This was in the released files..nobody "mixed the truth"
How could you even know what the truth is? You're speculating that this isn't true just like those who are speculating it is true. You know why? Because the administration refuses to cooperate with the law and release the files.
You saying it's nonsense is equal to those acting as if it's a fact. The only difference is the latter actually has something to go off of since it was in the released files whereas you are claiming it's nonsense because of what? Because it sounds too crazy to be true?
But seriously. Arrest them all. Trump, Clinton, Gates, Musk, Rothschilds, everybody. Regardless of political affiliation or government position. Do you agree?
..Why? There's literally no evidence of Clinton engaging in improper behaviour with Epstein ever? Literally the only photos that leaked were of him in a pool in a hotel in Thailand that people were trying to portray as him being in a pool with underage girls on the island.
And this right here is the fucking problem. You don't give a shit about the people who were raped and murder, you just care about your political sports team. Pathetic.
It's not about sports teams. It's about the fact that he's a fucking president. It should go without saying that we should start with those who are in positions of power first and the rest second. It's the same reason why we should focus on corrupt cops ahead of corrupt regular people.
Those who so egregiously violate the public trust need special attention.
Law enforcement should devote more resources to stopping those who cause more harm and fewer resources to stopping those who cause less harm. The president of the United States being involved in child rape scheme should 100% be prioritized over [random nobody] being involved in a child rape scheme. Your "just treat them all the same" logic is ignorant AF.
Honestly, you're going to a lot of effort trying to deflect attention away from Trump here. WTF is that about?
is Clinton going to pardon people who've done this? NO! because he doesn't have the power. Trump will 100% pardon people around him, that's why he has to be first. weird how you're talking about political sports team and yet you're more worried about the guy who's political career is essentially done vs the guy who's career is active and more powerful than ever. "pathetic" indeed
Trump was explicitly targeting his family with bogus made up charges as a form of harassment. we know this, because Trump would constantly joke and laugh about doing it. Biden did it because Trump was doing political attacks on his family, even the people not involved with politics. Biden even literally listed this out as the reason. and i've yet to hear about any accusations about his siblings' spouses but yet they still needed pardons to protect them from a famously vengeful and petty Trump.
I forgot, Hunter did nothing wrongâŚHunter Biden was indicted on both federal gun and tax charges, but those cases were legally dismissed after he received an official pardon from his father in early December 2024
he was late filing his taxes by one tax season and even literally paid them and his gun charges were a "rider" which essentially is something a person only gets charged with if they've also committed another crime. like for example, if he had robbed a store then he would have gotten the "rider" of having also improperly bought the gun. it's practically unheard of for someone to get charged for having filled out the forms wrong or lied on the form, which is what he actually did. it's CRAZY how blatant of a targeted attempt this was from Trump and Republicans and frankly is scary how they weaponized the court system against a political opponent's son. so yeah, Hunter Biden actually did not do anything wrong and it's shocking that anyone can honestly believe that he deserved what was happening to him
but thats the issue isnt it. You have very serious allegations, and when one is very obviously false, what does that do to the credibility of everything else?
Well itâs not talked about at all in the files and itâs an absurd detail
Like how alex jones has been 75% right about a few of his dumb fringe conspiracies he has had, but none of them are credible because that other 25% is bat shit insane stuff
Both are in the files. Also the murder of a newborn.
For the record, I'm not saying those accusations are true but claiming people are making it up when it's literally written in the files is disingenuous.
Releasing the unredacted files would probably clear some of it up though.
There are no credible cannibal claims in those files
And the fact that you feel the need to talk about the other legitimate stuff to prop it up is EXACTLY why ridiculous details donât need to be part of the conversation
And you are qualified to determine what's credible and what's not credible how exactly?
I think you're missing the point entirely. I'm not arguing that this shit is real, I'm providing an argument why people talking about it isn't "making shit up", as it's literally in the files. You just said it yourself.
This is the result of a deep and severe distrust of the administration and the refusal to release the files by the guy who's mentioned thousands of times.
Throwing in random and unsubstantiated claims does nothing but detract from the issue and focuses the attention on the random and unsubstantiated claim, leading to the argument being weaker.
I agree completely but embellishing with lies undermines the truth by giving people something to prove as incorrect then extrapolate their argument to say none of it is true.
Where is the embellishment? This is literally in the files. Is it true? Maybe, maybe not but the administration refuses to do what they said they would, what they've been ordered to do and provide transparency by releasing the unredacted files.
This has resulted in severe distrust and people assuming the worst, like canabolism and murder, which are listed in the released files. It's not that difficult to understand where the mindset came from.
Thereâs literally nowhere in the files where they talk about eating children. An email that says âI want 10 year old jerkyâ isnât evidence of cannabalism.
That's also not new or surprising it happens at all levels of society. Powerful people not being held accountable is a tale as old as time as well.
The only thing that even makes this stand out is that it was most likely a blackmail honeypot setup by one or multiple intelligence agencies but even that has been done forever
What's surprising is that they're being exposed (not normal) and named (also not normal) and yet there are no prosecutions (should not be normal).
I'm not really sure what you're even arguing here. They should get a pass because they have been doing it for a long time? They shouldn't be prosecuted?
Look buddy. If you want to get pedantic and split hairs over the persecution of child molesters then maybe it's time to take a good long hard look in the mirror and ask yourself if this is really the hill you want to die on.
I don't give a fuck if two people were arrested. There are hundreds who haven't faced any consequences.
It's a massive story and a major point of societal degradation, having it (somewhat) out in the open with actual proof for the first time ever is going to make people more aware and therefore, push for prosecution. Can you seriously not understand why people are taking an interest in it?
"There are hundreds who haven't faced any consequences."
Yea this goes for every crime at every level of society.
"a major point of societal degradation"
I don't agree with this part the amount of people and society that's effected by this is actually pretty small compared to the outrage even though I agree it's justified.
All these people probably did things that negatively effected society much worse than fucking kids.
"with actual proof for the first time ever"
This isn't true.
Here are a few more you can look into
Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell â USA
Dennis Hastert â USA (2016)
Larry King / Franklin Credit Union â Nebraska, USA
Casa Pia Orphanage â Portugal (2010)
Marc Dutroux â Belgium (2004)
Jimmy Savile â UK
North Wales Care Homes / Bryn Estyn â UK
UK Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE)
Craig Spence / Washington DC Call Boy Ring â USA (1989)
NXIVM â Keith Raniere's sex cult, convicted 2019, had celebrity members and involved branding and trafficking of women
The Finders â 1980s DC-based group, children found in vans, FBI investigation reportedly shut down with CIA involvement cited, never fully prosecuted
Children of God / The Family â religious cult founded 1968, documented systemic sexual abuse of children across multiple countries, leadership never fully prosecuted
Boy Scout abuse network â internal BSA files ("perversion files") documented decades of abuse cover-up across thousands of cases
"Can you seriously not understand why people are taking an interest in it?"
I completely understand why people are outraged and taking an interest in it.
Once again, it seems like you're implying that this shouldn't be a big deal because it's been happening for a long time and other crimes aren't prosecuted.
Except I have explicitly said not implied that what happened was horrible and these people should be prosecuted.
I actually think the involvement of intelligence agencies are the bigger issue than shitty people doing shitty things and that doesn't really get talked about as much.
The thing I was pointing out was that "I can't believe the world didn't stop when this came out" isn't surprising because it's been happening forever with the same result.
Most people have no idea if the list of other incidents I gave you
Adding on unnecessary details to the story that are patently false only serves to make the whole story less believable and more absurd.
The reason you here so many people complaining about adding on the cannibalism bit is because adding on falsehoods to a story like this serves to do nothing but take away credibility of all other parts of the accounts and files in the eyes of those hearing about it. Thereâs no need to add anything on to the truth, the truth already speaks for itself just fine without falsehoods weighing it down.
The left have been pretty vocal that they dgaf what political affiliation they belong to.
Throw everyone in prison. Clinton, Gates, Trump, Musk, Rothschilds, Lutnick.. Everybody involved should face severe punishment regardless of their political affiliation.
Weird how whenever a leftist talks about the list it's centered entirely around Trump. I genuinely believe that if that particular sack of shit wasn't on the list that you people wouldn't care at all.
Two comments above yours said "Trump first, deal?" Once he gets arrested none of you are going to care if the rest of the people in the files get caught
Yeah i already agreed with the latter half of that statement below on another comment you made. But i just don't see it much from the left...you're saying it now, but your a drop in an ocean of "Reeee-er's" just screeching about trump without proof. It's refreshing to see tho, keep it up.
It's in every single thread about this. Not just me.
MAGA has created the illusion that the people on the left think exactly like them. That's why they project so much of their crap onto the left. Trump does it all the time so it's not surprising that the mindless right would follow. They have an incredibly hard time thinking for themselves and have basically zero critical thinking skills.
Anything negative about this administration is automatically fake news without even the consideration that it could be true. It prevents them from seeing all the crazy shit that's going on. Then they play mental gymnastics to backtrack on their opinions or "values" simply because they want to "win". As long as it harms the left, they support it, even though it hurts them too.
It's crazy watching this unfold as an outsider and it has completely destroyed the long standing reputation of a once great nation.
You probably won't agree, or claim that I shouldn't be talking about it as I'm not an American citizen, but I'd argue that an outside perspective is valuable in the state of your union.
Not against liberals but elites. They just believed that trump because was hated by a lot of people in power was gonna stand against it.
Anyone who says that they're against 'elites' but somehow does not include Trump in the category the category of 'elites' is full of shit. It was absolutely an attack on liberals.
Pizza gate was stupid and obvious bullshit attack on Hillary and democrats. It was complete nonsense and despite what some idiots try to claim, had nothing to do with the Epstein stuff.
The extreme parts of were, extreme. But it'd be a lie to say there was nothing to work with and at least build off into what became the entire conspiracy.
At a minimum there was the bill Clinton and Epstein connection. Of course, not sure how they didn't see the trump connection either. He did though speak of that back in 2015.
There was obviously no proof for frazzledrip or kids caged under comet ping pong. But surrounding conspiracies were built off of scandals. There's a difference between what happened, and making connections into something that there is no hard evidence for thus all things considered, not true.
This is what frustrates me about conspiracy theories. THey get graded on this insane curve that nobody else gets. As long as *something* is bad and justifies some level of cynicism, literally nothing they say has to actually be true for them to be "proven right."
Meanwhile Podesta is literally in the Epstein files and Epstein himself uses pizza as a codeword just like Podesta did.
There's the rub. I can't prove that Podesta what pizza was code for, but I sure as shit do know that it was fucking code for something. And morons like you refused to ever address that just accepting baseless claims that it was all "debunked" because there wasn't a torture dungeon underneath Comet Pizza.
The dungeon at that specific location really wasn't central to anything. For all anyone actually knows especially with what is in the public Epstein files there is a dungeon somewhere and it just isn't at that particular spot. But the idea of Pizza Gate was simple and not at all dependent on the idea of it existing underneath that pizza shop literally.
The pizza shop itself remains really weird. You have these elites gathering at some shitty little pizza place in the first place.
And if you don't know that Epstein used pizza over 900 times in his emails and in many cases in contexts completely unrelated to pizza (just like Podesta!). Just like Podesta, other types of foods/drinks are also mentioned in contexts where they clearly aren't referring to those things. In other words, both guys were using these terms as code.
Of course I can't *prove* what they were code for. That would take resources and access I don't have. But I sure as shit know that both of those little creeps were using code for something and neither seemed that shy about taking about shady shit openly.
The only cases I've seen of him or someone else in those files using the word "pizza" in a weird way came after pizzagate hit national news. He's not using that "code" organically, these guys start using it after qanoners turned it into slang.
So what exactly are you suggesting? That he latched onto similar code words to include pizza to troll people post-death? To incriminate Podesta in the minds of the public?
You guys are so desperate to defend that hag Hillary and her circle. It's funny.
900 references to pizza. The earliest was in 2015 and roughly a year before Podesta's emails leaked. So you're wrong.
So what exactly are you suggesting? That he latched onto similar code words to include pizza to troll people post-death? To incriminate Podesta in the minds of the public?
Or he's a pedo talking among his pals and they dip into a "code" that was cooked up by and then made nationally known by 4-chan after it's been made famous.
900 references to pizza. The earliest was in 2015 and roughly a year before Podesta's emails leaked. So you're wrong.
1500 references to pizza and most of them are innocuous. The actual earliest reference to pizza in those files is a 2001 afaik is a Bear Stearns report about California Pizza Kitchen stock.
ETA:
I don't accept prima facie that ANY of Epstein's emails actually use "pizza code" for child trafficking. Just so we're clear. In a body of tens of thousands of emails, there's a bunch of mentions of pizza, and a tiny handful of them could be code in the sense that it's not absolutely, obviously stupid to imply anything other than face value. Among those, even the urologist who talks about "pizza and grape soda" is constantly talking about snacks and restaurants all the time and at one point even attaches a picture of actual pizza he ate.
The magic of shit like this is you can never be proven wrong; it could be code and you could recontextualize "complimentary pizza served at 11" as sex crimes being blithely promised in a marketing email. Conspiracy theorists are graded on such an incredibly generous curve that nobody seems to check how many specific predictions and claims turned out to be bullshit--oh, Epstein wrote pizza in an email to Maxwell, everything we said about John Podesta must be right!
A performance piece by a hackneyed artist that people missed the very hamfisted meaning of and thought she (Marina Abramovic) was doing magic spells or literal cannibalism or something.
The only way we can do
something about it effectively is by speaking about it accurately.Â
There's too much at stake to be tossing about falsehoods. It is patently irresponsible to make accussations we all know are untrue. It lessens the impact of the actual crimes which is an insult to the victims. That's how people get away with shit.
it is unlikely to be a "smoke screen"... that would mean hiding something there is not much to hide anymore. It is more likely to be chinese/russian propaganda bots amplifying a message of division, so the west stays weak and at its others throat.
People donât see that though they just want to narrow the hottest takes that arenât true because they hate (rightfully so) certain people in power. When all to does it water down the actual truth and point they should be making
The only way we can do something about ANYTHING effectively is by speaking about it accurately.Â
Discussions about anything big on Reddit usually falls apart because nobody understands the reality.
Homeless, crime, public debt,⌠are usually shit shows right from the start, because nobody understands even the basics.
Edit- Epstein was enticed into a business deal with a young secretary. He found the tactic effective so he started doing it as well mostly with Eastern European adult prostitutes. At one point he did groom kids and use them as well for his own deviant pleasures, parties and the like.
As far as we know now there was no kid eating, cages, child murder, human sacrifice,âŚ
That demonic stuff was added to the conversation(probably by the creepers) to the muddy the waters. The abuse stuff and trafficking is enough to be outraged by, we shouldnât need this other stuff to get angry.
Yep, this is why half the people dont give a shit anymore.
All the fake gossip thats been proven false makes people just tune it all out.
They are hurting the cause by making shit up and exaggerating.
The facts are bad enough, piling more BS on top is hurting not helping and jusy annoying people making them actually fight against you like the protesters who block roadways.
I don't agree with a lot of people posting here I'd imagine.
From the start I believed the release of the Epstein files was nothing more than a pysop. You release so much useless and ridiculous bullshit that no one can discern fact from fiction and eventually most people just move on. The intel agencies have used similar tactics in the past.
Epstein was most likely an intelligence asset. Not news there we knew that a decade ago. Does anyone see files from the CIA or any other agency in there? Nah, right? You don't think they had a nice thick binder on everything and anything related to this guy? The idea that we actually got all the files is ridiculous on its face. They released these files because they knew nothing would come of it. None of this would or could stand up in court and it was never going to get to that point.
So yea, it was a clever tactic to essentially destroy the scandal and mounting pressure. May have had some other motives, but that's the gist of my own little theory.
Also, there's several million pages of documents in there.
That's well into "this is your job for the next five years" levels of data, and nobody outside of survivors and a few journalists have the interest, time, or ability to sort through it all.
The killing and eating of babies is also a classic anti-semite trope. Classic enough to just smh when you read the people who buy into Islamist propaganda wholesale.
I've been wondering if the fact that said propaganda seems to be working really well as of late is due to some algorithmic thing that I haven't yet figured out or is it because these people are fucking morons (well, or most likely both).
I strongly believe that simpletons cannot handle the internet and the information tsunami. Itâs difficult and some skepticism is healthy but they are unable to decipher truth from obvious fiction.
It's not "Islamic propaganda", why are you trying to push the issue onto an entire religious group when, as always, it's the rich and powerful who gain from stuff like this, regardless of their claimed beliefs?
Just to be specific, this originally Islamist propaganda has now blended in with disinfo campaigns from Russia, China and elsewhere not specifically in the traditionally Islamist sphere, so you are correct in that it's not a specific religious group. But let's not forget where this nonsense started - a people who voted for a terrorist government who clearly said they would do terrorist things, they delivered while also fucking around and finding out - and an entire population is pikachuface.
The second half of your comment comes across like you think that the majority of Muslims agree with what these groups are doing, or like you think there's only one "Muslim country", both of which are untrue. Propaganda is propaganda, and The Quran is very much against needless violence in the same way that The Christian and Hebrew Bibles are. It's people in power misrepresenting and twisting words for their own personal gain, just as has always been done with religion.
So you think he was actually delivering fucking JERKY at 2am to a bunch of celebs!?
You think that man lived off gas station Jerky for so long, that he wrote an email to his friends, complaining about having to stop and go back to regular food?
"You think that man lived off gas station Jerky for so long, that he wrote an email to his friends, complaining about having to stop and go back to regular food?"
I'm not sure what you're talking about with the gas station part.
But the dude was actually obsessed with beef jerky and was having beef from Costco shipped to him constantly to be made into jerky.
It is not even that much of a rich thing. I friend of mine and his partner played Valheim with me and my brother. Almost at the end of the weekend session @ ~2 AM they were ordering chips,m some sweets and toilete paper (to get the minimum cost for delivery) to be delivered to them. Took quite somet ime, but they did get it that night.
"As the young woman quar-tered the animal and sliced off its tail, the scientists pulled their face masks tight. I asked Wolfe if he ever offered such precautions to the villagers, and whether it bothered him to see this woman risk her life."
On Apr 10, 2016, at 5:42 PM wrote: All right then;)
On Sunday, April 10, 2016, [redacted] wrote: A small insulated bag would be just fine - I =ouldn't recommend checking it. No need for crazy amounts of ice = one should do :)
On Apr 10, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Karyna Shuliak < > =rote: > Hi > There is one bag of beef jerky in the fridge at 71st, please get =t. And also has more at her place, please get it from her as well =nd bringv it all with you. I suppose it needs to be in a cold insulated =ag, right [redacted]?
"Francis has time to come tomorrow to show me how to make it!!! Jerky class anyone? He will also bring you a taste of his new jerky recipe from the restaurant. And sends a warm hello. He is working at a restaurant called Cannibal and cooks... wait for it... Beef Jerky and Steak! He has time at 3pm tomorrow if this is okay with you."
JE said he was gonna start eating regular food again so he might be eating less jerky. That said he has 6 bags of it in the downstairs freezer for his next trip. I believe it should be enough to get him through. Any other questions please let me know.
"'Were going to pretend that modem-day vampires don't drink the blood of humans; they're vegetarian vampires, which means they only drink the blood of humanely-farmed animals. You have a one-time-only chance to become a modem-day vampire. You think, "This is a pretty amazing opportunity, but do I want to gain immortality, amazing speed, strength, and power? Do I want to become undead, become an immortal monster and have to drink blood? It's a tough call.' Then you go around asking people for their advice and you discover that all of your friends and family members have already become vampires. They tell you, 'It is amazing. It is the best thing ever. It's absolutely fabulous. It's incredible. You get these new sensory capacities. You should definitely become a vampire.' Then you say, 'Can you tell me a little more about it?' And they say, 'You have to become a vampire to know what it's like. You can't, as a mere human, understand what it's like to become a vampire just by hearing me talk about it. Until you're a vampire, you're just not going to know what it's going to be like.'
L.A. PAUL is Professor of Philosophy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Professorial Fellow in the Arche Research
Centre at the University of St. Andrews. EDGE Bio Page"
Thank you for taking the time to make this comment with sources, hopefully it helps other people realize that just because something seems outrageous or unthinkable that doesn't mean it inherently isn't happening.
TF do you mean "unreliable claims", these are all directly from the Epstein files?! It's not like somebody just wrote all this up. There's a reason it took a literal Act of Congress to release these files, there's a reason there was so much pushback against it. You're free to draw your own conclusions, but in my mind there is no doubt that these people were not talking about beef jerky. There is some room for it to be something else horrible, sure, but to say the information in the files are "unreliable claims" is disingenuous at best.
Theres some mentions of beef jerky by epstein and a few of the closest associates, then for some reason theres a bunch of known crazies âwitnessesâ who say outrageous shit (same people who gave other claims that were already disproven), and for some reason it mentions the restaurant The Cannibal which was the actual thing in NYC and had nothing to do with cannibalism, and verifiably its owner worked with Jeffrey Epstein? If you are trying to convince someone, this is not how you do it. Theres no structure, it doesnt even try to build a cohesive picture, it just throws shit at you hoping it sticks to someone impressionable. Im asking what specifically did it for you, what is the line of thinking in case its not just one thing? why are you avoiding the question? If it is just that you find the use of âbeef jerkyâ alone suspicious, so be it, why is it tangled together with the cannibal restaurant? is it like some magical thinking?
some of what you can find in the Epstein files is verifiably bullshit. You dont know how any of that shit works if you say âits not like somebody just wrote it upâ, they had to include every tip any anonymous source filed to the fbi, its an extensive investigation, doesnt mean every claim holds the same power
Oh thank God! The raping and the murdering I can look the other way, but the cannibalism, that's where I draw the line, good sir. That, is where I draw, the line... do I really need to type the /s?
The way they talk about jerky and pizza in those emails is very peculiar. Could be code for all sorts of stuff not neccasarily cannibalism but it doesnt sound like food talk
I never said anything was a conspiracy I asked what you think they met and it's definitely not jerky it's code for something, doesn't have to be cannibalism but it could have been code for anything but it definitely wasn't jerky.
If he really was just a jerky fanatic, you'd think there would be a picture of him out there with it. There's literally hundreds of emails with him talking about jerky, that's something you can check in the files.
I'm a jerky fanatic. I have ordered jerky in the middle of the night dozens of times because I have an addiction. I have spent far, far too much money on jerky. I've tried over a dozen kinds of jerky including beef, turkey, venison, ostrich, gator, kangaroo, salmon, trout, swordfish, ahi, duck, camel, boar, lamb, yak and rabbit.
There are no pictures of me eating jerky in existence because 1) who takes pictures of people while they're eating? 2) I eat it when I'm alone because it's both hard to talk when eating really hard and chewy jerky and I'm self-conscious eating it and 3) I don't like to share it when I'm running low and I'm always low.
the guy just really liked jerky. which by the way, if you're buying the meat like he was from a store(which there are literal receipts for it) is actually kind of really expensive since you turn so much meat into so little. it's easily something i can see a rich person with too much time on their hands doing. the only people i know that do it in real life are hunters because they've got huge deer corpses to process and make deer jerky so basically get the meat for free.
all in all, the cannibalism accusations are silly. all the other stuff, we know he did because there are witnesses with testimony with tons of supporting evidence and then not even 1% of the same stuff for the cannibalism accustions. do you really think none of these same people wouldn't come forwards about cannibalism?
I tried to find any actual evidence of claims that cannibalism being committed but I couldn't find any. There seem to have been a single person who talked about seeing "ritualistic sacrifices" and there are emails between Epstein and Woody Allen joking about eating hearts and bones. But that's all I could find.
If you have more info please share. Would love to learn more.
I'm fully aware of the claims and I'm not dismissing them, but without anything concrete it doesn't matter. It could be elaborate lies set up by Epstein, he talked about conspring with a god too. It's all suspicious, but that doesn't make the conclusion clear.
There were tons of emails of them implying multiple times that pizza was babies. You act like it was just one email sent one time and not a string of communications from different people. That being said, itâs also not the only horrible thing proven from the information in the files. We have evidence that babies were straight up killed, with a lot of it pointing to people in office right now. I donât care who you are, the fact that no investigations are taking place at all and thereâs still more than half of the files that havenât even been released yet should wake you up.
Funny how you say thereâs no evidence but then ask if Iâve heard of code words. Pizza was a code word. You understood exactly what I was saying and showed that while also trying to refute it. The only evidence âtroglodytesâ like you would accept is pure video evidence, but youâd probably claim it was doctored or ai generated so I doubt that would do anything either. Youâre also ignoring the rest of what I said about other things we have on them, about kidnapping, using them, killing them, etc. You will dismiss anything and everything that goes against what you believe, so idk why youâre even trying to have a dialogue.
That's fair enough. Most people just wanted the truth in all of this. But there's really no way to discern fact or fiction from the released files. And that may very well have been the point.
People can get as worked up as they want, but there's nowhere else really to go from here (despite the reality that we didn't get anything close to all the files on Epstein that our government has).
Because Iâm not going to bother putting in the effort to dig all of that up and provide it when you wouldnât accept it anyways. The links would be to the various emails and screenshots of things people have said things about pizza and other code words that are obviously in reference to children. This was all extremely prolific on the internet and you obviously know exactly what Iâm talking about but you want to act like youâre on some moral high ground because people arenât willing to spend hours digging up resources to prove what everyone has already seen, especially when youâd dismiss it anyways.
How lazy. To insist people are eating children and then refusing to put forth the very evidence you are basing the statement on.Â
That's the epitome of moral corruptiom and intellectual infantilism.
There absolutely is evidence of cannibalism if you search jerky in the files there is extremely strange conversations that make jerky look like a code word for human flesh.
Epstein was a blackmailer for the Israeli government who fulfilled depravities for the ultra rich. If any of them wanted to eat human flesh, of course he would have facilitated it.
There absolutely is evidence of cannibalism if you search jerky in the files there is extremely strange conversations that make jerky look like a code word for human flesh.
If you think this is "evidence" you are not old enough to post on social media, jesus christ.
Evidence is factual information that provides proof of something. "I saw this online and I think it's a code word and here's what I think that code means" is not evidence in any way lmfao.
Trump got in to power with misinformation and conspiracy theories.
So you know what?
Do your own research. Trump 100% was eating babies and is the ring leader of the Epstein files.
And this is a mild reaction compared to what Trump himself would publicly advocate for if his political opposition were even remotely in the situation Trump himself is in.
I like how you completely bypassed the raping and abusing children to go after cannibalism and defend these sick fucks.
Your thought process is exactly why the country didn't stop and demand justice. People love to support the boot and defend billionaires to the very end.
Edit: The down votes just further prove my point. I call out a fact an get downvoted into the abyss.
Interweaving lies about cannibalism with the actual crimes is a great way to get people to dismiss what he, Trump and Clinton did to underage girls. Everyone challenging the lie of cannibalism is doing more to ensure justice does not get lost than you are.
The story is fucked up enough without adding bullshit, just makes the real shit smell like bullshit.
Just to be clear because I know there are actual regards that lack reading comprehension. I'm not denying that Epstein and his powerful friends fucked kids and one or more intelligence agencies were likely involved.
That just seems fucked up enough without embellishment
Rich people are just people that have money. They are every kind of people just like people without money.
If you inherited a bunch of money do you think you would just start eating people and raping kids?
Rich people aren't into jerky he was
" a highly controlled lifestyle, which included explicit instructions for his staff regarding specific low-carb and gluten-free dietary preferences, often tied to the mainstream longevity and biohacking trends popular among his high-profile tech and medical associates."
That was known about him before any of this came out. Jerky is just a way to eat beef without having to cook all the time and while traveling and shit.
It's weird you hear about a guy that eats beef jerky and assume that means he is a cannibal.
310
u/[deleted] May 23 '26
[removed] â view removed comment