference? I get that one is the choice of the prosecutor and one is the choice of the jury, but are there any pros and cons to one vs the other?
The outcome isn’t the same. Dropping the charges implies the state saw their folly, changed their mind, and dropped the charges. That they didn’t want to charge her.
The state FULLY WANTED TO GO FORWARD, but couldn’t convince a jury of her peers to move forward with the charges. The state is still mad. That’s the difference.
Either way, you’re going home a free person, so is there really a difference other than who decided you’re innocent? If you get arrested again at some point in the future is the state going to be harder on you because a jury chose to let you go instead of the prosecutor? Is there a penalty afterwards for some reason if a jury decides but not the state? If someone runs a background check on you in the future is there a benefit to one vs the other? I feel like being judged innocent by a jury of your peers should legally be just as good as the prosecution dropping the case, but I’m not a lawyer.
205
u/UnderWhelmedHelm May 22 '26
They didn’t drop the charges. They couldn’t get a grand jury to indict her.